6 Matching Annotations
- Apr 2020
-
-
Suddenly even linking to data was an excuse to get raided by the FBI and potentially face serious charges. Even more concerning is that Brown linked to data that was already public and others had already linked to.
-
Having said all that, I think this is completely absurd that I have to write an entire article justifying the release of this data out of fear of prosecution or legal harassment. I had wanted to write an article about the data itself but I will have to do that later because I had to write this lame thing trying to convince the FBI not to raid me.
-
I could have released this data anonymously like everyone else does but why should I have to? I clearly have no criminal intent here. It is beyond all reason that any researcher, student, or journalist have to be afraid of law enforcement agencies that are supposed to be protecting us instead of trying to find ways to use the laws against us.
-
The key change here is the removal of an intent to defraud and replacing it with willfully; it will be illegal to share this information as long as you have any reason to know someone else might use it for unauthorized computer access.It is troublesome to consider the unintended consequences resulting from this small change.
-
The problem is that it is that the laws themselves change the very definition of a criminal and put many innocent professionals at risk.
Tags
- intent to commit/facilitate a crime
- unreasonable
- journalist rights
- good intentions
- don't turn innocent people into criminals (through bad laws)
- liability
- absurd
- unfortunate policies/laws
- researcher rights
- unintended consequence
- collateral damage/impact
- outrageous
- fear of prosecution/legal harassment
- a government for the people?
- chilling effect
- laws/law enforcement agencies are supposed to be protecting us
Annotators
URL
-