272 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2016
  2. www.glottotopia.org www.glottotopia.org
    1. on

      one

    2. In order t

      Figure interrupts sentence

    3. n, and

      new sentence

    4. n b

      information

    5. there is always exactly one element in the Vorfeld indeclarative main clauses, the finite verb is in second position

      some sort of conditional nexus is missing here

    6. s

      Start new sentence here

    7. However, in principle the order of the dependents is

      The order of dependents, however, is in principle not determined

    8. So like the grammatical functions in theprevious figures, one can use explicit labels to this extent.

      The meaning of this sentence is unclear

    9. n

      ,

    10. t

      ,

    11. stage-de-

      unfortunate hyphenation as one might parse "stage de" as being French

    12. ‘’

      ist the asterisk a gloss?

    13. n

      italics?

    14. – for instance Word Grammar–

      asymmetric hyphens

    15. Since we

      again, tree in the middle of sentence

    16. Word Grammar

      The relationship between DG and Word Grammar is not clear at this point

    17. framework

      community

    18. was also led

      also took place

    19. though

      , though,

    20. that is,

      that is the third "that is" in three pages. Try to vary

    21. valence is a nominative NP (the subject) and an accusative NP (an object).

      Its valence is two NPs? Are "arguments" intended?

    22. verb

      what is the Figure doing in the middle of the sentence???

    23. their case

      this is true for dependent-marking languages. The criterion "determines other's form" would work the other way round in head-marking languages

    24. central concept of Dependency Grammar is valence (see Section1.6). The central

      "central...central." Repetition

    25. En-glish, Finnish, German,

      all these languages are already mentioned in the list above

    26. ).

      All the content above could go into a timeline or other float "Historical development of Dependency Grammar"

    27. n,

      use semicolon to make the levels of coordination clearer

    28. have

    29. ,

      . or ;

    30. fiercly

      fiercely

    31. It seems strange to give a long overview of the history of the field before actually showing what DG is about. The long list of names is tiresome to read, and my guess is that everyone would skip it.

    32. worked on Machine Translation in the Soviet Union (Mel’čuk1964)

      repeated from middle of page 361

    33. was established

      was only established

    34. there has been work

      work has been done

    35. VilmosÁgel(2000), Kassel; KlausBaumgärtner(1965,1970), Leipzig laterStuttgart; UlrichEngel(1977,2014), IDS Mannheim; Hans-WernerEroms(1985,1987,2000), Passau; Heinz Happ, Tübingen; PeterHellwig(1978,2003), Heidelberg; JürgenHeringer(1996), Augsburg; JürgenKunze(1968,1975), Berlin; HenningLobin(1993),Gießen; KlausSchubert(1987), Hildesheim; Heinz JosefWeber(1997), Trier; KlausWelke(1988,2011), Humboldt University Berlin; EdeltraudWerner(1993), Halle-Wittenberg.

      a table would seem like a more appropriate device to present this information.

    36. list provides a probably incomplete list

      list provides a list; poor style

    37. , EastGermany,

      why is it specified that Leipzig is in the East, but Mannheim is not said to be in the West two lines down?

    38. Soviet Union towards Canada in the 1970s and now works in Montréal.

      in how far is this relevant for the theory?

    39. Mel’čuk

      check spelling of this name everywhere

    40. Igor A. Meľčuk, A. K. Žolkovskij worked since the1960s in the Soviet Union

      use present perfect if the work is still ongoing. Otherwise give the end date.

    41. Meaning–text theory

      weird capitalization

    42. (Sgall, Hajičová, Panevova)

      should this link to publications? Which years?

    43. dependency gram

      capitalize

    44. Ajdukiewicz’

      Ajdukiewicz’s

  3. Dec 2015
  4. Nov 2015
  5. Aug 2015
    1. -:1first person (ach,ch,sp)nominal inflection, possession14-:2

      check spacing for _1 and _2

    2. achindicates the Azángaro-Chocos-Huangáscar dialect;amv, Apurí-Madeán-Viñac;ch, Cacra-Hongos;lt, Lincha-Tana;sp, San Pedro de Huacarpana.

      maybe use table for this

  6. Jul 2015
    1. Labov 1972a : xi

      Use parentheses

    2. Contents 1 The Separation of the Social and the Linguistic

      do not use special capitalization. Titles should be in normal case, i.e. normally lower case

  7. Jun 2015
    1. Stefan Müller. 2015. Grammatical theory : From transformational grammar to constraint-based approaches (Textbooks in Language Sciences 1). Berlin: Language Science Press. This title can be downloaded at: http://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/14

      wrong URL

    2. e

      Plural

    3. ra

      lower case

    1. attributing

      "attributing" sounds strange. Maybe "push", "shift" or another verb of transfer?

    2. n 2

      .\footnote

    3. undergone changes

      changed

    4. proponents of the various schools

      one can be a proponent of an idea or of a theory, but not of a school.

  8. May 2015
    1. edible

      lekker

    2. both fields are never simultaneously occupie

      these fields are never both occupied

    3. PR

      smallcaps

    4. smallcaps

    5. n

      North

    6. 1.8 A topological model of the German clause Table 1.1 : Examples of how topological fields can be occupied Prefield Left bracket Middle field Right bracket Postfield Karl schläft. Karl hat geschlafen. Karl erkennt Maria. Karl ärbt den Mantel um den Maria kennt. Karl hat Maria erkannt. Karl hat Maria als sie aus dem Zug stieg sofort erkannt. Karl hat Maria sofort erkannt als sie aus dem Zug stieg. Karl hat Maria zu erkennen behauptet. Karl hat behauptet Maria zu erkennen. Schläft Karl? Schlaf! Iss jetzt dein Eis auf! Hat er doch das ganze Eis alleine gegessen. weil er das ganze Eis alleine gegessen hat ohne mit der Wimper zu zucken. weil er das ganze Eis alleine essen können will ohne gestört zu werden. wer das ganze Eis alleine gegessen hat der das ganze Eis alleine gegessen hat mit wem du geredet hast mit dem du

      tables should use \lsptoprule and \lspbottomrule

    7. remainders?

    8. Contents 3.1.3 The T-Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 3.1.4 Phonetic Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 3.1.5 Logical Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 3.1.6 The Lexicon

      decapitalize Lexicon

    9. Please cite final version.

      Better: "do not cite this version. The final version will be available at $URL"

    10. ics ( Lieb 1983 ; Eisenberg 2004 ; Nolda 2007 ), Optimality Theory ( Prince & Smolensky 1993 , Grimshaw 1997 , G. Müller 2000a ),

      first parens have semicolon, second parens have comma. Be consistent

    11. Transformational gr

      either both T and G capitalized, or neither.

    1. rphological categories commonly expressed via stem alterna- tions § 4.1.2 three-way number distinction in personal pronouns and verb agreement § 6.1 , § 8.1.1 irregular distinction between attributive and predicative adjec- tives

      better raggedright in tables and avoid hyphenation

    2. throughout Chapters 5 through 9

      double through is a bit ugly

    3. Wilbur, Joshua. A grammar of Pite Saami

      The other books in this series should be listed here