13 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Associations of distinct sedentary behaviors with cortical, subcortical, and white matter hyperintensity volumes: Evidence from the ARIC study
      • Study Overview:
        • Published in Alzheimer's & Dementia, this ARIC study examined ~1,700 adults (midlife average age ~53) over 20+ years using brain MRIs to assess how different sedentary behaviors impact long-term brain structure.
      • Heavy Television Viewing Impact:
        • Adults reporting "very often" TV watching in midlife showed significantly smaller brain volumes in regions associated with Alzheimer's disease, as well as reduced frontal and occipital lobe volumes (governing executive functioning and visual processing).
        • Frequent TV viewing correlated with higher volumes of white matter hyperintensities (WMH), an indicator of cerebral small blood vessel disease and increased dementia/stroke risk.
      • Disconnect Between TV and Occupational Sitting:
        • The physical act of sitting itself is not the primary driver of brain atrophy; participants with high occupational (workplace) sitting showed lower WMH volumes and larger frontal/occipital brain volumes.
        • The contrast suggests that mentally engaging sitting (e.g., problem-solving at work) offers neuroprotective benefits, whereas passive sitting (e.g., watching TV) lacks cognitive stimulation.
      • Risk Factors & Sex Differences:
        • Structural changes associated with high TV consumption persisted even after adjusting for physical activity, smoking, alcohol, BMI, and diabetes.
        • The observed structural brain changes from both TV viewing and occupational sitting were notably more pronounced in men than in women.
  2. Jan 2026
    1. Blood biomarkers have emerged as accurate tools for detecting Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology, offering a minimally invasive alternative to traditional diagnostic methods such as imaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis.

      States as given that blood tests are accurate tools for detecting Alzheimer's.

    2. Yet, further refinement of collection and analytical protocols is needed to fully translate this approach to be viable and useful as a clinical tool.

      However, not yet at the stage this can be used as a clinical tool for diagnostics.

    3. indings underscore the potential of dried blood collection and capillary blood as a minimally invasive, scalable approach for AD biomarker testing in research settings

      For research dried capillary blood collection is useful and minimally invasive.

    4. DROP-AD project investigates the potential of dried plasma spot (DPS) and dried blood spot (DBS) analysis, derived from capillary blood, for detecting AD biomarkers,

      The project this paper is a result of looks at the utility of dried blood spots and plasma spots for analysis.

    5. Yet, the logistics surrounding venipuncture for blood collection, although considerably simpler than the acquisition of imaging and CSF, require precise processing and storage specific to AD biomarkers that are still guided by medical personnel. Consequently, limitations in their widescale use in research and broader clinical implementation exist. T

      Problem statement is that while blood tests are an easy method, there are limits on widescale use, due to some specific cares needing to be taken in the process.

    1. A home bloodtest has been developed at Göteborg Uni with international partners, to check for brain changes 10-20yrs before any dementia symptoms become apparent. This chimes w. other research I saw wrt changes in banking transactions 10yr before symptoms, and early changes in the spatial brain. Can I find publications? The .se researcher is Henrik Zetterberg

  3. Oct 2025
  4. Mar 2021
    1. Nice review of network-based studies on neurodegenerative diseases. It shows the main findings of studies using network-based approaches. However, it does not generate a particular perspective on the main problems to solve, future directions (beyond more network-based studies and experimental validation), methodological issues or competing perspectives, etc

  5. Mar 2018
  6. Aug 2017