260 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2015
    1. It is a matter of how personsand their social and cultural worlds are inseparable, thoroughly

      Continued onto the next page. This the definition of distributed cognition: "Their thinking is irreducible to individual properties, intelligence, or traits.

    2. First of all, it facilitates acritical redefinition of these children's households as settings thatcontain ample cultural and intellectual resources. These householdsare not intellectually barren, socially disorganized, or part of somesort of apathetic and passive, if not pathological, "underclass";norare they lacking in cognitive resources or in the family's capacities todevelop, acquire, or use knowledge

      This is, as indicated above, a move against "deficit" based education ideology for non-white students from lower class backgrounds. Instead, we must see value in the interactions of the household, and use them to inform classroom practice.

    3. This lesson, and this classroom, represent acomplex, and collective, zone of proximal development, to use Vy-gotsky's (1978) metaphor

      Zone of proximal development theory applied here. Therefore, is this the only theoretical lens that Moll, et al's distributed cognition can be used in?

    4. hrough their studies, the childrenused their developing knowledge about wars of the past to understanda war of the present

      I can see this viewed through an LPP lens too. Here is the (re)production of a community of practice in many ways.

    5. In particular,it illustrates how children form a social network wherein they ex-change funds of knowledge within a classroom context in a mannersimilar to, although much more concentrated than, that in the house-holds in our study

      This is the connection they are going for. Does it work?

    6. The classroom is physically organized to facilitate the distributionof activities and the use of multiple resources, especially books, aspart of the activities

      There is a materialism to distributed cognition. The artifacts matter, as a part of the fabric of the socially shared learning/thinking process.

    7. These funds of knowledge are sociallyinherited and culturally reproduced and developed (or discarded),and their distribution is a constant and dynamic characteristic ofhousehold life

      Are these mostly reproduced through social interaction, through the social network?

    8. Households depend on their social networks in order to cope withcomplex and changing circumstances

      And these networks help comprise their shared "funds of knowledge"

    9. These mundane exchanges takea variety of forms, such as labor services, access to information, in-cluding help in finding jobs or housing and knowledge about dealingwith government agencies, and various forms of material assistancebesides money such as sheltering visitors.

      Examples of Funds of knowledge. In the classrooms that I study, these could be shared norms of interaction, historical views of schooling and classrooms, etc.

    10. thinking as distributed dynamically in inter-personal relationships among people, their artifacts, and their envi-ronments

      Thinking as distributed. When I think about what that means for a classroom I immediately go to the understanding that learning happens through dialogue and interaction (between people, artifacts and the environment). This means a focus on those interactions is necessary to see/develop classroom thinking. How does that fit into a theory of communities of practice and LPP?

    11. Vygotsky, 1978, 1987

      Right away, this citation is important, fits this piece into a socal development theory lens.

    12. The primary purpose of this work is to change or improve classroomteaching by drawing on the knowledge and skills found in local house-holds

      Important distinction here. Purpose is change or improve classroom teaching based on researching local households. What does that mean, and how can those two be linked?

    13. along
    1. The resources were made available to athletes by virtue oftheir presence in the physical space and through one-on-one interactions with CoachJ. Additionally, ideational resources were often conveyed as students were explicitlypositioned into particular roles with respect to the events at which they wouldcompete in meet

      Coach J is the gate keeper, the mentor, who needs to provide the resources for a student to engage in building the identity of a track athlete. Therefore, he is the identity gate keeper. Why, therefore, examine this through the lens of resources instead of merely habitus or "cultural toolkit?"

    2. Specifically, it makesthe case for a treatment of learning and identity that considers them to be intimatelyrelated to one another but also to be distinct processes. Thinking about learning andidentities in schools in this way might support a clearer conceptual understanding ofthe relation between learning and identity that does not conflate them or view themas unrelated.

      This article, as I understand it, provides arguments that identity and learning are intimately related, but not that they are distinct processes. While I agree with this statement that I highlighted, I wonder in what ways we can look to studies like this one to provide the nuance Nasir and Cook are looking for and claiming. It seems that Holland et al.'s description fits more with an understanding that identity and learning are not distinct processes.

  2. newclasses.nyu.edu newclasses.nyu.edu
    1. He does not figure his life in AP!s terms. He views AA as a measure to take when things get really bad. He does not share the set of values and distinctions that unites other AA members. The identity of "alcoholic" does not affect his actions, or his perceptions of self, beyond his drinking behavior. Andrew has never stayed in AA for more than one year, although he has been in treatment for alcoholism four times and in and out of AA at least three times

      Andrew's identity did not contain Alcoholic in the AA terms yet. Therefore he was not engaged in the figured world of AA. Is this the only way one can be considered a part of a figured world in this analysis?

    2. Apparently the story was consciously developed from the beginning as a vehicle for presenting an experience or person with whom the prospect could identify

      How is this different from and/or the same as other socio-historical. cultural forces that drive the reproduction of this figured world of being an AA alchoholic? What about other figured worlds? Is this conscious social step, prescribed in literature that all must read and listen to in order to be part of AA figured world, truly indicative of the forces of reproduction behind other figured worlds?

    3. We conceive this step as devaluation, rather than diffusion, as Schwartz and Merten call it

      Interesting to move away from diffusion, which implies moving across a boarder, as a solution does across a membrane in diffusion, to devaluation which implies possible further connection;

    4. Telling AA personal stories also helps members identify with one an­other in ways that are harder to document. As a public event, one that is not only observable but material and co-participatory, the telling encom­passes body practices, including vocalization, that realize structures of affect and disposition. Not only social theorists, from Durkheim and Mauss to Bourdieu, but any participant in such performances would tell you that the fellow-feeling born in these ceremonies is a powerful means of identification.

      The personal story is a force in many directions for the figured world of AA, especially in creating and shaping identity of members.

    1. This context of flux is the ground for identity development. It sets the conditions for what we called in Chapter 2 the authoring self-what in Chapter 8 we will expand to call the "space of authoring."

      Within the theoretical frame of figured worlds, this looks to give space for individual/shared agency.

    2. Because of its roots in Marxian analyses of capitalism and other historically specific modes of produc-tion, activity theory pays more attention to the articulation of activities within larger syste_ms_<.>f power and prlvilsge

      This connection is important. Figured worlds can also be viewed as produced by structural systems of power and privilege. Could this a view of figured worlds be grounded in Critical Theory as well as Marxist theory?

    3. Each is a simplified world populated by a set of agents (in the world of romance: attractive women, boyfriends, lovers, fiances) who engage in a limited range of meaningful acts or changes of state (flirting with, falling in love with, dumping, having sex with) as moved by a specific set of forces (attractiveness, love, lust)

      "figured worlds" definition. This definition leads me to ask where the foundational "specific set of forces," come from. I would assume they are cultural forces (re)produced by cultural interactions throughout and within different figured worlds. This is indicated in the next sentence by the word "sociohistoric."

    4. Artifacts "open up" figured worlds. They are the means by coUec-nveiyuevelopea, individually learned, and made sociaUy power

      Thinking about this with a science study lens: Artifacts are both the material instruments scientists use to study the world (in figured world of being a climate scientist, for instance) and the produced narrative for more encompassing figured worlds of united states citizens (within it, both climate change deniers and people who understand the impact humans have had on the climate and support action)

    1. Inacoffeeshop,unlikeaclassroom,itdoesn’tseemlikeanyoneisworriedaboutminimizingtheanxietyfeltbycustomers/”students”

      What about the staff? What about other participants in this social setting/ this culture?

    2. Theteachersinthisinstancearethestaffbaristas,cashiers,managers..

      What makes them teachers?

    3. Ifacustomerisn’tanexperiencedcoffeedrinker,theymighthavetoaskthebaristaforhelp

      Did you witness anyone doing this?

    4. Ipersonallyfeelliketheydon’tgooutoftheirwaytobeoverlynicebutthat’ssortoftheirvibe

      What about their demeanor, etc tells you this? Paint me a picture.

    1. t  was  interesting  to  note  that  many  people  observed  others  instead  of  risking  looking  “dumb”by  asking  for  help  or  doing  things

      Great point. Verbalizing ignorance is a risk

    2.  students  were  confused  by  the  machine  and  some  techniques  they  used  were  asking  a  fellow  student  or  watching  to  see  what  others  would  do,  or  making  the  long  line  atthe  help  desk  instead.

      Nice! Strategies for learning how to navigate.

    3.  books.  I  include  myself,  as  I  tried  to  swipe  my  NYU  card  a  couple  of  times,  then  finally  giving  up  and  using  the  other  machine,  which  finally  acquiescedmy  desir

      What does this say about the learning process? What needed to be learned?

    4.  space.If  they  were  able  to  arrive  safely  without  making  a  beeline  for  a  mug  emblazoned  with  TISCH  or  STERN,  they  were  m

      Haha Love it! What do you mean by chaos? Describe it to me. Reading the next few sentences does not give me that feeling (yet!).

    5. you

      Nice! also use second person above!

    6. one

      Personally, I think its much more powerful if you write these descriptions in the first or second person.

      "As I cross the busy street..." Or "As you cross they busy street to arrive at teh bookstore, you..."

    1.  to  do  so.  However,  in  my  observations  people  often  used  their  friends  as  tools,  following  their  lead  and  even  getting  their  guidance,  as  was  the  case  with  the  young  woman  who  attempted  to  open  the  locked  doors.

      Nice connection with observation!

    2. each  person’s  success  depends  on  how  well  other  people  can  navigate  the  entrance

      GREAT connection!

    3.  This  entrance  was  definitely  not  designed  to  accommodate  people  with  disabilit

      Great observation!

    4. ither  the  person  would  speed  up  and  enter  the  door  quickly,  usually  with  a  little  skip  hop,  or  more  usually  they  would  play  it  safe,  wait,  and  enter  in  the  next  compartment  of  the  door.  This  timing  reminded  me  of  the  rhythm  and  timing  needed  to  play  dou

      Nice! good Connection!

    5.  a  giggle.  It  seemed  that  they  knew  they  were  going  against  the  intended  purpose  of  the

      What indicated this?

    6.  saw  two  instances  of  a  pair  of  young  women  get  into  one  compartment  together,  each  time  they  did  this  with

      What happened when they did? Did it slow down the cue? What was the reaction of other people around them?

    7.  For  the  majority  of  my  time  observing,  there  was  a  large  amount  of  people  using  the  left  door,  a  moderate  stream  of  people  at  the  center  door,  and  only  a  few  people  using  the  right

      Interesting. I would love to hear your analysis on why this was true.

    8. The  generalgoal  of  learning  to  use  the  revolving  doors  seemed  to  focus  on  entering  and  exiting  smoothly  without  disrupting  the  stream  of  people.

      Like this! How do you know this? Give brief outline of some observations

    1. mocro

      micro

    2. corrected by other members of the community,when Felipe moved the door the “wrong way”and someone immediately corrected it for theirown use, and through failure and possible humiliation, when the group of two tried to engage in the door activity together.I was witnessing the generative practice of being in a community; a community of revolving doorusers at Kimmel, which involved the construction of identities,even if just a small partof the identitiesof individuals that are part of it.This community had important social understandings and physical requirements that needed to be learned, through legitimate peripheral participation, not just through practice.

      Forced. You mean community of practice. LPP is a way of looking at how people learn, NOT a method of learning

    3. ep

      Keeps

    4. think

      TYPO!

    5. probably taught them to enter the door individually next time.

      evidence? How do you know this?

    6. r behumiliated as an indication that you are new here and don’t know how to use these doors.

      Clarify

    7. When people did use the revolving door, it moved faster as more people used it(to a specific point),

      Is this a confusing point? Does this make sense?

    8. Everyday Activities Field Notes9/15/15Colin Hennessy Elliott1|PageKimmel Revolving Door:Field Notes: Everyday ActivitiesI

      This is just annoying me, its a diff font...

    1. apprenticeship has been treated as a historically significant object more often than most educational phenom-ena

      Similar to the comment below, what is apprenticeship as an educational phenomena? Why is it different than what most of us understand apprenticeship as? I agree that it this term has taken on too many meanings in educational literature.

    1. Instead, they invent new methods specific to the situation at hand

      Works

    2. Efforts to play this enabling function are likely to result in new forms of schooling that are also our best hope of preparing the next generation to participate knowledgeably and effectively in the civic functions of a technologically complex democratic society.

      The goal of education must be centered around being an informed citizen as well. This will not just be a byproduct of a system formed to help people with future jobs. The prescribed goals of education in the united states have oscillated between the two for the past 150 years. The focus cannot be on just job preparation.

    3. The process of schooling seems to encourage the idea that the "game of school" is to learn symbolic rules of various kinds, that there is not supposed to be much continuity between what one knows outside school and what one learns in school.

      Interesting to continue to describe the abstraction of school curricula and pedagogy as "symbols" and "symbolic rules." Does this mean that symbolic and modeling relationships to "real world" are still too much abstraction to be taught in schools? Is Resnick merely calling for "authentic learning" to be focused on in school?

    4. In school, the greatest premium is placed upon "pure thought" activities-what individuals can do without the external support of books and notes, calculators, or other complex instruments

      In a lot of ways, I see this changing in Science Education. As it does, we still need to continue to investigate how the tools we use to learn, and to investigate the world scientifically, effect what we learn.

    5. In contrast, much activity outside school is socially shared. Work, personal life, and recreation take place within social systems, and each person's ability to function successfully depends on what others do and how several individuals' mental and physical performances mesh

      This point is hugely in contrast to the analysis of Becker. However, social life of school is important to learning, it just is not always assessed/assessed correctly.

    1. People learn, in spite of the obstacles our analysis suggests, because the schools and job situations in which they Jearn seldom approach the extreme conditions of these ideal analytic types.

      I wonder then, what type of hybridized learning Beker would suggest from this analysis. Knowing there are faults with both "ideal" types of learning, doesn't that mean we need to find ways to incorporate both when we attempt to structure learning environments?

    2. They assume that what they know, the student needs to know

      It is important to continue to question this assumption as educators and researchers. Why is this a driving assumption of school, shuttering the possibility of the learning process as a dialogue?