In simple harmonic motion, the acceleration of the system, and therefore the net force, is proportional to the displacement and acts in the opposite direction of the displacement.
These words imply, as we have already seen, that the total energy \(E\) is proportional to the square of the displacement, \(q\), using a generic coordinate \(q\) and to the square of the coordinate velocity, \(\dot{q}\). Or, as the math department might say, the function \(E\) is "quadratic" in \(q\) and \(\dot{q}\).







The author's \(\vec{w}_y\) vector is attached at its tail to the mass point, whereas in my sketch, it is slid over and attaches at the tip of \(\vec{w}\). But both are acceptable and useful. As I have mentioned several times, how you diagram forces etc. can be different from the author's and from my way of diagramming, and still be fine.
"


Who does this? Measure distance to a fishing spot from your tent? Really!
(Ernest Rutherford)
(Enrico Fermi)
(Albert Einstein)



(Test diagram)







