15 Matching Annotations
- Last 7 days
-
radanskoric.com radanskoric.com
-
If I decide to add it, which solution should I pick, battle tested Sorbet or core team endorsed RBS?
-
- Sep 2023
-
modoboa.org modoboa.orgModoboa1
-
use the services of free email providers (Gmail, Live, Yahoo...) which are limited and your data is used for commercial purposes. Install your own email server, which requires important technical knowledge to setup and configure the system.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Jan 2023
-
-
Diet YAML is a light weight version of YAML that removes much of the complex aspects of the mainline YAML specification.
-
- Jun 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
There are many projects that does not use the master branch as default. For example, Next.js uses the canary branch, the npm CLI and many more other projects uses stuff like prod, production, dev, develop, release, beta, head.
-
- Apr 2021
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
The use of U+212B 'Angstrom sign', which was encoded due to round-trip mapping compatibility with an East-Asian character encoding, is discouraged, and the preferred representation is U+00C5 'capital letter A with ring above', which has the same glyph.
Is there a difference in semantic meaning between the two? And if so, what is it? 
-
- Mar 2021
-
css-tricks.com css-tricks.com
-
I’d say if the form is short and an obvious pattern (like sign up or log in), you could use the placeholder visual pattern, but use real labels instead.
-
- Feb 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
@adisos if reform-rails will not match, I suggest to use: https://github.com/orgsync/active_interaction I've switched to it after reform-rails as it was not fully detached from the activerecord, code is a bit hacky and complex to modify, and in overall reform not so flexible as active_interaction. It has multiple params as well: https://github.com/orgsync/active_interaction/blob/master/spec/active_interaction/modules/input_processor_spec.rb#L41
I'm not sure what he meant by:
fully detached from the activerecord I didn't think it was tied to ActiveRecord.
But I definitely agree with:
code is a bit hacky and complex to modify
Tags
- evaluating software options
- active_interaction
- recommended software
- hard to understand
- too complicated
- switching/migrating to something different
- pointing out gaps/downsides/cons in competition/alternatives
- too coupled/dependent
- I agree
- recommended option/alternative
- flexibility
- reform (Ruby)
Annotators
URL
-
- Jan 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
Seems like I would trust https://github.com/AdonisLau/axios-jsonp more than this, since https://github.com/AdonisLau/axios-jsonp has more users...
Would be interesting to see a comparison or a reason why/when might prefer this project.
-
- Dec 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
Some devs prefer Svelte’s minimal approach that defers problems to userland, encouraging more innovation, choice, and fragmentation, and other devs prefer a more fully integrated toolkit with a well-supported happy path.
tag?: what scope of provided features / recommended happy path is needed?
-
- Nov 2020
-
uxdesign.cc uxdesign.cc
-
Secondary buttons are the alternative we give users to the primary action.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
There are actually 3 other libraries that implements material in svelte, i hope this to become the community favorite because using MDC underneath it implements correctly Material guidelines.
-
- Oct 2020
-
-
I recommend folks use https://github.com/shama/bel instead of this package; we've been working hard on it for the past two years to make sure it has all the features you could want to write inline HTML. Hope it's good; closing for now!
-
- Sep 2020
-
medium.com medium.com
-
For the past couple of years in particular however, I’ve stopped using Webpack to develop them, opting instead to use Rollup as my primary bundler for apps.
-
- Aug 2020
-
developer.mozilla.org developer.mozilla.org
-
In these cases, a recursive setTimeout() pattern is preferred:
-
- Jul 2020
-
amp.dev amp.dev
-
Although specifying the ⚡ is the recommended approach
-