Obsidian is the IDE; the LLM is the programmer; the wiki is the codebase.
【启发】这个比喻极具启发性:把知识库管理类比为软件工程——Obsidian 是 IDE,LLM 是程序员,Wiki 是代码库。这个框架的深远意义是:知识工作可以借鉴软件工程的全套工具链——版本控制(git)、代码审查(lint)、持续集成(自动 ingest)、重构(wiki 清理)。知识管理的「工程化」不是比喻,而是字面意义上可操作的。
Obsidian is the IDE; the LLM is the programmer; the wiki is the codebase.
【启发】这个比喻极具启发性:把知识库管理类比为软件工程——Obsidian 是 IDE,LLM 是程序员,Wiki 是代码库。这个框架的深远意义是:知识工作可以借鉴软件工程的全套工具链——版本控制(git)、代码审查(lint)、持续集成(自动 ingest)、重构(wiki 清理)。知识管理的「工程化」不是比喻,而是字面意义上可操作的。
Getting hooked on computers is easy—almost anybody can make a program work, just as almost anybody can nail two pieces of wood together in a few tries. The trouble is that the market for two pieces of wood nailed together—inexpertly—is fairly small outside of the "proud grandfather" segment, and getting from there to a decent set of chairs or fitted cupboards takes talent, practice, and education.
This is a great analogy
Using an issue tracker without them is, in my opinion, a little like using an outlining program that only supports two levels of nesting, or like using Wiki software that doesn't have the concept of reverse links. Makes me sad!
For consumers, the equivalent of "build or buy" could be called "ads or nerds". "Ads" meaning ad-supported services, like consumer Gmail or Facebook. "Nerds" meaning hobbyist services based on free software and commodity hardware.
Unlike naming children, coding involves naming things on a daily basis. When you write code, naming things isn’t just hard, it’s a relentless demand for creativity. Fortunately, programmers are creative people.
Chromium is a very popular web browser, the fully open source counterpart to Google Chrome.
Stallman has also stated that considering the practical advantages of free software is like considering the practical advantages of not being handcuffed, in that it is not necessary for an individual to consider practical reasons in order to realize that being handcuffed is undesirable in itself.