- Dec 2022
-
www.thenation.com www.thenation.com
-
At its most tame, Ancient Apocalypse simply reinforces a deeply conservative understanding of human history. Conservative, yes, because despite Hancock’s claim to challenge every orthodoxy going, his ideas—like those of Ignatius Loyola Donnelly, Erich von Däniken, and other so-called “pseudo-archaeologists”—rest on a baseline assumption that technology should always be advancing in linear fashion, from primitive simplicity to modern complexity.
There is a broad, conservative baseline assumption within much of archaeology that technology always proceeds in a linear fashion from primitive simplicity to modern complexity.
Archaeologists and historians need to watch carefully for this cognitive bias.
-
- May 2022
-
via3.hypothes.is via3.hypothes.is
-
“This technique alsoexplains why I don’t think at all linearly and have trouble finding the right sequence ofchapters when writing a book, because indeed every chapter must reappear in everyother.”22
- Luhmann, Archimedes und wir , 145.
Luhmann indicated that his note taking system made it difficult for him to be a linear thinker. Instead he felt that each chapter he wrote "must reappear in every other."
This seems quite similar to Carl Linnaeus' work which he regularly recycled into future works.
-
- Feb 2022
-
Local file Local file
-
There is one reliable sign if you managedto structure your workflow according to the fact that writing is not alinear process, but a circular one: the problem of finding a topic isreplaced by the problem of having too many topics to write about.
Writing is a circular generative process and not a finite, linear one.
-
- Jul 2021
-
delong.typepad.com delong.typepad.com
-
There is no inactive learning, just as there is no inactive reading.
This underlies the reason why the acceleration of the industrial revolution has applied to so many areas, but doesn't apply to the acceleration of learning.
Learning is a linear process.
-