No es de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires solamente?

¿A qué mecanismo se refiere en Argentina? ¿La Procuración Penitenciaria de la Nación?

It's redirecting to Mobility Data's GTFS validator.

Where do they show that levels were equal between groups upon treatment completion?

Suman 100%?

Sin grupo control!

Just noting that in the config script the default username seems to be root. Maybe use root instead of wikiuser in this example?

Is this the year he graduated? Or what?

Of these examples, index.php and load.php are not covered in the "Entry points" section of the documentation, but rather on the "Files" section: https://doc.wikimedia.org/mediawiki-core/master/php/files.html

The difference between social networks and social media outlined here does not match the difference explained above, highlighted by the interviewees.

64 bits doesn't seem to be compatible with Rpi 2. I had to install Rpi OS and then install YunoHost on top of it.

An Oracle instance may be used for that. It offers unlimited inbound and 10 TB / month outbound traffic for free.

2 not supported? Not recommended?

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706598.3713564

The Meta AI app includes a Discover feed, a place to share and explore how others are using AI.

https://about.fb.com/news/2025/04/introducing-meta-ai-app-new-way-access-ai-assistant/

Tipo "El rincón del vago"?

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/QuickSurveys

But this water is not polluted, is it? Couldn't it be used for something else as it leaves the plant? Closed circuits?

But how often do these trainings actually occur?

How does this compare to servers used for blockchain technologies?

So Musk is using a paper published by Microsoft Research suggesting that GPT-4 may show sparks of AGI to complain that OpenAI licensed this to Microsoft.

I'm not 100% sure but I think the way how Google and Wikipedia would use it is different.

The proposed use here in Wikipedia directly summarizes the content of the article where you are reading the summary.

Whereas in the Google case it may be using knowledge embedded in the model itself, plus summarizing some choice among the search results.

The contributor says it's OK that Wikipedia has "become a byword for sober boringness".

They also take the (in my opinion) correct decision of calling it "machine-generated" as a way to hide what they think should be called "AI-generated" (which is an ambiguous term that doesn't help with discussing the topic).

See (now resolved) Phabricator task: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T340693

How is this supposed to give editors time back?

Is that what he used both for LLM and embedding models?

Open annotation on a public layer, such as with Hypothesis here, may be one intermediary alternative.

As I understand it, models are just an approximation. Unless they are infinitely large.

They don't seem to include this increase in public knowledge due to cheaper AI-approximations on their model.

See https://github.com/tabulapdf/tabula/pull/1174

May need to add --add-opens java.base/java.util.zip=ALL-UNNAMED --add-exports java.desktop/sun.java2d=ALL-UNNAMED

I don't see this explicitly reflected on the specific priority's page.

What "communities" do they mean?

Is this spreadsheet publicly available somewhere?

How?

How is this supposed to happen?

Who is "us"?

Who?

Skill decay, environmental impact and lack of compensation to or consent from training data creators are some of the reasons not to use generative AI.

What about now, with search-the-web capabilities added to these chatbots, such as ChatGPT and DeepSeek?

So this Accept activity is not sent in the response of the Follow activity, but rather on a separate delivery to the follower?

I'm not getting this. Instead, it's complaining that No actor key pairs dispatcher registered.

It knows its domain! https://fedify.dev/manual/federation#how-the-federation-object-recognizes-the-domain-name

This won't work without registering the inbox listener above first.

This is for the instance's shared inbox.

As is, this causes an error to be logged by the logger: ERR fedify·webfinger·server No actor handle mapper is set; use the WebFinger username 'me' as the actor's internal identifier. I understand this is related to Fedify's default behavior of assuming the actor's identifier to be the same as the WebFinger username. See https://fedify.dev/manual/actor#actor-identifier-and-webfinger-username

Apparently, compatible images are Ubuntu Minimal: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Minimal

At the time of writing this, they have suspended free plans temporarily.

In Mastodon, offending accounts are reported to the server where the reporting account resides. It is this server that decides what to do with the offending account's content. Reports can be forwarded to the offending account's server, but this is optional.

See https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2018/07/cage-the-mastodon/ for why this is a design decision.

Servers may remove an actor from another actor's followers list if the follower actor remains unreachable for a long period of time.

Does this mean receiving and Accept from the followed user in a client-to-server interaction?

Otherwise, if the server receiving the Accept refers to the follower's server, shouldn't the Following collection be updated instead?

What about quote retweets? Aren't they used to express disagreement too?

What does this mean? Is that the user posting the activity? But didn't them post it to their outbox first?

What about them forcing you to put the switching costs on users? That is, what about them forcing you to remove the fire exits?

How is that?

But I think this movement is not as strong in Argentina as it is in Europe.

May work in Argentina too!

I guess XMPP could be used for this?

Qué hay de otros protocolos como el protocolo AT?

This seems to be one of these such tools: https://github.com/YuriCosta/WhatsApp-GD-Extractor-Multithread

The articles in this category are: - English Wikipedia articles only. Do they support writing in other languages too? - Translated articles (or that's what the category says).

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ley_de_Brandolini

¿Es realmente eso lo que fascina a los magos? ¿Que el público intente averiguar, sin éxito, cómo hacen lo que hacen? ¿O más bien disfrutan ver el asombro de la gente?

Parece demasiado cientificista. ¿Siempre hubo "ciencia"? ¿Cómo conocíamos el mundo antes, si no?

El sesgo cientificista de nuestro conocimiento. ¿Hay otras formas de conocer?

Can't tell what they mean by "anomalous structure" in the paper they cite.

bias

hence the importance of the Shared Citations project: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiCite/Shared_Citations

how do they determine what claims references are connected to?

I'm not sure about this. What about what Google's NotebookLM is doing? Or experiences like STORM to create Wikipedia-like articles?

Usan el valor compound que devuelve la función polarity_scores de la clase SentimentIntensityAnalyzer de la librería nltk: https://www.nltk.org/api/nltk.sentiment.vader.html#nltk.sentiment.vader.SentimentIntensityAnalyzer.polarity_scores

Pero si subjetividad y objetividad se derivan de polaridad, y ésta se refiere exclusivamente a el "sentiment strength", nada se puede decir sobre la descriptividad de la información incluida o la neutralidad de la fuente.

cuál sería esta evaluación?

es una sola medida! las otras dos derivan trivialmente de la primera

según el código fuente, es 1 - abs(polaridad)

según el código fuente, es 1 - objetividad

no eran 6 por medio?

son cinco

Se muestran 6 artículos (dos de Página 12 y uno por cada uno de los otros 4 medios). Cuáles son los otros artículos?

código fuente en https://github.com/gusunavarro/koluel/blob/master/pnl.py

Hasta ahora se habló de Streamlit como de una librería. Pero ahora parece hablar de Streamlit como un servicio.

De cualquier modo, por qué es una ventaja? A cambio de qué ofrece Streamlit este servicio?

El uso de esta herramienta no parece relevante para el tema el artículo. Tratándose de un artículo en el que se mide polaridad, subjetividad y objetividad como aspectos del "sentimiento", habría que destacar las librerías que se usaron para tal fin, en todo caso (que no queda claro si fue TextBlob o NLTK).

no dice que usaron textblob para análisis de sentimientos?

esto se puede resolver indicando la versión específica utilizada

biblioteca para Python

No es claro. De qué está hablando? Habla de Streamlit y de polaridad de sentimientos, pero no parece haber establecido un vínculo entre ambas.

Qué son las "vistas de aplicaciones"?

So which locales are supported?

In Linux Mint 22, I needed to add arch=amd64 between the square brackets as well. Otherwise I got error repository 'https://josm.openstreetmap.de/apt noble InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'i386'.

I think he may be Richard Wendler instead.

No encuentro fuentes que confirmen esto. Por el contrario, solo encuentro que habría sido portugués.

they mean the one proposed by Ariel Gutman? https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia/Natural_language_generation_system_architecture_proposal

Se refiere a comunidades de "Proyectos Wikimedia" como se define en el glosario (Wikipedia en español, Wikidata, etc).

Es como si la Fundación Wikimedia se limitara a ofrece servicios de gestión a la comunidad Wikimedia, representada por el Consejo Global.

No entiendo si se refiere a la distribución que establezca el Consejo Global, o los recursos que establezca el Consejo Global.

aconsejada por el Affiliations Committee (AffCom)?

"la implementación y aplicación" o "implementando y haciendo cumplir"

Equidad en el conocimiento según Wikipedia en inglés (Knowledge equity):

Knowledge equity is a social science concept referring to social change concerning expanding what is valued as knowledge and how communities may have been excluded from this discourse

No habría que definirlo en la carta del movimiento?

I don't want to be naive, but it may be good to remember here that local communities will still have the choice whether to introduce the Abstract Wikipedia content in their local language editions, or not. That is, nobody will force anyone to use Abstract Wikipedia content in some way or another.

But I understand this thought may be naive.

So probably it will be the case that these marginalized editors will be able to share their view of the world in topics where these views are not challenged by other more powerful views. For example, topics relevant to this marginalized communities, and unknown to the other communities.

When does the graph need to be rebuilt from Wikidata dumps? When servers crash and content in RAM memory is lost?

Are these and other linked-data format requests created live?

different uses of Wikidata properties

Do they mean the same property used in different contexts, such as in statement o reference auxiliary nodes?

What is "real-time linked data"?

Turtle and N-Triples are data formats for storing RDF data.

What do the inflection points mean? * ~March 2013 * ~July 2017: Freebase migration? Freebase was closed in 2016... Or lexicographical data from early 2018? Points in x-axis represent January or July? * ~July 2019 * ~April 2020

Some points are actually multiple points at the same place that show when you click on them. For example, many movies are narratively located in Argentina, but many of them show as a point in the middle of the country.

As a result, it may seem that not so many movies are narratively located in one place, but actually it is because the place has not been specified down to the locality or province.

Ideally, these "many-points" points may be bigger the more points they represent.

Nowhere in the cited paper does it say that Twitter uses Wikidata in any way. Instead it says that the researchers of the cited paper used Wikidata for their research purposes, about Twitter.

According to Wikipedia's article about Google's Knowledge Graph, by 2020 it had 500 billion facts (statements), that is roughly 350 times the number of statements (although without annotations/qualifiers, I assume), and 5 billion items, that is roughly 50 times the number of items.

Of course the problems with the size of Wikidata is not only technical (e.g., SPARQL queries times) but also social: how can we maintain this amount of data?

I wonder how Google's Knowledge Graph role may be changing in this era of generative AI's.

But this seems to fail to acknowledge that in the The Signpost's article linked to above it says that once it was rejected because of copyright infringement, but another it was because of insufficient sources.

Blubell is a plain-text language, similar to Markdown, which simplifies the authoring of Akoma Ntoso documents.

Did they control for the fact that users of the plugin are probably commited users of Wikipedia already? That is, how representative of the general population of ChatGPT users is the sample used in this survey?

By default this runs the lawlibrary site.

To run another site (e.g., open_by_laws, change the os.environ.setdefault("DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE", "lawlibrary.settings") line in manage.py.

I only found in the dokku deployment documentation how to configure the search index:

python manage.py search_index --create

In OCRMyPDF v15.4.4, this doesn't seem the case. When using the --pdf-renderer hocr option explicitly: * I get a .hocr file in the temporary files folder; * I avoid segmentation errors when reading the file with Mozilla's PDF.js; * When text is selected using a PDF reader, I can see the OCRed text (instead of blank characters).

What about an hOCR file?

Probably an invisible font for invisible text overlay. Is it possible to use a non-glyphless font, yet invisible (i.e., it would only show when highlighting the text)?

Therefore, is it up to the PDF reader to determine what is a "word", a "line", a blank space, etc?

Jesse, R., & Griffiths, R. R. (2014). Psilocybin research at Johns Hopkins: A 2014 report. Seeking the sacred with psychoactive substances: Chemical paths to spirituality and to god, 2, 29-43.

Pero esto ha empezado a cambiar con la introducción de plataformas como Netflix, Spotify, Steam, etc

Quiénes y por qué obras??

Let's Connect clinics require registration via Eventbrite. See https://www.eventbrite.com/e/lets-connectleadership-development-working-group-x-wikimania-2023-tickets-672597927507

How does Facebook estimate this leaning? What does Facebook say about it? Is it based on a US perspective?

Al día de hoy: Acampar: $4500 noche por vehiculo Pasar el día: 2000 por vehículo no hay alquiler kayak no hya bar

pero se puede alquilar kayak o ir al bar de dos predios alrededor (sin pagar el día en ellos)

Gratuidad de las donaciones. Gratuidad implica ausencia de contraprestación.

El texto es de la resolución general 4444 de AFIP. Menciona "medios electrónicos autorizados".

Acá una lista de medios de pago electrónicos según el BCRA: https://www.bcra.gob.ar/mediospago/politica_pagos.asp

https://laesienjuego.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Informe-Acoso-Escolar-en-Argentina-CAPIC%C3%9CA-2014.pdf

In addition, JavaScript implementations jsonpath and jsonpath-plus do not implement script evaluation safely.

Because it uses https, it should be safe to pass the token as URL query string.

Headers can bee used too: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29876906/is-it-possible-to-pass-facebook-graph-api-access-token-through-request-header

It may also be used {app-id}|{app-secret} as stated in the app access token documentation.

So it's not the only way?

that would be if decision was "yes" or "no", I guess.

Does the game provider know who is playing?

parece ser bastante libre

cuando hay varias opciones "yes" (como en los juegos de juanman), cuál se elige con el shortcut?

at the root? { tiles: [...], low: 1 }??

what does this involve? what are the steps

query parameter?

How could this error occur? Shouldn't the XPathExpression, whose evaluate method we are running, have been created via the XPathEvaluator's createExpression method? Shouldn't the error have been raised there instead?

Is this related to the bug described here?

Note that this won't work if the debugger is launched via npm: // .vscode/launch.json { "request": "launch", "runtimeExecutable": "npm" }

This is because the --preserve-synlinks argument would be passed to npm instead of to node.

In such cases, the env attribute may be used, setting NODE_PRESERVE_SYMLINKS to 1, but note that this won't work if node is not the first command in the npm script being run (e.g., do something && node).

Won't this be ignored because we are using webpack?

Since webpack-dev-server v4, HMR is enabled by default. It automatically applies webpack.HotModuleReplacementPlugin which is required to enable HMR.

But won't this set the development mode even when I'm building for production?

lo de que el usuario no tiene control es cuestionable, ya que puede participar de discusiones en torno a qué proyectos financiar, presentar proyectos, votar miembros del concejo, etc

Creo que es relevante destacar aca que se pueden ver todas las ediciones que un usuario hizo en el sitio.

No es esto el software libre en vez del codigo abierto?

Some types missing from the documentation: * files (see https://wikidata-game.toolforge.org/distributed/#game=10) * url * html * map

Is there an additional options property defining game types?

"options":[{"name":"Entry type","key":"type","values":{"dog":"Dog","bridge":"Bridge","tree":"Tree","hieroglyph":"Hieroglyph","musical instrument":"Musical instrument","mountain":"Mountain"}}]

there seems to be a "type" parameter specifying the game version requested

See this workaround using HeaderEditor extension.

But because may stories may be made from a single article, and users can change the text they "imported" from Wikipedia, it would be cumbersome for editors changing some text in the article to make sure whether they have to change it in a story.

Couldn't the text become linked to the Wikipedia article somehow?

Wikipedia integration

now known as "server"

aka. "editor"

Where would I import them into? I guess I may need to import them into my slice files. But these export reducers which are imported into the store file, creating a dependency loop. Right?

Edit: See below; they say it's a safe circular import.

How is this difference calculated? If the value is an array, or an object, given that state is updated immutably, won't it always be different?

I don't understand this, because we could still call react-redux's useDispatch to get the store's dispatcher, couldn't we?

This has probably been solved in React-Redux v8

See here

Wouldn't that be of the components that have subscribed to the Redux store?

Both functions of React Redux.

I guess this could be achieved using context as well as explained above.

In the example above, when <ParentComponent /> is rendered, wouldn't <ChildComponent /> be rendered as well, independently of whether contextValue has changed or not, given that it is a child of the <ParentComponent />?

Edit: Yes. See below.

Does it have to be "user-provided"? Can't it be fetched data?

What does "require" mean here? Does this mean that if a hook state update passes in / returns the same reference as before it won't queue a re-render?

Edit: see below.

In function components, one can define functions outside the function component. However, I guess they wouldn't have access to the component's props and state.

Is this also true if <OtherComponent /> is memoized as well?

Why doesn't React automatically skip rendering in these cases, given that it does know the previous and new props and state of a component?

Edit: Well, this is what PureComponent does, below.

Does this mean that all of state updates occurring on this phase are also batched into a single render?

Does this mean they are immediately run after each state update?

I was wondering whether this should be done in the module defining and exporting the component, or in the code consuming it.

Given that React.memo could be thought of as a replacement of PureComponent for function components, I think it would be appropriate to have the module export the wrapped version of the component.

Aren't React components meant to be deterministic? Should this always be the case?

This makes sense here because if the context is set by an ancestor component based on its state, any child component consuming the context will update, not because of the context update, but because of the state update of the ancestor (which caused the context to be updated).

See here for a more detailed explanation.

Do they? According to this, don't they re-render whenever their parent component is re-rendered (for instance, when their state is changed)?

What would be a good strategy to suggest people to remove from one's followers to reduce compactness = redundancy?

UNICET's definition of compactness seems to be available here: http://www.analytictech.com/ucinet/help/2cqc8q.htm

On the other hand, there is a definition of Gephi's "density" here: the number of links divided by the maximum number of links possible.

Do these two measures match?

How is diversity measured?

Where is this table returned from?

Can a regular list be converted into an additional check list?

What would happen with the DOIs that were cited before? I assume these DOIs would refer to a set of observations as they existed at a certain time.

More than 2500 as of July 2022: https://www.gbif.org/dataset/50c9509d-22c7-4a22-a47d-8c48425ef4a7/activity

See https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/better-use-of-location-in-computer-vision-suggestions/915/47?u=loarie

Remember "visually similar taxa" may be at any level.

What are "related species"?

Who gets notified of these changes? How does the community make sure that no vandalism occurs?

This default license is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons. See this thread here: https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/a-case-for-changing-the-default-license-to-not-include-a-nc-clause/18690/119

Why don't they use OpenStreet Maps?

See this post by one of the creators: https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/use-openstreetmap-maps/2588/33

And captive observation misidentification shouldn't be such a big concern.

So this is not something they do yet