8 Matching Annotations
- Aug 2024
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
Monopoly is not played on a cartesian plane. It's played on a directed circular graph. Therefore, it is inappropriate to use the Euclidean distance metric to compare the distances between places on the board. We must instead use minimum path lengths. Example: If we used Euclidean distance, then you would have to agree that the distance between, say, Go and Jail is equal to the distance between the Short Line and the Pennsylvania Railroad. Clearly, this is not the intention. In your example, the "nearest railroad" would be the railroad square having the shortest path from wherever you stand. With the game board representing a directed graph, there are no "backwards" paths. Thus, the distance from the pink Chance square to the Reading railroad is not 2. It's 38.
-
- Apr 2021
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
(Yes, I realize from a technical, end-user perspective this really doesn't matter.)
The word "technical" in this sentence doesn't seem to belong or to clarify anything. I think it would be clearer without it.
But I think I understand what he's saying, which is that technical details don't matter to the end user. They only know/see/care if it works or not.
-
- Feb 2021
-
trailblazer.to trailblazer.to
-
The Subprocess macro will go through all outputs of the nested activity, query their semantics and search for tracks with the same semantic.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Jan 2021
-
www.zdnet.com www.zdnet.com
-
I think some of the design details are insane (I dislike the binary logs, for example), but those are details, not big issues.
-
-
discourse.ubuntu.com discourse.ubuntu.com
-
Most users frankly don’t care how software is packaged. They don’t understand the difference between deb / rpm / flatpak / snap. They just want a button that installs Spotify so they can listen to their music.
-
- Dec 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
I don't think this is what really matters at the end, since whatever is the implementation the goal should be to provide a library that people actually like to use.
-
- Apr 2020
-
medium.com medium.com
-
Running the same code in the browser and on the server in order to avoid code duplication is a very different problem. It is simply a matter of good development practices to avoid code duplication. This however is not limited to isomorphic applications. A utility library such as Lodash is “universal”, but has nothing to do with isomorphism. Sharing code between environments does not give you an isomorphic application. What we’re referring to with Universal JavaScript is simply the fact that it is JavaScript code which is environment agnostic. It can run anywhere. In fact most JavaScript code will run fine on any JavaScript platform.
-
Having the server render the HTML on first page load is the functional part, the thing that provides for a better user experience. The technical part is where we use the same code in both environments, which no user ever asked for, but makes a developer’s life easier (at least in theory).
-