Presently, convention dictates that 100% of fossil carbon is counted but only a third of LULUCF carbon is counted
for - question - why does the GHG accounting convention have this inconsistency in the first place?
Presently, convention dictates that 100% of fossil carbon is counted but only a third of LULUCF carbon is counted
for - question - why does the GHG accounting convention have this inconsistency in the first place?
reading and writing naturally come after speaking only because speaking follows closely on the heels of understanding yeah so what do you focus on build your understanding
for - language training - answer - to - question - about listening and speaking first
comments - In human evolution, speaking and listening came long before reading and writing. - Our written language is based on sequential phonetic sounds of our spoken language, so it naturally makes sense to learn the spoken language first
you're just doing listening and we're later gonna do speaking when are we gonna do reading and writing how
for - question - language training - ALG - listening and speaking first - when does reading and writing appear?
we go from first person to second person to third person to Fourth to fifth to sixth person perspective those are actual cognitive structures
for - question - what is meant by first to sixth person perspective? Can he give examples of each? - John Churchill
What's the structure of the URL of a shared link?https://chat.openai.com/share/<conversation-ID>
I've never seen a website document something like this before... especially as part of a FAQ.
How/why is this information helpful to people?
authenticproblem solving
This phrase caught my attention and I may need more guidance. How is "authentic problem solving" different from problem solving?
I'm thinking about the context of this article. Since the title is "Real-World Learning Framework," my guess is that authentic has something to do with the real world.
The main problem here is that the problem itself is a little bit poorly defined.
the two questions that we hopefully would uh try to answer with with this r d program is and and one of this i already 00:56:53 mentioned but out of all conceivable designs for societal systems so so so this isn't about capitalism versus socialism or something like that there's like i would think there's an unlimited 00:57:05 potential we're creative we're creative people there would be a million varieties of of societal systems and integrated societal systems that we might come up with 00:57:17 and some of those probably would work very well and some of them probably would work very poorly um so among those what what might be among the best and not the the single best that's not the purpose either it's not just to find one thing that works is 00:57:30 to find like a you know more of a a variety a process of things a mix mishmash of things that community the communities can choose to implement that you know 00:57:43 works well for them and that suits them and that works well for their neighbors and works well forever it works well for the whole really
Two questions to answer:
This requires careful consideration. There cannot be complete autonomy, as lack of standards will make things very challenging for any inter-community cooperation.
Cosmolocal framework (https://clreader.net) as well as Indyweb Interpersonal computing could mediate discussion between different community nodes and emerge common ground