Scharlau, Winfried. 2008. “Who Is Alexander Grothendieck?” Notices of the AMS 55(8): 930–41. https://www.ams.org/notices/200808/tx080800930p.pdf (March 21, 2026).
11 Matching Annotations
- Last 7 days
-
www.ams.org www.ams.org
-
-
Allyn Jackson, “Comme appelé du néant—As ifsummoned from the void: The life of Alexandre Gro-thendieck”, Notices, October 2004 and November 2004.Grothendieck around 1936 in the garden of the Heydorn’shouse in Hamburg-Blankenese.Archive of Winfried Scharlau.
this seems to be more of the sort of biography of Grothendieck that I'd be interested in reading.
-
This isn't what I might have expected. It focuses on Grothendieck's early life, a hint of his mathematics, and then his later unravelling and mentions of texts he wrote later in life which sound of a philosophic nature, but in the manner of a crazed person. Curious, but I'm not inclined to go read them.
The author seems hopeful about these works, but doesn't provide any pointers or proof of their importance beyond the fact that they're well written. All his evidence seems to indicate they're more meandering and don't have solid themes or points.
-
Grothendieck’s main activity with regard tothese goals was the foundation of a group initiallycalled Survivre and later on Survivre et Vivre:SURVIVREMouvement international pour la surviede l’espèce humaineAn international and interprofessionalmovement for the survival of humanity
-
Shortly after his official letter of resignation,on June 26, 1970, Grothendieck gave a lecture tohundreds of listeners at the University of Paris inOrsay in which he talked about all that had becomeimportant to him: the spread of nuclear weapons,the arms race, the threat to humanity posed bytechnological progress. He went so far as to callmathematical research dangerous because it ispart of this technological progress. The content ofthis lecture was later circulated in various unof-ficial manuscripts under titles such as “Respon-sabilité du savant dans le monde d’aujourd’hui: Lesavant et l’appareil militaire” (“The Responsibilityof Scientists in Today’s World: The Scientist andthe Military Establishment”).
-
he may have believed that hehad passed his peak and that thence-forth he would be able only to repeathimself with less effectiveness.
a problem that haunts many searchers...
-
Comments in this direction havealso been made by the physicist David Ruelle, acolleague of Grothendieck’s at the IHES: After asuperhuman effort, Grothendieck had to admitthat he would never be able to complete the oeuvrehe had begun. It was as if he had set his mind onbuilding a cathedral with his own hands. When thewalls were two meters high, he had to stop.
-
For a while he identified withthe stigmatized Catholic nunMarthe Robin, who claimedto have lived for thirty yearson the Eucharist alone.
-
At the 1966 InternationalCongress of Mathematicians, Grothendieck wasawarded the Fields Medal.
-
Grothendieck began working on theEléments de Géométrie Algébrique (EGA) and heldthe legendary Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique(SGA
-
This systematic rebuildingpermitted the solution of deep number-theoreticproblems, among them the final step in the proofof the Weil Conjectures by Deligne, the proof ofthe Mordell Conjecture by Faltings, and the solu-tion of Fermat’s Last Problem by Wiles.
consequences of Grothendieck
Tags
- repetition
- Jean Dieudonné
- Jean-Pierre Serre
- mathematics
- responsibility
- Laurent Schwartz
- lectures
- peaking
- Allyn Jackson
- Alexander Grothendieck
- Survivre et Vivre
- quotes
- environmentalism
- Winfried Scharlau
- Marthe Robin
- Catholic nuns
- Weil Conjectures
- References
- biographies
- want to read
- number theory
- pierre cartier
- ecology
- algebraic geometry
- Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique (SGA)
- Fermat's Last Problem
- read
- 1966
- student revolution (1968)
- Mordell Conjecture
- David Ruelle
- cathedrals
- survival of humanity
- quote
- Fields Medal
- military–industrial complex
- Eléments de Géométrie Algébrique (EGA)
Annotators
URL
-