In vitro cytotoxic activity of methanolic extract of N. sativafrom different germination phasesduringSRB assay

Prevalence of extracellular virulence factors in Vibriofrom shrimp farm

MAR indexingand antibiotic resistance pattern amon

Antibiotic resistance amongVibriofrom shrimp farm

Antibiotic resistance amongVibriofrom Cochin estu

Species level identification and distribution of Vibriospecies in Cochin estuary

Active site identification, metal detection and interaction of Dof domain structure

Superposition of the Dof domain with predicted 3D structure

Validation of the predicted 3D structure

Tertiary structural prediction

Chromosomal locations

Phylogenetic and motif analysi

In silico characterization of cloned Dof gene

Phylogenetic and motif analysis of sequenced Dof domains

In silico characterization of sequenced Dof domains of cereal

Sequencing of Dof domain and gene

Cloning of Dof genes of sorghum using pBSK vector

Cloning of Dof domain and Dof genes using pGEM-T Easy

Gel elution of PCR products

PCR based cloning, sequencing and in silico characterization of Dof domain and Dofgenes of cereals and millet

PCR amplification of Dof gene

Primer designing for PCR amplification of Dof domain and Do

Immunological Responses (DTH, mitogenic and Leishmania-specific cellular responses)

rLdTPR was cloned, overexpressed, purified and antibody rais

2D QSAR

The table 6.1 gives the mixing probabilities and the associated parametricvalues fork(number of components) = 2,3, and 4. It may be noted thatthe Log likelihood value is smaller fork= 4 (the results fork= 5 , 6 etc.are not better than that fork= 4 and hence are not given here). The fourcomponents Poisson Mixture model is given in table 6.2. It may be notedthat 58% of wards may have higher incidence/relative risk and the remainingwards have lesser/lower incidence for the Cancer disease. We computed theposterior probability for each component for each ward (see table 6.3). Eachward is assigned to a particular component so that the posterior probability islarger. These results are also given in table 6.3 Finally we present Choroplethmaps based on those results

Haemolymph protein profile

Helicoverpa armiger

Spodoptera litura

Gut enzyme profile

Utilization of VS by the prey

Influence of prey on VS yield

Quantification of protein of VS yielded in the prey deprivation

Survival (SR) and venom milking rate (VMR

Venomous saliva optimization

Mandibular stylet

Increments in biomass:

Residual nutrients

Chlorophyll content in waters:

Growth maximum values

Rates of growth (OD678/day

Growth

Yield and its component traits:

Differences among cultivars for yield, biomass and HI

Vaccination improved the Chemokine receptor CCR1, CCR3, CCR9 and Toll like receptor TLR2, TLR4 and TLR9 expression in HBsAgpositive newborns compared to healthy newborns.

IFN γ production by CD8 T cells upon stimulation with PMA and viral peptides

Pre-vaccination:Lower Chemokine and Toll like receptor expression in HBsAgpositive newborns:

T cell phenotypic distribution in HBsAgPositive, HBsAgNegative from HBsAg positive mothers and healthy newborns.

Somatotype Categories:

somatotype Categories:

somatotype Categories:

Range of Component Ratings:

Somatocharts:

Mean Somatotypes:

SOMATOTYPE DISTRIBUTION OF RURAL SAMPLE

Somatocharts: