The notation of this code is not consistent with other exercises. Others have terminal prompts ($, >)

Typo

Consider using ISCB Personas to restrict this

A training material may be offered translated into different language

Currenlty we say used by OR referred to which conflates things. Separate the two merged intentions here by adding something like 'uses' to list datasets, tools etc

Add a description that specifies 'outlining the course'

Add LearningOutcomes field defines the things the learner will be able to do at the end of the course

Need to add an additional Abstract or Short Description to summate the course. This should be added through to Course Instance and Training Material too

Will this granularity in Harper be scoped or annotated? If someone could specify whether the learning resource type was a 'course', 'book', or 'tutorial' - it could help learners and potential re-users to filter results by their preference

Could this be done automatically? In TeSS we check each night whether the metadata has changed (and update if different) and whether the resource is still accessible (and indicate on TeSS if it is not)

This works nicely for git repo based sites. Is the intention that this solution could also be used for other platforms such as Wordpress or Drupal? If so, hosting this file in the right location might be a little more complex without guides.

An e-mail notification service might also be quite nice

I really like this idea! How would you group similar questions that are phrased differently together? Through lexical / named entity similarity with a human curation component? Or introducing some sort of controlled vocabulary term to help group by?

No 'why' in explanation

Author name

Author name

Event name

start date end date