n vitro cytotoxic activity of methanolic extract of N. sativafrom different germination phasesduringMTT assay

Prevalence of extracellular virulence factors in Vibriofrom Cochin estuary

Relative antibiotic resistance amongVibrioisolated from Cochin estuary, shrimp farm and seafood

Antibiotic resistance among Vibriofrom seafood

Antibiotic resistance amongVibriofrom shrimp farm

Antibiotic resistance amongVibriofrom Cochin estu

Antibiotic resistance amongVibrio

Antibiotic resistance amongVibrio

Environmental parameters

Validation of the predicted 3D structure

Secondary structural prediction

In silico prediction of Dof gene family of sorghum

Phylogenetic and motif analysi

Phylogenetic and motif analysis of sequenced Dof domains

Gel elution of PCR products

PCR amplification of Dofdomain

Isolation, purification and quantification of genomic DNA

PCR amplification of Dof domains/genes and studying the polymorphisms generated by different sets of primers for cereals and millets

Assessment of parasitic burden in hamsters vaccinated with rLdADHT+BCG and challenged with L. donovan

The recombinant Th1 stimulatory proteins (rLdADHT, and rLdTPR,) induced lymphoproliferative and NO responses in normal/infected/cured hamst

rLdADHT was cloned, overexpressed, purified and antibody raise

Results of molecular docking

The table 6.1 gives the mixing probabilities and the associated parametricvalues fork(number of components) = 2,3, and 4. It may be noted thatthe Log likelihood value is smaller fork= 4 (the results fork= 5 , 6 etc.are not better than that fork= 4 and hence are not given here). The fourcomponents Poisson Mixture model is given in table 6.2. It may be notedthat 58% of wards may have higher incidence/relative risk and the remainingwards have lesser/lower incidence for the Cancer disease. We computed theposterior probability for each component for each ward (see table 6.3). Eachward is assigned to a particular component so that the posterior probability islarger. These results are also given in table 6.3 Finally we present Choroplethmaps based on those results

We have analysed the Cancer data of patients in 155 wards of Chennai Cor-poration by the above described method. As preliminary analyses, we havecreated the Choropleth maps for Observed counts, Population of wards, ex-pected counts for patients and SMR's.The Choropleth map for the observed counts Figure 5.2 does not show anypattern. But the Choropleth map for the expected counts Figure: 5.4 indi-cate that the inner regions of the Chennai Corporations have lower expectedcounts and the regions along the border have larger counts of patients. As ameasure of spatial heterogeneity we have computed PSH= 0:7108:Hence ofthe total spatial random variation, nearly 71% is due to spatial heterogene-ity and the remaining 28:92% is due to Poisson variation. Thus the spatialvariation is present in the data.The Choropleth map for Empirical Bayes smoothed rates Figure 5.5 re-veals that only 13 sub regions have high risk values. The wards with numbers53, 64, 67, 70, 78, 93, 100, 103, 110, 117, 122, 147 and 151 have high riskvalues. Though this information could be used by the health managers toconcentrate their work on these regions, one can look for additional covariatesin these regions for further study

Total haemocyte count assay

Spodoptera litura

Insecticidal activity

Venomous saliva optimization

Salivary gland-Histology

Salivary gland-Morphology and Anatomy

Maxillary stylet

Mandibular stylet

Head

Growth maximum values

Rates of growth (OD678/day

Growth

Phenological traits and plant height

Analysis of variance and differences among wheat varieties released in different years in India

Tested individually

T cell frequencies(Post vaccination response)

Decreased CD3 ζ chain expression on CD8 T cells in HBsAgpositive newborns

T cell phenotypic distribution in HBsAgPositive, HBsAgNegative from HBsAg positive mothers and healthy newborns.

Clinical characteristics of the subjects

Mean Somatotypes:

Mean Somatotypes:

Mean Somatotypes:

Somatotype Categories:

Range of Component Ratings:

Somatocharts:

Mean Somatotypes:

SOMATOTYPE DISTRIBUTION OF URBAN SAMPLE