2 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. We performed a trial of retinal gene augmentation in the Pde6a mutant dog using Pde6a delivery by capsid-mutant adeno-associated virus serotype 8, previously shown to have a rapid onset of transgene expression in the canine retina. Subretinal injections were performed in 10 dogs at 29–44 days of age, and electroretinography and vision testing were performed to assess functional outcome. Retinal structure was assessed using color fundus photography, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and histology. Immunohistochemistry was performed to examine transgene expression and expression of other retinal genes. Treatment resulted in improvement in dim light vision and evidence of rod function on electroretinographic examination. Photoreceptor layer thickness in the treated area was preserved compared with the contralateral control vector treated or uninjected eye. Improved rod and cone photoreceptor survival, rhodopsin localization, cyclic GMP levels and bipolar cell dendrite distribution was observed in treated areas. Some adverse effects including foci of retinal separation, foci of retinal degeneration and rosette formation were identified in both AAV-Pde6a and control vector injected regions.

      ExperimentName: Rescue of Pde6a-mutant Cardigan Welsh Corgi dogs with canine Pde6a

      RescueModel: Canis lupus familiaris

      GeneAlteration: The model harbors a homozygous 1-bp deletion variant at codon 616 that results in a frameshift and a premature stop codon (previously reported in PMID: 10393029 and PMID: 18775863).

      RescueVariant: Rescue was performed with wild-type canine Pde6a delivered by AAV8 and expressed under the CMV-chicken beta-actin promoter, in comparison to a GFP control.

      RescuePhenotype: HP:0030474 (Undetectable dark-adapted electroretinogram), HP:0000505 (Visual impairment), HP:0007843 (Attenuation of retinal blood vessels), HP:0030610 (Photoreceptor outer segment loss on macular OCT)

      RescueMethod: Rescue was performed by subretinal injection of AAV8 particles delivering wild-type canine Pde6a or GFP cDNA (Figures 4, 5, and 6).

      RescueEvidence: Rod ERG response shows improvement from undetectable to detectable following AAV-Pde6a injection (Fig. 1). Visual impairment also improved according to visual navigation ability (Fig. 2). Attenuation of retinal blood vessels was prevented as well (Fig. 3). Photoreceptor outer nuclear layer thickness was preserved (Fig. 4). Finally, treatment promoted rod photoreceptor survival (Fig. 5).

      ModelVariant: The model does not harbor a variant equivalent to one from the human patients, but rather has a naturally occurring frameshift variant disrupting Pde6a leading to full loss-of-function.

    1. Three-week-old C57BL/6JRd9/Boc and Rpgr−/y mice were treated with unilateral (nRd9 = 18, nko = 24) or bilateral (treatment versus sham, nRd9 = 17, nko = 20) injections (1.5 × 109 vg in 1.5 μL). Immunohistochemistry of unfixed cryosections showed that the antibody detecting human RPGR does not cross-react with the orthologous Rpgr in C57BL/6J wild-type mice (Figure 4). More importantly, it demonstrated RPGR transgene expression and co-localization with the ciliary protein Rpgrip1 in the treated eye of C57BL/6JRd9/Boc and Rpgr−/y mice, but not the control eye. In the longitudinal ERG analyses, both animal models of XLRP showed significant rescue of the dominating rod system at 6 months, the last time point studied (Figure 5). Rpgr−/y mice also showed a significant rescue of cone function under light-adapted conditions, whereas the responses in C57BL/6JRd9/Boc mice showed a trend for efficacy, which did not reach the significance level in light-adapted conditions at this time point. Some of the measures at earlier time points also showed significant therapeutic effects or a trend for efficacy again especially at higher stimulus intensities (Figures S9 and S10). It is important to note that ERG responses from treated eyes versus untreated eyes (intra-individual comparison) showed significant rescue with the therapeutic AAV vector in both animal models at 4 and 6 months of age. However, when mice were treated with the therapeutic vector in one eye and the control vector in the other, variability increased as a result of having surgery performed on both sides. This contributed to variability in the ERG signals. Importantly, all responses from the treated eyes were still always greater than those from the control treated eyes. However, the significance threshold was only met in Rpgr−/y mice at 6 months.

      ExperimentName: Rescue of Rpgr-deficient mice with human RPGR

      RescueModel: Mus musculus

      GeneAlteration: The Rpgr−/y mouse model was constructed with targeted hemizygous (male) disruption of the mouse Rpgr gene by insertion of a neomycin resistance cassette to replace exons 4 through 6 and generate a null variant (PMID: 10725384).

      RescueVariant: Rescue was performed with wild-type human RPGR.

      RescuePhenotype: HP:0030612 (Abnormal retinal morphology on macular OCT), partial mislocalization of blue and green cone opsins to the inner segment, reduced rhodopsin content in the outer segment, HP:0000546 (Retinal degeneration), HP:0030609 (Photoreceptor layer loss on macular OCT), HP:0030610 (Photoreceptor outer segment loss on macular OCT), disorganization of disk membranes, normal connecting cilia morphology, HP:0030483 (Reduced amplitude of dark-adapted bright flash electroretinogram a-wave), HP:0008275 (Abnormal light-adapted electroretinogram)

      RescueMethod: Rescue was performed by subretinal injection of AAV8 particles delivering wild-type human RPGR (Figure 5).

      RescueEvidence: ERG analyses show significant rescue of rod function and a rescue of cone function that is trending towards statistical significance (Figures 5B and 5C).

      ModelVariant: The model does not harbor a variant equivalent to one from the human patients, but rather has targeted disruption of Rpgr leading to full loss-of-function.