1,493 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2016
    1. The catalyst for change is not necessarily a desire to share the ethos of dialogue and collaboration that has shaped some new forms of peer review and publication in the digital spac

      True, but we can make our ethos the one that matters?

    2. one goal of the journal is to offer scholars strategies for making their pedagogical, editorial, and design work legible as scholarship to tenure committees, job search committees, and the discipline as a whole

      A strong argument for students as well.

    1. In this sense, the rhetorician weighs the positive and negative possibilities of different types of textual appropriation against desired objectives:

      Quite burden, no?

    1. Set project work with explicit networking goals and a phil project as part of it. Mandate that students find off campus resources which they curate and present to class (either online, on a collab blog, or in class), reward students with facetime on their blog – good posts and comments get lecturer feedback,.

      Great ideas here.

    1. About Michael Collins

      You put about as much thought into this article as you do washing your underwear.

    2. Rep. Phil Roe, R-Johnson City, isn't a fan of D.C. statehood either.

      Because I don't want two Democratic Senators.

    3. the district back to Maryland, Alexander said. The district was created from land ceded by Virginia and Ma

      Because I don't want two more Democratic Senators.

    4. "The District of Columbia was set up to belong to all Americans, and it has a special place, not only in the life of our country, but I think to all of the individuals who come here from all of the states."

      Because I don't want two Democratic Senators.

    1. One of them, Chuck Johnson, said, “I don’t want this to be done in my name in this town anymore.”

      Amen.

    2. That year and the next, he paid off at least $1,200 in fines, although he apparently still owed about $500.

      Outrageous.

    3. In the seven states that collect the most comprehensive data on traffic stops, analysts have found often-striking disparities in how African-American drivers are treated. In two of the states, Connecticut and Rhode Island, changes in traffic enforcement followed.

      Not surprising, really.

    1. . Sensual objects exist for real objects, namely, me, or some other perceiver. So I’ve got the caricature of the table and the caricature of the chair, those caricatures have no relation to each other. They have relation only for me, because my experience unifies both of them. So the real is always the bridge for the two sensuals; the sensual is always the bridge for the two reals. And that’s what we try to analyse in Object-Oriented Philosophy

      Cole's problem is that this is Kant.

    2. real objects,

      But why would I be "Real" here?

    3. sensual object

      But this is the human construct, no?

    4. that leads to the fourth and final point I was going to make which is that since real objects withdraw from each other, the only option is that sensual objects are the glue between them.

      Ok.

    5. I simply borrowed this term from com-puter science as a joke. I don’t know a lot about object-oriented programming.

      Aha. I wondered.

    1. Could these medieval traditions issue another call, then—a call for the reassessment, if not adjustment, of the disciplinary language of speculative realism and the cognate philosophies, their modus procendi et loquendi? Will that call be heard?

      I guess here what he's really after is to include the medieval traditions into OOO?

    2. Well, you would write something about "withdrawn objects," as Harman does, just as Kant would write of things-in-themselves—with the key difference being that philosophers who absorb the Kantian lesson know the limits of their discourse, whereas those who flout that lesson take off into flights of pure reason, speculating about the interior life of objects and getting inside the heads of things. (The other key difference for Harman, of course, is Heidegger, whom Harman needs to revise because he does not help with this one Kantian fundamental: Heidegger admits that human attention and awareness—that is, what constitutes a subject—are special aspects of human consciousness needing philosophical analysis.) The Kantian problem remains in place: if there is something that cannot be thought, then maybe it cannot be thought. You cannot write your way any closer to the object, circle the wagons of indirection and allusion around it as you may.

      The heart of his critique. But Harman seems to think that "If you think about Kant, there are probably two basic things going on in Kant. One of them, of course, is that there are things in themselves that can be thought but not known, and so philosophy becomes a meditation on the conditions of human access to the world instead of about the world itself. That’s one feature of Kant. The other feature, however, which doesn’t get quite as much attention, is the fact that it’s always a matter of human and world, which later gets called correlationism by Meillassoux, which means that in Kant’s framework you can’t talk about the interaction of two inanimate entities. All you can talk about is how humans come to perceive that collision between two entities in terms of the categories of the Understanding and space and time? You’re never going to talk about the world in itself without humans being there. And so philosophy becomes a kind of epistemology" (here

      "Now, since there are two aspects to Kant, two major aspects to Kant, there are two major ways you can reverse him. Now the first way is what the German Idealists do, which is to say Kant was great except that he had this naïve, old-fashioned, dogmatic thing about the things-in-themselves, so we can get rid of that. And they also held that the distinction between thought and reality is actually internal to thought. This gave us German Idealism and now it gives us Žižek and Badiou. And it gives us Meillassoux. "

      He further adds: " I would prefer to reverse the other aspect of Kant. I think finitude is a decisive step forward. I don’t think we can get out of that, but I think instead of reversing that, we can reverse the human world priority in Kant. So, GRAHAM HARMAN in other words, instead of finitude being this tragic human predicament—where poor humans are trapped in our categories and we’re trapped in space and time and we can never know the in-itself the way God would—I hold this to be true of all relations whatsoever. Whatever the two terms are, whether there’s a human there or not. Any relation involves finitude. Any relation including brute, inanimate causal relation involves a kind of finitude. Things are withdrawing from each other even at the inanimate level."

    3. consumer goods,

      Another key point for Cole: OOO reinscribes the commodity fetish.

    4. Talk Talk
    5. Fichte knew that this initial relationship with objects is a mystical one and requires the mystical discourse of the summons. He understood that our moment of spontaneous receptivity to the call of things is the moment before self-consciousness. It is the moment before self-thematizing, the moment when the self has yet to define itself over and against objects, the moment—in other words—before Kant.

      What a great sentence.

    6. we are working our way toward asking how the fundamental Heideggerian principles of speculative realism (Harman 2005, 76) remain informed by medieval mysticism and indeed what a mystical discourse can do for objects deemed mysterious.3

      This is the rub, getting us back to the Medieval.

    7. so too does it possess the concept of its own freedom

      Which gets us to Hegel's Lord / Bondsman ontology, no?

    8. "forms of possible experience.

      Heuristics?

    9. This principle is, I will show, a convenient fiction in this new work, enabling the philosopher to hear the call of things and to speak to and for them, despite the new rule that we cannot think of objects as being-for-us and must reject older philosophies smacking of "presence" and traditional ontology or ontotheology

      So this is the leap. But what about work like this?

      "Answers to this question are beginning to emerge from an area of work I see as connected to rhetorical ecologies, the study of object-oriented ontologies (OOO), led by Graham Harman, Levi Bryant, and Ian Bogost. Bogost’s self-described “elevator pitch” for this area of inquiry reads as the following:

      Ontology is the philosophical study of existence. Object-oriented ontology (“OOO” for short) puts things at the center of this study. Its proponents contend that nothing has special status, but that everything exists equally–plumbers, cotton, bonobos, DVD players, and sandstone, for example. In contemporary thought, things are usually taken either as the aggregation of ever smaller bits (scientific naturalism) or as constructions of human behavior and society (social relativism). OOO steers a path between the two, drawing attention to things at all scales (from atoms to alpacas, bits to blinis), and pondering their nature and relations with one another as much with ourselves. (bogost.com)

      There’s much more to this area, of course, no surprise given its relationship to Heidegger’s work, but this statement makes the case for a focus on things, just as theories of rhetoric as ecological inform my research methods. While OOO rejects the disproportionate historical focus of study on all things human, often referred to as correlationism, focusing on objects does not mean dismissing human-based studies so much as looking with equal rigor at all the innumerable phenomena that populate the world. This is a question of balance, as becomes clear with Bogost’s call in the last phrase of his blurb to consider objects in their “relations with one another as much with ourselves” (emphasis mine). As those concerned with activism—i.e., action mostly on behalf of people—our anthropocentrism will never recede so very much, but work like that of rhetorical ecologies and OOO opens space for us to consider the existence, movement, and effects of objects in new ways. Hence, my claim that adapted flags might do a kind of activist work on their own. From this angle, any flag objects than trigger thoughts or actions on behalf of D.C.’s disadvantaged would be doing the work of activism."

    1. Ontology is the philosophical study of existence. Object-oriented ontology (“OOO” for short) puts things at the center of this study. Its proponents contend that nothing has special status, but that everything exists equally–plumbers, cotton, bonobos, DVD players, and sandstone, for example. In contemporary thought, things are usually taken either as the aggregation of ever smaller bits (scientific naturalism) or as constructions of human behavior and society (social relativism). OOO steers a path between the two, drawing attention to things at all scales (from atoms to alpacas, bits to blinis), and pondering their nature and relations with one another as much with ourselves. (bogost.com)

      For a critique of ANT and OOO, see Andrew Cole's, "Those Obscure Objects of Desire" and "The Call of Things: A Critique of Object Oriented Ontologies."

  2. dcadapters.org dcadapters.org
    1. as a complex network through which we all pass everyday

      How so?

    1. 14.3On a fly(rf)B to right field only, a runner at second base may advance with this calculation:Baserunner’s Running rating +/- right fielder’s arm, +2 for the throw to third base from right field. Roll the 20-sided die. However, the only OUT chance is the split chance of 20. If the roll is higher than the highest safe chance, but lower than 20, the runner holds at second base.Example: A 1-14 runner and a -1 arm. Safe: 1-15; Hold: 16-19; Out: 20.14.31This baserunning option is available whether the fly(rf)B occurs off a player’s card or the Advanced Fielding Chart.14.32NOTE: This rule does not apply to fly(rf)B? readings from cards or to F2 readings from the Super Advanced Fielding Chart. The Super Advanced Fielding Chart contains its own rule for poten-tial advances from second base to third base on F2 results to right-field.

      Didn't know this one either.

    2. Convert the “gb()+” to a SINGLE** ONLY when the in-field is all the way in.

      Good to know.

    3. Play

      Welcome!

  3. www-tandfonline-com.proxyau.wrlc.org www-tandfonline-com.proxyau.wrlc.org
    1. Painful public texts are important to engage not in order to feelpained, but in order to affirm our life in the sensorium. By considering these texts asactive agents within both the epistemic and sensorial realms, we are simultaneouslyundoing the pathological effects ofprivacy.

      And this strikes me as countering the notion of an "expected" or "forced" sensation.

    2. If communication, or speech, is a matter of being gatheredtogether, then we should also consider the ways we are gathered together bypathological texts. In experiencing the commonality ofbeing woundedsimply byexposure within the sensorium, along with its contamination risk, we are gathered.Again, we aim not simply to“feel bad together.”Reflecting on how texts alterstructures of feeling is one way to re-attune our capacity to beinterestedin rhetoric’spublic realm.

      This gets to the core of her point.

    1. "This is monumentally stupid political theater," Bradley Moss, a lawyer who specializes in security clearances, told The Hill in an email.

      Awesome line.

    1. So I typically note that these are extensively researched theories, practices, and methods designed to help students learn not for the test or the grade but for the best possible retention and application of complex ideas that they will use in this class, in other classes, and in their lives beyond school. 

      Important point to remeber.

    1. Everyone is busy, very busy.  So we’ve set an ideal limit of 50-60 pages of outside reading per week, plus everyone reads the class blog written by one or, at most, two classmates each week and writes a response.

      Useful idea here.

    2. Learning to plan a syllabus for the real lives of students is respectful and encourages success, not failure and honest attention, not fakery, plagiarism and other workarounds.

      I must continually remind myself of this.

    1. The whole value system changes:  they are not doing your assignment for your grade.  They are learning as a survival skill, for personal growth, because it is meaningful to them.

      Sounds heavenly, theoretically. It's all in the execution, I suppose.

    1. “When you say black lives matter, that’s inherently racist,” Mr. Giuliani

      And this shows that Giuliani is abjectly ignorant.

    1. Recently the Polish foreign minister, Radek Sikorski, came over to the UK in a bid to stop the idiom becoming reality. In his speech at Blenheim Palace, he warned Britons against the easy temptations of exiting the EU.

      Vaclav Havel always said that the Central / Eastern Europeans had a lot of experience to share with the West, if the latter would only listen.

    1. “I don’t want to sound too positive, because I wouldn’t want her as prime minister,” he added, “but I would rather have her than the rest of those that are standing, because at least she is competent.”

      Now that's an glowing review.

    1. here is a great need, in my view, to problematize expertise, to find ways to rearticulate it within the circulation of knowledge.

      Yes!

    2. More pre- cisely, I want students to see that the shift in register and genre between a jour- nal article and a news report amounts to a shift in modality-the relative credibility and authoritativeness invested in written statements-that marks journal articles as "original" contributions and news reports as secondary and derivative

      Interesting.

    3. agenda, for students to un- derstand how that act of translation nec- It is no easy task to imagine how writing, media messages, or signifying practices of any sort can be turned into socially useful knowledge. essarily participates in and shapes the circulation of biomedical discourse in ways that go beyond simple information transfer and the attendant problem of accuracy/inaccuracy that so often frames such assignments. To do this, we need to reconstruct the systems of distribution and exchange through which messages about breast cancer circulate; to identify how the means of produc- tion (laboratories, equipment, scientific expertise) are distributed, material- ized, and reproduced; and to consider how moments of consumption are articulated within this circuit.

      His agenda.

    4. The contradiction be- tween exchange value and use value weighs heavily on the circulation of professional and academic writing of all types.

      Ok.

    5. My point is simply that we cannot understand what is entailed when people encounter written texts without taking into account how the labor power em- bodied in the commodity form articulates a mode of production and its pre- vailing social relations

      Indeed.

    6. and the question to begin with is not so much where the commodity goes as what it carries in its internal workings as it cir- culate

      And, of course, what form it takes.

    7. He wanted to chart a strategy for the working class to overthrow capitalism and reorganize production to meet social needs

      Well, later on, yes. Probably not the Marx of the 18th Brumaire.

    8. In contrast, for neo-Marxists such as Richard Johnson and Stuart Hall, although they certainly offer a fuller and more complex sense of circulation, there is a nonetheless a peculiar reluc- tance to talk about cultural products and media messages as commodities.

      The neo-Marxist critique.

    9. To my mind, Marx's notion of the commodity, with its divided inner work- ings, is the key figure missing from many present-day cultural studies' accounts

      Good stuff here.

    10. The term "category" is crucial here, for what Marx means by the commodity is not simply a thing (whether a product, message, good, or service) but the ma- terialization of an underlying and contradictory social process.

      Yes: the mystical, the fetish.

    11. Second, and perhaps more important, Marx wanted to explain the various moments in the circulation of commodities- the cycle of production, distribution, exchange, and consumption-not as a se- ries of separate events taking place in a predetermined order over time but dialectically, as mediations in mutual and coterminous relations that consti- tute the capitalist mode of production as a total system

      Yes, this is what Marx learned from Hegel.

    12. My point is that the epistemological and discursive status of a television show such as The Honeymooners or Buffy the Vampire Slayer-how, in other words, it can be known in its various transformations or "passages of form"-depends on how it circulates and, in effect, how it is exchanged and capitalized.

      Context, of course, matters.

    13. circulation (and the underlying political economy). That is, the encoding and decoding of a television show depend in important respects on whether it was broadcast on prime time in the 1950s, appears on Nick at Nite as a syndicated re-run, turns up as a clip in a documentary on the "Golden Age of Television,"

      Yes.

    14. What Hall correctly calls its "specific modality and conditions of existence" ("Encoding" 129) cannot be understood apart from it

      Yes. Exactly.

  4. designtechwrite.files.wordpress.com designtechwrite.files.wordpress.com
    1. (Bartholomae andPetrosky iii) of the academy; if certain disciplines feel the need to use thosetexts, they’re free to teach students their intricacies themselves.A box-logicalgenre like this displaces such texts from the writing class, substituting a basicawareness of how to use language and information, a cool project, and a senseof poetry.

      the post-process revolution.

    2. sustained inquiry, of the search as project—for me themost crucial part of the academic enterprise.

      Sustained inquiry.

    3. the important things emphasizedhere are voice,inquiry, atmosphere, selection, insight, and interesting materi-als.

      the skills.

    4. ow students to practice the basic skills of con-temporary composition: search and selection, arrangement/juxtaposition/lay-out, and self-expression. They learn a little of the basic logic of academic, cita-tional prose, as well: how one text is used to read or make sense of another text,with the writer’s own work a triangulation among data-sites. Students getpractice in using electronic technology (to both search and arrange), and theyalso get practice in writing as a way of being, of developing a stance and voicein the textual world.

      The use-value sales pitch.

    5. my challenge, I feel, is to have these youngpeople burnish not anthologized writers’ essays but their own form of power-ful pensée, while, certainly, at the same time learning some kind of basic prosestyling to help them avoid verbal pitfalls in formal settings.

      The challenge, indeed.

    6. I do, though, want them to see thelogic of the box as compositional grammar, what it implies about interestingresearch, selection, arrangement, and expression.

      That's the payoff.

    7. I’m suggesting, then, a pedagogy of the curio cabinet, anaesthetic of the objet trouvé. One that rejects auratic craft as weird and obses-sive, in favor of celebrating the basic image, seeing perception as a performa-tive gesture

      With possible assignments.

    8. Nottext as representation, but as trace or remainder, gesturing towards situationsthat once existed and were strongly felt, re-activatable with their concomitantquota of wonder.Pulsion as a term we now need for evaluating composition.

      Pulsion.

    9. There’s something increasingly untenable about the integrated coherenceof college essayist prose, in which the easy falseness of a unified resolution getsprized over the richer, more difficult, de facto text the world presents itself as

      This is the issue, and, again, Rice makes this same point in Crisis.

    10. I want students—designers, now,not essayists—free for such associational drifts; entering things naively, with-out countless rehearsals; trying to capture a mood or vision

      Jenny Rice's argument to in Crisis.

    11. Thus, no draft is ever finished, espe-cially in the arbitrary scope of an academic semester. For Cornell, “no ‘work’could ever be really finished, for much of its meaning continued to mill in hisimagination” (Ashton 2).

      Kanye's Pablo

    12. Here’s

      Test

    13. anony-

      Test

    1. Her solution is pedagogical: a shift toward inquiry as social action. Rather than encouraging students merely to write about what interests them or to take a definitive position in a paper or speech (requiring them to decide whether something is good or bad), Rice proposes that educators encourage their students to investigate the complexities of a given topic without a commitment to reaching a conclusion.

      This.

  5. Jun 2016
    1. We’re affluent, well-educated, gainfully employed and successfully retired.

      Notice you didn't say racist or xenophobic or transphobic or . . .

    1. And I think, even with those very, very material traces of history, one has to remember that the archive is a scene of invention, not a place of referential plenitude.

      Awesomely put.

    1. At this point, we might now return to Trimbur's question-What called this writing into being?-with an eye toward the affective, experiential primacy of a body-in-context.

      Here we get into the emergent body and that body as social being. The form--on a slant--using the only medium available . . .

    2. rather "[ w ]riting is always already writing for some purpose that can only be understood in its community context" (89)

      This is an old debate, though, right? Affective / Intentional Fallacy and all that Wimsatt/Beardsley stuff on up to Scalia/Fish debate on Originalism / Intentionalism? Obvious Constitutional interpretative consequences here.

    3. More specifically, I argue that rhetoricity itself operates through an active mutuality between signification and affect.

      New concept.

    4. In the following article, I want to make a case for why we should talk about affect when we talk about writing, reading, and literacy
    5. writing scenes are overwhelmingly populated by bodies: shocked, angry, delighted, and feeling-full bodies. Although many models of composition focus upon the signifying dimensions of writing, they often fail to account for writing's experiential aspects.

      Affect theory emerging in Rhetcomp

    6. Even the most wayward street writers must "figure out what relationship to establish with readers, how to establish this relation-ship, what voice to use, and what genre" (20).

      All writers must establish a rhetorical context. But do they really have a choice? And somehow this kind of statement seems very unconsciously racist by today's terms.

    1. In Monday's interview with Bash, he expressed absolute loyalty to Trump despite being dismissed from the campaign manager job.

      Exactly.

    2. His perspective might be uniquely valuable given that he was Trump's right hand man up until this week.

      Brilliant Trump move. He now has a surrogate on TV pumping his agenda full time.

    1. Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown.

      But that won't stop us from breathlessly speculating!

    1. The movie seems made to be launched into a virtual media space, to become itself a subject and element of discourse, but without reflecting on its own position there or on the status of the archive or the investigations that make it possible.

      Fascinating.

    2. For all the contentiousness at the heart of “O. J.: Made in America,” it reflects a time when a bastion of norms held fast—restraining the forces of both change and hatred alike.

      "a bastion of norms held fast"

    3. It has been a slogan since the late sixties that “the personal is political,” but it has taken until the age of social media for that ideal to approach reality, because social media has effaced the distinction. Web sites of quasi-private communications are actually very public; private lives are copiously self-documented and publicized;

      Public/Private.

    4. The information effect
    5. The kind of due diligence that, in the mid-nineteen-nineties, would have taxed a team of private eyes is now readily available at the touch of an “enter” key. The fact that a virtual ocean of information exists doesn’t mean that it’s known, doesn’t mean that a prosecution team would now do better at warding off its effect on the jury, and doesn’t mean that a defense team would make different use of it.

      Archival Research

    6. Archival Research

    7. Archival research.

    1. "Do you think that the elections are democratic in the United States?" Putin asked Zakaria, adding: "Twice in American history, a president was elected who did not get the majority of votes."

      At this point, Putin is trolling the RT-loving crowd. He certainly knows better than this.

    1. to point to because it “exists” only in a state of perpetual alteration: “Digital text is, above all, malleable … there is little sense in attempting to replicate the permanence of print [itself an illusion, according to the digital vision] in a medium whose chief value is change.” (Fitzpatrick

      Life of Pablo, Kanye West.

    1. BrunoLatour (2005)writes inReassembling the Social,

      chrome-extension://bjfhmglciegochdpefhhlphglcehbmek/content/web/viewer.html?file=http%3A%2F%2Fdss-edit.com%2Fplu%2FLatour_Reassembling.pdf

  6. www-tandfonline-com.proxyau.wrlc.org www-tandfonline-com.proxyau.wrlc.org
    1. The Arts & Crafts narrative continue

      interesting contrast between today's "Arts & Crafts" "artisinal" scene, and the 90s scene of generics, anti-corporate one.

    1. Critical pedagogy is thus invested in both the practice of self-criticism about the values that inform teaching and a critical self-consciousness regarding what it means to equip students with analytical skills to be self-reflective about the knowledge and values they confront in classrooms.

      Yes. The key seems to be to not infuse it with our own personal ideologies.

    2. Freire rejected those modes of pedagogy that supported economic models and modes of agency in which freedom is reduced to consumerism and economic activity is freed from any criterion except profitability and the reproduction of a rapidly expanding mass of wasted humans.

      By exposing the ideology involved?

    3. Consequently, there is little interest in both public and higher education, and most importantly in many schools of education, for understanding pedagogy as a deeply civic, political and moral practice - that is, pedagogy as a practice for freedom.

      This, frankly, doesn't seem any less ideological than the "market-driven logic," however.

    1. They are well aware of who will be doing the work and who will be doing the grading. If we want to establish a real community within our classroom, we need to do it honestly. As Elbow points out, an "honest exercise of authority, even if hated, would not bamboozle" (91). It is time to recover the I in our discourse.

      Yes. Important to remember this.

    1. . Beginning there, we must acknowledge that there is control, management, power, and manipulation at play in the classroom; and the best way to not let these dynamics unsettle learning is to be transparent about how they function (and to brazenly show the chinks in their armor).

      Yes. Important to remember this.

    1. n our contemporary situation, the excess of information creates an excess of noise and the increased demand for schemata or screen

      This strikes me as incredibly useful.

    2. "complex adaptive system."

      "the combination of multiple strange loops"

    3. but rather to undermine the very notion that one truth [...] exists" (27). This logic of the "and" of an always expanding dissoi logoi situates the subj ect in a network of multiple forces and attempts to address the complexity of our current cultural situation

      Living in multiplicity . . .

    4. the "weaker" argument that can easily turn to become the stronger. Situations are more complex than dialectics ac counts for.

      But this is precisely what Hegel's dialectic creates.

    5. he term also means to create meaning through language

      Heuristics

    6. But schemata actually move such mental grids from a synchronic position

      Framing his Quotation.

    7. This basic process has implications for rhetorical heuristics: (1) students need to develop their own schemata to fit their particular topics/situations, and (2) if we give them schemata first, their goal should be to revise those schemata as a part of the invention process rather than follow them prescriptively

      Repurposing Taylor's Complexity Theory to Comp.

    8. Simply applying rhetorical systems developed in the context of ancient Greece to our contempo rary period seems to fall into the desire for simplicity that Taylor hopes to counter

      Yes. This is well-explained.

    9. , expressivist
    10. his has certainly been the tendency in rhetoric and composition, whose primary debate has been between two opposing methods for simplifying the complexity of writ ing.

      On-going debate

  7. May 2016
    1. So not only does current-traditionalism eviscerate rhetoric in theory, but it also eviscerates rhetoric (and perhaps literature, too) in practice: current-traditionalism reduces rhetoric to style and form, style and form are devalued as basic, and the basics should be taught before college.

      This misses Fish's point.

    2. Fish’s belletristic current-traditionalism thus reinforces popular beliefs that need no reinforcing: the belief that academic work is a pastime that “only a small number of people in the world care” about, and that the humani-ties are as relevant to the real world as a degree in fencing.

      Just because the humanities are this way, doesn't mean he argues that writing should be this way, though.

    3. Here we see how poststructural textual fixation, the ille ne pas hors texte, opens the door for current-traditionalism: language, Fish asserts, is not “the vehicle of a subject matter it serves” but “is its own subject matter” (135–36).

      Logical thinking.

    4. o excise from the classroom all politicizing as Fish defines it—encompassing everything that is not academicized, and thus everything from polemi-cal indoctrination to civic participation—is to excise rhetoric itself.

      Not if it's a priori

    5. Once students have learned to construct a proper sentence, how exactly do they proceed to “write anything?

      Because they already know.

    6. Take “Jane baked cookies” or some other sentence of the same structure and build it up and out into a sentence of at least 100 words without losing control of the sentence’s basic structure. That is, you should be able to describe the relationship between the words and phrases you add and the sentence’s core structural logic, a logic your additions and elaborations must honor and preserve. (“Writing”)

      Getting beyond situations.

    7. They will certainly not be learning anything about how language works” (41)

      Post-Process.

    8. current-traditionalism.
    9. oric of public

      test

    Annotators

    1. “The thing about Trump is, he has been turning out historic numbers, even in my state here,” Mr. Lott said.

      Once fellow Republicans, says Lott, remember he's as racist as they are, they'll come around.

    1. On sentencing practices, data reported in the Daily Press show that Iverson's sentence was not "severe."

      Man, it's just incredible the amount of racism this paper projects. It's astounding, really.

    1. KEN ARMSTRONG

      I do wonder where he is today, and what he thinks about his reporting at the time. It's incredible how racist it is.

    1. KEN ARMSTRONG

      I wonder where Ken Armstrong is today. I wonder if he's ashamed by the reporting he's done here?

    1. The curfew means Iverson will have to miss next week's Amateur Athletic Union 17-and-under tournament in Winston-Salem, N.C

      The racism's just incredible, in a time when no one thought they were racist anymore.

    2. Two women and a man were injured in the fracas, during which black people "started hitting whatever white people got in their way," Killilea said.

      Holy cow, the prosecutor's taking institutional racism to such an incredible level.

    1. However,
    2. ndiana Gov. Mike Pence endorsed Ted Cruz on Friday, which may not be enough to help Cruz win Indiana, where he currently trails Donald Trump in polls, let alone the Republican nomination.
  8. Apr 2016
    1. , a Bernie Sanders fan,

      Even writers call themselves "fans" of politicians? DeLillo somewhere is smacking his hand on his forehead.

    1. The quandary—for Sanders and for the Party—is that the corruption of the political system is his issue. Last week, he was asked on the “Today” show about Trump’s “Crooked Hillary” line, and he called it “an ugly statement.” But, when asked if he, in a roundabout way, hadn’t also called Clinton crooked, he smiled and said, “In that case, the entire United States government is crooked.”

      And that's the contradiction.

    1. Germany depends on exports for its wealth and on the United States for its security. Yet many Germans do not see the trade agreement as a good thing.

      Classic.

    1. Writing

      Click "Public" above to change it to "Theory Round Table." You'll see a few annotations below, but they are a mistake. Toggle to THEORY ROUND TABLE.

    1. This kind of corporate pablum about Shakespeare tends to reflect the popular notion, sometimes unspoken but implied, that Shakespeare was, fundamentally, a conservative.

      False premise. I've studied Shakespeare my entire life and no one serious thinks Shakespeare as an idealogue of any stripe.

    1. Students have reacted to claims from university professors that they struggle to read books from cover to cover by admitting it is true -

      I don't see how this differs than 20 years ago, frankly.

    1. Logos principle

      )

    2. This principle is, I will show, a convenient fiction in this new work, enabling the philosopher to hear the call of things and to speak to and for them, despite the new rule that we cannot think of objects as being-for-us and must reject older philosophies smacking of “presence” and traditional ontology or ontotheology.

      The heart of the critique.

    3. according to the new line of thinking, objects should be recognized for their indifference to us, for the sorts of things they do behind our backs, and for the ways in which they “are” behind appear-ances
    1. To be an effective writer today, one must be an iconophilic who always plays on multiple registers at once.
    2. we must learn to think and write not only with words but also with images, sounds, designs.

      Yes. How?

    3. decentered subj ectivity
    4. If the university is to have a future in the twenty-first century, writers rather than scholars must lead the way

      Wow.

    5. We can no longer write merely with words but now must learn how to think and write with images and sound. Design?visual as well as graphic?becomes integral to writing.

      Yes! Yes! Why?

    6. riting, by contrast, is transgressive

      Yes!

    7. The process of peer review ensures the inviola bility of these codes and, in this way, discourages innovative work. What does not conform to the code is deemed unacceptable.

      Jeff Rice: "Assessment love the good guy."

    8. would like to encourage them to be as creative and inventive as possible. But the reality is that the academy is incredibly conserva tive .

      Yes. What's the balance here?

    9. If you are not pushing the envelope, why write?
    10. Works that I have labeled not-writing are regu larly reviewed positively in scholarly journals
    1. Sanders Is Right About Busting Up the Big Banks By:  Robert Reich

      "Oh, and yes, the episode also showed that making the breakup of big banks the be-all and end-all of reform misses the point."

    1. prompted us to rethink

      Very smart, I think, to get out in front of this in a responsible manner that respects hypothes.is principles.

    2. “without consent”

      Agreed the point can be made with a better term, but it seems to me the principle should remain.

  9. Mar 2016
    1. He said the District, Maryland and Virginia should create a dedicated funding source, such as a regionwide sales tax, to provide an additional $1 billion a year to Metro for capital investment such as maintenance. He also said the federal government needed to provide $300 million a year in additional money for operations.

      yes.

    1. "purity"

      But Bernie's purity comes from having been pretty much irrelevant.

    2. She behaves like a person who often doesn't know what the truth is, but instead merely reaches for what is the best answer in that moment, not realizing the difference.

      Pretty sentence, but I don't see her quite so cynically.

    1. provide a simple, accessible way for creators to disable Genius annotations on their sites

      I don't see anyway around denying people in public space a response, no matter how inane or even repulsive. Obviously, if a response moves into a threat, then that violates established law, right? It seems to me that "feeling safe" or "unsafe" in this context is incredibly situated. Ultimately, you get control of your blog by password protecting it and inviting a select group to read it. If you give a public speech, the public has a right to react how it sees fit and within the bounds of the law, it can do so without censor.

    2. ck a user from annotating m

      Can a comedian stop the heckler?

    3. It is not opt-in for the creator, and if I want to engage with the annotations, I have to sign in using a Genius account

      Of course not. We're playing in a public space. If you want to restrict your audience, password protect. I mean if you go outside on the street and read your essay, don't you think you'll elicit all kinds of responses, many of which will be unpleasant? I don't see the difference, to be frank. You don't get to control your audience anymore than any other performer. That's the nature of public production. Indeed, that's the point of public production.

    1. According to the New America Foundation, 103 Americans have been killed by terrorism since 9/11. Over a comparable period of time, 2000 through 2010, approximately 108 Americans died by having TVs fall on them, according to the US Consumer Product Safety Commission. And at 72 fatalities, domestic mass shootings in 2016 alone have killed more Americans than terrorism has in the past 15 years, according to the VICE Mass Shooting Tracker.

      Yep.

    1. “But what we won’t do and should not do is take approaches that are going to be counterproductive. When I hear someone say we should carpet-bomb Iraq or Syria, not only is that inhumane, not only is that contrary to our values, that would likely be an extraordinary mechanism for ISIL to recruit more people willing to die and explode bombs in an airport or in a metro station. That’s not a smart strategy.”

      I'm really going to miss this president.

    2. “The notion that we should have surveillance of neighborhoods where Muslims are present — I just left a country that engages in that kind of neighborhood surveillance,” Obama said of his stop in Cuba before arriving in Argentina.

      Nice move.

    1. “a sincere objection to opting out of a legal requirement based on the knowledge that the government will then arrange for others to fulfill the requirement does not establish a substantial burden.”

      And I bet a comment that none of the Right wingers will directly address in their opinion(s).

    1. e Board hai

      test

    2. Information Illiteracy and Mass Market Writing Assessments

      Toggle to your class section to begin annotating.

    1. The reality —as Obama learned in the aftermath of the attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, Calif. — is that impressive battlefield statistics and reasoned calls for restraint mean little in the climate of fear generated by terror strikes.

      This seems to be the crux of the matter: doing what is actually right and what feels good: Obama aspires to the former, Bush to the latter.

    1. If we’re trying to help undergraduate writers enter the scholarly discourse, let’s allow their writing to look even more like academic writing.

      I've thought of essays looking professional, but I've not thought how footnotes add to that look.

    2. Why, then, aren’t we teaching first-year undergraduate writers to use footnotes?

      Good point.

  10. media.proquest.com.proxyau.wrlc.org media.proquest.com.proxyau.wrlc.org
    1. of Patchwriti

      test

    2. Chris M. Anso

      asdf

    3. Fraudulent Practices: Academic Misrepresentations of Plagiarism In the Name of Good Pedagogy

      Toggle over to your class section to begin annotating.

    1. Writing from Sources, Writing from Sentences

      Make sure you toggle to your class section to annotate. Go to WRTG 101 to see any annotations I may have made.

    1. Together the police charged the two surviving gunmen, and after a heavy barrage of fire, they killed the second before he could detonate his vest. The third gunman then blew himself up. In the end, it took four elite brigades to stop three gunmen, the report said

      Yet one armed "good guy," so goes the argument, could have stopped it?

    1. BEAM: A Rhetorical Vocabulary for Teaching Research-Based Writing

      Toggle to your classes to begin annotating.

    1. llege Board

      asdfasdf

    2. Information Illiteracy and Mass Market Writing Assessments

      Toggle to your class section to begin annotating.

    1. Helping Students Use Textual Sources Persuasively

      Remember to toggle to either WRTG 101 or your class section.

    1. ]” (205).

      Note the in-text citation. Why doesn't he put the source's name here?

    2. the disregard for Wikipedia appears to be on the de-cline,

      True. Teachers used to "ban" Wikipedia as a source, but really Bizup would argue that no good or bad source exists; only well-used or poorly used sources exist. Wikipedia works well for Background information. And, furthermore, Wikipedia probably is more up-to-date than old encyclopedias for obvious reasons.

    3. As James P. Purdy wri

      Textbook signal phrase.

    4. you

      He's writing directly to students. How does this change his approach to this essay? In other words, how would he approach this topic differently if he were writing to professors/teachers?

    5. Randall McClure
    1. BEAM: A Rhetorical Vocabularyfor Teaching Research-BasedWriting

      Toggle to WRTG 101 or your class section to annotate.