So this first one is a technical distinction whereas the second and third are more pedagogical. But what occurred to me in reading this list of rationales was the way in which those pedagogical choices are effected by the tech we choose.

mention CCSS

web annotation as close reading web annotation as promoting digital literacies

code for Common Core?

focus on STEM in tertiary grant making

annotation as active learning

discussion in the sci classroom v lecture

Based on curation of this article, CTD states that:

• resveratrol has known or potential therapeutic role in peritonitis
• an inferred role in peritonitis based on gene C5

Interesting that with the problems reported with NK-kB antibodies, the exact primary antibody is not mentioned here.

Would like to be able to easily look up an article from Pub Med or Google Scholar and insert the link, as I did below.

No information provided about antibody used here. Concerns about the specificity of many primary antibodies against NF-kB have been documented in:

Herkenham et al. (2011) doi:10.1186/1742-2094-8-141.

Slotta et al. 2014: doi:10.1369/0022155413515484

Would like to be able to perform a lookup from the Antibody Registry to see whether this antibody has an RRID. In this case, although not enough information was provided, it is likely that this antibody is: RRID:AB_2271047, as it is the only mouse antibody in Santa Cruz' catalog against this protein. But that is really insufficient information. So perhaps we would we able to open up a channel with the author to ask them to provide more information.

Would like to be able to automatically insert the link and some language around it, if an RRID is available. See annotation below.

This antibody may have RRID:AB_627545 but information may not be accurate as insufficient metadata was provided.

This antibody may have RRID:AB_2271047 but information may not be accurate as insufficient metadata was provided.

Or could embed the NIF navigator within H:

NIF has the following type of information available about Resveratrol:

• Annotation(45,733)
• Brain Activation Foci(552)
• Clinical Trials(190)
• Dataset(114)
• Disease(1,243,446)
• Drugs(637,343)
• Expression(200,724)
• Grants(444)
• Images(31)
• Microarray(200,765)
• Multimedia(37)
• Phenotype(8)

More information on resveratrol can be found at:

1. CTD

I'm not an expert, so I am taking them at their word. The interesting this is how CTD took the results of this paper and inferred that there was a link between a drug and a disease. It involves a chain of reasoning that says, as best as I can tell in this short exercise: This study shows an effect RSV on pathways involved in C5-induced inflammation, a mouse model of acute peritonitis. Various drugs interact with C5, therefore they are inferred to have an effect on peritonitis. I have to do some more digging, but this will be a challenge to model in an annotation.

The Antibody Registry lists at least 11 antibodies from different vendors that have this description, so could not assign an RRID

The Antibody Registry currently lists at least 5 different antibodies meeting this description, so cannot annotate to an RRID.

Claim 1

According to the NIF annotation database, the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database has annotated this article with 54 chemical-gene associations. I'm going to try to track them down.