2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2022
  2. www.medrxiv.org www.medrxiv.org
    https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/10.1101/2021.06.11.21258690
    1
    1. chaeyeonlim 08 Jan 2022

      Douaud, G., Lee, S., Alfaro-Almagro, F., Arthofer, C., Wang, C., McCarthy, P., Lange, F., Andersson, J. L. R., Griffanti, L., Duff, E., Jbabdi, S., Taschler, B., Winkler, A. M., Nichols, T. E., Collins, R., Matthews, P. M., Allen, N., Miller, K. L., & Smith, S. M. (2021). Brain imaging before and after COVID-19 in UK Biobank (p. 2021.06.11.21258690). https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.11.21258690

      is:preprint lang:en COVID-19 brain imaging UK biobank research pathology neurotropism neuroinflammation infection multimodal MRI functional brain scan comparison
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.11.21258690v3
  3. Nov 2021
  4. Local file Local file
    Untitled document
    1
    1. Mark_C_Harris 27 Nov 2021
      (the VTA is also part ofthis system, but is too small to image with standard fMRImethods, but see [35] for successful imaging methods).

      All imaging studies face questions of validity and should (and many do) link to comprehensive details on instrumentation, methodology, and interpretation. Apparently, the professional consensus remains that, properly executed and interpreted, fMRI and other functional imaging techniques based on detection of oxygenation can lead to highly valid conclusions. (See Nautil.us article.)

      brain imaging fMRI functional imaging validity research methodology oxygenation

    Tags

    Annotators