- Nov 2021
-
Local file Local file
-
wanted to moveaway from both the established order of fictionand the established order of society which wasbased on the standard, as Woolf says, set byWhitaker’s Table of Precedency: “
True: links standard of form to standard of SOCIETY with whitaker's table of prescedancy
-
narrative not only discards therepresentative element in the narrative dis-course, it does away with most of the conventions– plot, character, setting - which are commonlyobserved by the novelist, and concentrates onthe workings of the mind at large, on the eyless,i.e., on “the flickerings of that innermost flamewhich flashes its messages through the brain”27
ABSOLUTELY KEY
-
nfold in random order that turns into afragmentary collage of unfinished vignettes. Andas it turns, it produces a series of multifariousintrospections on the nature of life and theweight of reality, the future of literature and thecommitments of the writer, the social order ofmale–governed and military-oriented hierarchicsociety etc.
From thinking of "nothing important", W dpivots into serious trains of thought
-
“dormant”emotions are aroused, her “latent perception”is evoked, and the imagination is stirred.
Stirring of dormant emotions...
-
he Mark on the Wall” (1918),one of Woolf’s early exercises with narrative and“visual language” that fully accords with thetenets of the Post-Impressionist paradigmmentioned above, W
AMOTW: dude argues that Woolf's experimentation with form in this story directly resembles/was inspired by visual Fry's aesthetics of "pure form" which sought to portray a hidden internal wolrd of imagination as opposed to concrete reality. (specifically, points to similarities between...)
-
o arouse emotions which are normallydormant
Key for both lit and vis new techniques
-
into the life of Monday or Tuesday”14.
Just an ordinary day like in AMOTW - "importance" (or in this case lack thereof) setting on plot / theme?
-
mind receives a myriadimpressions – trivial, fantas
This is literally structure itself
-
writermust abandon the tyranny of convention andpursue a form that can resemble the mentalreality,
novelists of future, also general structure
-
-
moodle.concordia.ca moodle.concordia.ca
-
ote that this i
Having trouble finding a so what that isn't evidenced by the graphs at the back. Should I explain the context of why Loyalist paramilitaries sought out these deaths? Overall don't "argue" as much and do a close reading - instead
Maybe just focus on UVF or UDA?
-
-
cain.ulster.ac.uk cain.ulster.ac.uk
-
uring the Stevens inquiry it became apparent that the UDA had access to a large number of security files on Republicans and suspected members of Republican paramilitary groups.
collusion
-
UDA, through the use of road blocks, which brought large sections of Northern Ireland to a stand-still
This throws a bit of a wrench into things: if they werent organized, how could they pull this off?
Maybe because this is before informents? Or showed less sectarian nature? Desire to remain?
-
s 40,000)
Damn. Strict contrast to UVF's tight central command (still compromised tho)
-
In April 1983 Joseph Bennett, who was a commander in the UVF, became an informer giving the RUC information which lead to the conviction of 14 leading members of the UVF. In the coming years the UVF was to suffer from the effects of further informers.
So informing still cripples org, just on a later date (and doesn't prevent killings?)
-
e Red Hand Commando (RHC) a loyalist paramilitary group closely associated with the UVF was formed in 1972.
Adjacent organization maybe?
-
aim of the present UVF is to ensure that Northern Ireland's constitutional position within the United Kingdom is secur
say this
-
hen UVF joined the British Army's 36th (Ulster) Division and fought - and died in large number
oh lol
-
It is estimated that the UVF and RHC were responsible for the deaths of over 500 people, mainly Catholic civilians.
boom
-
-
cain.ulster.ac.uk cain.ulster.ac.uk
-
22
Killed a higher percentage of its own men (say why? informers?
-
33
PAF inherintly just evil
-
75
Official low(ish), UFF almost half
-
351
Holy shit. vast majority civs
-
-
cain.ulster.ac.uk cain.ulster.ac.uk
-
Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) 62
Inflicted more damage and took fewer hits
-
-
cain.ulster.ac.uk cain.ulster.ac.uk
-
Protestant Action Force (PAF) 37
UVF, might be major source of collusion too
-
-
moodle.concordia.ca moodle.concordia.ca
-
ederick Douglas
Videos:
- (importance)symbolic leader and orrator, statesman
- born a slave (till 20)
- established a public persona - speaking at anti slavery societies. invited to nantucket island - hired as abolitionist orator
- narrative of life
NPR: rochestor speech'
- ladies anti slavery society - invited Doug
"What to the Slave..."
Speech of three acts:
Sets audience at ease. Declaration the "ringbolt" of american liberty - american passover as 4th of July
Then pivots to slave trade horros. First person narratives. Middle movement - horrible repitle coiled up at nation's heart
Last movement - nation still young and changeable could save yourselves.
great theme: Amerciasn SECULAR and RLIGIOUS hypocrosy in face of slavery. Warns there will be disruption/violence because of it
Statesmen and heroes -> founding fathers. Not evil. MEant what he said - principles of teh declaration "saving principles"
- Right of revolution.
Pronouns you: YOUR founders YOUR DECLARATION -> not enjoyed in common.
Gutsy move? Was. Very poigniant attack on "patriotic" americans/ POINTS TO DECLARATION PRINCIPLES - you've GOT THE DOCUMENT< PRACTICE VIOLATES IT ALL.
ALWAYS BELIVED right to vote was at core of liberty
-
The arm of the Lord is not shortened,” and the doom of slavery is certain. I, therefore, leave off where I began, with hope. While drawing encouragement from the Declaration of Independence, the great principles it contains, and the genius of American Institutions, my spirit is also cheered by the obvious tendencies of the age
Like ending to sentiments - assess stakes going forward
-
the Constitution is a GLORIOUS LIBERTY DOCUMENT. Read its preamble, consider its purposes. Is slavery among them? Is it at the gateway? or is it in the temple? It is neither. While I do not intend to argue this question on the present occasion, let me ask, if it be not somewhat singular that, if the Constitution were intended to be, by its framers and adopters, a slave-holding instrument, why neither slavery, slaveholdi
Evokes intent and power of constitution crafters
-
Then, I dare to affirm, notwithstanding all I have said before, your fathers stooped, basely stooped To palter with us in a double sense: And keep the word of promise to the ear, But break it to the heart.37 And instead of being the honest men I have before declared them to be, they were the veriest imposters that ever practiced on mankind. T
FOUNDERS AS IMPOSTERS
-
ndangers your Unio
yikes
-
ou declare, before the world, and are understood by the world to declare, that you “hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal; and are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; and that, among these are, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;” and yet, you hold securely, in a bondage which, according to your own Thomas Jefferson, “is worse than ages of that which your fathers rose in rebellion to oppose,” a seventh part of the inhabitants of your country.
dec reference
-
aro
Whole list of contradictions
-
republican religion,
How is there religion republican?
-
improving the condition of mankind,
uno reverse
-
hey teach that we ought to obey man’s law before the law of God.32
dec?
-
American church is guilty, when viewed in connection with what it is doing to uphold slavery; but it is superlatively guilty when viewed in connection with its ability to abolish slavery.
omission vs comission re responsibility
-
and tramples in the dust the great truth of the brotherhood of man.
From what document might this great truth be discerned?
-
given the sanction of religion and the Bible to the whole slave system.
So does this call into question religious authority at large?
-
The fact that the church of our country, (with fractional exceptions), does not esteem “the Fugitive Slave Law” as a declaration of war against religious liberty, implies that that church regards religion simply as a form of worship, an empty ceremony, and not a vital principle, requiring active benevolence, justice, love and good will towards man.
Religion and principle
-
lavery has been nationalized in its most horrible and revolting form. By that act, Mason and Dixon’s line has been obliterated;25 New York has become as Virginia; and the power to hold, hunt, and sell men, women, and children as slaves remains no longer a mere state institution, but is now an institution of the whole United States
Fugituv
-
i
Also list of grievances
-
hout wages, to k
KINDA like lists of grievances
-
uld you have me argue that man is entitled to liberty? that he is the rightful owner of his own body? You have already declared it
American people as INHERITORS OF DECLARATION BUT ALSO OF RESPONSIBILITIES FOR UPHOLDING IT
-
Must I undertake to prove that the slave is a man? That point is conceded already. Nobody doubts it. The slaveholders themselves acknowledge it in the enactment of laws for their government.
3/5 clause
-
n the name of the constitution and the Bible, which are disregarded and trampled upon, dare to call in question and to denounce, with all the emphasis I can command, everything that serves to perpetuate slavery
Once again, calling upon Bible AND constitution to "declare" slavery bad
-
do not hesitate to declare,
dec
-
ellow-citizens; ab
Contradiction: fellow citizens, and yet we vs you -.> citizen vs political rights citizen?
-
mouth
Promised land / Jewish connotations
-
The rich inheritance of justice, liberty, prosperity and independence, bequeathed by your fathers, is shared by you, not by
inheritance of liberty
-
The evil that men do, lives after them, The good is oft-interred with their bones.18
Do ideals surpass the men who created them here?
-
Washington could not die till he had broken the chains of his slaves. Yet his monument is built up by the price of human blood, and the traders in the bodies and souls of men shout — “We have Washington to our father
hmm
-
The causes which led to the separation of the colonies from the British crown have never lacked for a tongue.
Ideals of revolution have never left american ears since then
-
interests.
sacrifice for country
-
eclaration of Independence is the ring-bolt to the chain of your nation’s destiny; so, indeed, I regard it. The principles contained in that instrument are saving principles
DECLARATION ring bolt. contains foundational PRINCIPLES
-
th of July is the first great fact in your nation’s history — the very ring-bolt in the chain of your yet undeveloped destiny.
first bolt in chain
-
They did so in the form of a resolution; and as we seldom hit upon resolutions, drawn up in our day whose transparency is at all equal to this, it may refresh your minds and help my story if I read it. “
deification of dec
-
hese people were called Tories8 in the days of your fathers; and the appellation, probably, conveyed the same idea that is meant by a more modern, though a somewhat less euphonious9 term, which we often find in our papers, applied to some of our old politician
Specific political connections?
-
they became restive under this treatment.
Thinks america failed in this initial defiant act becaus ethey "grew restive" with being oppressors like Britain
-
This, however, did not answer the purpose. They saw themselves treated with sovereign indifference, coldness and scorn. Yet they persevered. They were not the men to look back
So act of SIGING the dec itself inspired furtehr generations. Not just ideals -> saw it as a brave ACT that could be replicated by standing up to tyranny wherever it lay
-
t is fashionable to do so; but there was a time when to pronounce against England, and in favor of the cause of the colonies, tried men’s souls.
Easy to say fuck England now. In day required courae. Douglas AGREES THEY WERE BAD THOUGH
-
fathers
paternal relationship between brits and americans
-
It is the birthday of your National Independence, and of your political freedom.
your = white?
-
we”, “us”, “they” and “you”?
Different use of pronouns?
-
wo years after the Compromise of 1850, which included a strengthening of the Fugitive Slave Act—which bolstered the ability of Southern planters to retrieve escaped slaves in the North—Douglass praised American political principles while excoriating the country for ways in which slavery made a mockery of these very same ideals.
Principles vs practice: speech delivered at ind day celebration so immediate connections to declaration
-
-
cain.ulster.ac.uk cain.ulster.ac.uk
-
The term 'punishment' attacks covers shootings or beatings carried out by paramilitary groups on individuals they accuse of being involved in activities that are classified as 'anti-social behaviour' such as drug dealing, theft, and joyriding.
also song
-
Kneecapping' One form of 'punishment' favoured by paramilitary groups. Initially it involved shooting the victim in one or both kneecaps. However later on people who were punished in this way could be shot in the knees, or ankles, or thighs, or elbows, or wrists, or any combination of locations. Often guns were not used and instead victims limbs were broken by sticks or iron bars.
song
-
-
drive.google.com drive.google.com
-
remind us that there is no limit to the horizon, and that nothing — no ‘method’, no experiment, even of the wildest —is forbidden, but only falsity and pretence.
MODERN: ILLEGAL FREEDOM
-
More accurately indeed we might speak of the inconclusiveness of the Russian mind. It is the sense that there is no answer, that if honestly examined life presents question after question which must be left to sound on and on after the story is over in hopeless interrogation
Imagination/inconclusivity
-
, or ‘that is tragic’, nor are we certain, since short stories, we have been taught, should be brief and conclusive, whether this, which is vague and inconclusive, should be called a short story at all.
Looks at Russian example of MODERNIST short story and likes that its
-
e has to have the courage to say that what interests him is no longer ‘this’ but ‘that’: out of ‘that’ alone must he construct his work. For the moderns ‘that’, the point of interest, lies very likely in the dark places of psychology. At once, therefore, the accent falls a little differently; the emphasis is upon something hitherto ignored; at once a different outline of form becomes necessary, difficult for us to grasp, incomprehensible to our predecessors.
"Moderns" shifting their interests (courageously, against the grain) away from conventional subjects and into darker psyc realms of human experience
-
ain.
I think in sum saying its impossible to capture everything?
-
In contrast with those whom we have called materialists, Mr Joyce is spiritual; he is con- cerned at all costs to reveal the flickerings of that innermost flame which flashes its messages through the brain, and in order to pre- serve it he disregards with complete courage whatever seems to him adventitious, whether it be probability, or coherence, or any other of these signposts which for generations have served to support the imagination of a reader when called upon to imagine what he can neither touch nor see.
Discarding old conventions built up over generations.
What about Shakespeare? Do research on this?
-
hat it is of the utmost sincerity and that the result, difficult or unpleasant as we may judge it, is undeniably important.
Might be messy, difficult, but this kind of writing important
-
n what is commonly thought big than in what is commonly thought small.
Simple pleasures. ARCH -> wife wants to do good works and thats it
-
trace the pattern, however disconnected
OF snail shell maybe?
-
even if to do so they must discard most of the conventions which are commonly observed by the novelist.
Thing PEACHES employs this quote.
MODERN EVID: need to discard realist conventions (plot, etc) to achieve SoC
-
some such fashion as this that we seek to define the quality which distinguishes the work of several young writers, among whom Mr James Joyce®
Explicitly links this mission to modernist writers like Joyce.
MODERN EVID: Like w/ materialism, doesn't explicitly state "modernism" anywhere (probably hadn't been coined yet) but goes w/ this association to make our assertions concrete
-
it not the task of the novelist to convey this varying, this un- known and uncircumscribed spirit, whatever aberration or com- plexity it may display, with as little mixture of the alien and
Interesting...
MODERN EVIDENCE: so Woolf isn't just claiming that Noveslists should pursue internal descriptions, she's saying that they should PREVENT EXTERNAL from leaking in
-
semi-transparent
MODERNISM EVIDENCE: At very least describes life as vague/ transparent as opposed to concrete
-
ind on an ordinary day. The mind receives a myriad impressions — trivial, fantastic, evanescent, or engraved with the sharpness of steel. From all sides they come, an incessant shower of innumerable atoms; and as they fall, as they shape themselves into the life of Monday or Tuesday,’ the accent falls differently from of old; the moment of importance came not here but there; so that, if a writer were a free man and not a slave, if he could write what he chose, not what he must, if he could base his work upon his own feeling and not upon convention, there would be no plot, no comedy, no tragedy, no love interest or catastrophe in the accepted style, and perhaps not a single button sewn on as the Bond Street tailors would have it
Hmm. Can I just argue that this passage sums up what the MOTW is? Is that too much of a reach, like, "non traditional story structures abound in this story like thses" Would need to pack up each sub point (show of impression) w/ textual evidence, but is possible.
Worth it though? Good to come back to at least?
-
Look within and life, it seems, is very far from being ‘like this’.
EVIDENCE MODERNISM: KEY PHILOSOPHY. While "life" might externally represent realist descriptions, internal life does NOT
-
as the pages fill themselves in the customary way. Is life like this? Must novels be like this?
Every time you close your eyes... (Lies, Lies!)
-
to provide a plot, to provide comedy, tragedy, love interest, and an air of prob- ability embalming the whole so impeccable
List of some conventions realists employ
-
writer seems constrained,
Constraint
-
labour thrown away
Like the old archaeologist. Does work, for waste EVID REAL
-
ceases to resemble the vision in our minds.
EVIDENCE REAL/MOD -> realism conventions Don't resemble internal thought structures (realness of mind)
-
If we fasten, then, one label on all these books, on which is one word materialists, we mean by it that they write of unimportant things;
Ok: two points here.
PEACHES is right -> materialists is word she uses
EVIDENCE REALISM -> They write "unimportant" things very well
MAKING THE TRANSITORY APPEAR THE TRUE AND ENDURING (when obviously its not)
-
taking upon his shoulders the work that ought to have been discharged by Government officials, and in the plethora of his ideas and facts scarcely having leisure to realise, or forgetting to think important, the crudity and coarseness of his human beings.
EVIDENCE REALISM: explicitly says this realism author should stick to facts/writing pamphlets. Does this super well, neglects to include CRUDITY/COURSENESS of human beings -> implies internal reality is unstable.
Overall:
- Woolf posits that reality is shifting/flawed/not just external. Human souls are flawed. In order to portray what's "accurate" need to focus on INTERNAL truths (thought processes, etc) as opposed to EXTERNAL descriptions of characters and events and such
-
is characters live abundantly, even unexpectedly, but it remains to ask how do they live, and what do they live for?
Not getting at truth of matter. The HOW is answered (archaeology) but not the WHY - reflections/internal
-
e can make a book so well constructed and solid in its craftsmanship that it is difficult for the most exacting of critics to see through what chink or crevice decay can creep in. There is not so much as a draught b
Conventions again overly intricate, useless, and "praised" so hard to overthrow
-
writers are materialists.
What Peach was talking about: not realists but basically means this. Proper word/term alludes her
-
r Wells, Mr Bennett, and Mr Galsworthy have excited so many hopes and disappointed them so persistently that our gratitude largely takes the form of thanking them for having shown us what they might have done but have not done; what we certainly could not do, but as certainly, perhaps, do not wish to do.
These authors claim to reflect reality, fail, but in doing so reveal we shouldn't even try
-
accomplishment that we can scarcely refrain from whisper- ing that the fight was not so fierce for them as for us.
More entrenched institution evidence? (how could it possibly be overturned)
-
We do not come to write better; all that we can be said to do is to keep moving, now a little in this direction, now in that, but with a circular tendency should the whole course of the track be viewed from a sufficiently lofty pinna- cle.
Lit not innovated - has moved in pendulem like swing unlike science
-
compare their opportunities with ours! Their masterpieces certainly have a strange air of simplicity.
Direct mention of simplicity of conventions -> opportunities for FUTURE NOVELISTS abound
-
modern practice of the art is somehow an improvement upon the old.
Pretty explicit
-