A source! http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/derive

French Poststructuralist movement of the 50's and 60's: http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Post-structuralism

By segmentation does she mean categorization? In which case, didn't she warn against categorization earlier in the article?

A linking of things, linking together (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/concatenate). Interestingly enough, people also describe string theory as strong concatenation

It's a product of "viral intensities" rather than simply a place for them to be produced

So can a "site" be almost like an experience of sorts?

I think this is a fascinating and very comprehensive topic sentence. It connects to the essay's main aim by emphasizing the fluctuation of a location-- thus alluding to the fact that there is a network in a location, which is a living, breathing thing.

To me, this links back to what Edbauer (Rice) was saying about temporality and the connection of that to the sender to receiver model. Networks cannot be rooted in one fragment of time, she claims, because then they become inflexible-- they may be perceived differently at different times, may reform over time, or many grow over time. Likewise, with the sender-receiver model, that is not a one and done thing. Perception of a message is flexible. So this begs the question, how do we recognize temporality in our rhetoric?

By identifying set elements, new elements are excluded, making a network incomplete in its lack of fluctuation. Moreover, by labeling and categorizing these elements, we are inherently excluding what we have yet to understand or be exposed to

a network that is not linear or singular-- the audience and speaker are interconnected

discovery vs. creation

This is a consecutively linear communication style, as if the singular piece of "text" is be sent by the singular "sender" to the singular "receiver." This alludes that there is one unilateral message that comes from one place-- there is one isolated topoi that is not public.

Something that is lived in cannot be static, and cannot be perceived as such

Can we discuss in class?

Schindler and Fleming talk about this in their own words

Something to discuss in class-- how homelessness does not transpire from individual crises, but often from situational or systemic crises.

I never thought about this idea of "pride" in beating the system, but it's very logical. They have outsmarted those that have thought to constrict them, offering an alternative that they know will not be used, but has better results for them personally and for others in similar situations. It's like the anxious thrill of rebelling against some rule or social norm.

This is a little confusing-- does this refer to the democratization of space?

Something to talk about in class

Public shame or disgrace http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ignominy

I find this interesting, because where I live, those simply living on the streets-- under a bridge, in an alcove-- are often arrested or fined without warning.

This sort of trust is amazing, yet saddening to recognize that it was only the tunnel that could grant him solitude

Something to discuss in class

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Corbusier I know it's wiki, but there are interesting ideas regarding architectural idealism

This connects to what Schindler said about ignoring or discounting the importance of built environments and the dangers of discrimination in architecture. By not responding to the damage, the citizen is partially to blame. As a community, there is a necessity to be open minded when it comes to the sharing of space

So are these spectators? Are they active or inactive observers? http://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2013/10/17/in-praise-of-the-flaneur/

This is really cool, I'd love to talk about this in class

This seems like an overarching theme for many of our readings and class discussions in general. Fleming argues that architecture/place+structure and rhetoric are deeply linked. Neressova is essentially making the same claim, but on a broader scale. Space is where we build our environment, our constructed areas, and through rhetoric we, as human beings, are connecting. Thus, I would say that there are similarities here.

Transition that refers to subject

IC, DC

they say one thing, to add to that, I say another

Adds connective phraseology from the previous subject

fanboys

It all sounds highly animalistic; there are pens and traps and gates to keep people "safe."

It's chilling to think about the lack of safety that goes along with this. The lack of concern when creating these environments is disturbing, whether the decisions are conscious or not.

I think this is a really interesting, yet possibly misguided point. I would agree that more scholarly research has been conducted on social and legal inequality and that less has been done on architectural injustice. However, I would also argue that there has been a movement against architectural injustice led primarily by victims themselves. Housing equality is a major focus for those living in neglected areas who are politically inclined. There were demonstrations against tenement living styles in New York in the early 1900's. MLK led a housing equality movement in Chicago in the late sixties. As there are fewer scholars reigning from these areas, the author has a point, but she also seems to be dismissing the fight communities stuck in poverty have been putting up. Scholarly research may be limited on this topic, but the discussion has been going on for generations.