865 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2019
    1. The AS-NoSOD group (N = 27) presented normal speech onset, whereas the AS-SOD group (N = 28) was characterized by a SOD.

      groups

    2. AS individuals (N = 55)

      number of subjects

    1. SPSS

      stat tool

    2. Brain Connectivity Toolbox

      software tool

    3. Automated Anatomical Labeling Atlas (AAL)

      software tool

    4. The FA threshold of 0.15

      analysis parameter

    5. Each line was propagated by 0.25 mm to the next point in space, at which point the process was repeated. Each of these streamlines was terminated when FA < 0.15 or when the angular deviation from paths was >55° to prevent streamlines from looping back

      analysis parameters

    6. Deterministic tractography was performed using the Diffusion Toolkit in PANDA, a MATLAB

      software tool

    7. FSL's “dtifit” tool

      software tool

    8. “auto_warp” command in AFNI

      software tool

    9. “fsl_prepare_fieldmap” tool in FSL

      software tool

    10. skull-stripped using the Brain Extraction Tool

      software tool

    11. “eddy” tool from FSL

      software tool

    12. Diffusion tensor imaging data was acquired using a single-shot spin echo echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence with 30 gradient directions and the following acquisition parameters: repetition time (TR) = 7700 ms; echo time (TE) = 90 ms; b = 1000 s/mm2; acquisition matrix = 204 × 204; voxel size = 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0 mm, 60 contiguous axial slices and scan time = 8 min 22 s. High-resolution T1-weighted structural images were also acquired by collecting 176 contiguous sagittal slices using a three-dimensional magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo imaging (3D MPRAGE) sequence with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) = 2250 ms; inversion time (TI) = 850 ms; echo time (TE) = 3.98 ms; field of view (FOV) = 256 mm; acquisition matrix = 256 × 256; voxel size = 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm; slice thickness = 1.0 mm; flip angle = 9°. A field map was also recorded with a gradient echo sequence with the parameters of repetition time (TR) = 488 ms; echo time 1 (TE 1) = 4.92 ms; echo time 2 (TE 2) = 7.38 ms; voxel size = 3.0 × 3.0 × 3.0 mm; field of view (FOV) = 204 mm; slice thickness = 3.0 mm; 40 slices; flip angle = 60° to measure field inhomogeneities and compensate for geometrical distortions that result from standard EPI sequences.

      Acquisition details

    13. 3 T Siemens Trio MRI scanner using a 12-channel head coil

      Scanner

    1. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      Data availability statement

    2. GWCi = β0 + β1Gj + β2 agej + β3 agej2 + β4 agej3 + β5 (agej × groupj) + β6 (agej2 × groupj) + β7 (agej3 × groupj) + β8 IQj + εi, where ε denotes the residual error.

      stat model

    3. Corrections for multiple comparisons across the whole brain were performed using random-field theory (RFT)-based cluster-corrected analysis for non-isotropic images using a p < 0.05 (two-tailed) cluster-significance threshold

      stat detail: multiple compariuson

    4. F-test for nested model comparisons was performed at each vertex

      stat test

    5. linear, quadratic, and cubic effects of age, in addition to the main effect of group in a vertex-wise fashion

      stat detail

    6. SurfStat toolbox (http://www.math.mcgill.ca/keith/surfstat/) for Matlab (R2016a; www.mathworks.com)

      Statistical analysis

    7. smoothed using a 10-mm full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) surface-based Gaussian kernel prior to statistical analyses

      analysis detail

    8. final sample size of 153 participants (n = 77 individuals with ASD and n = 76 TD controls)

      final sample size

    9. FreeSurfer v5.3.0

      Analysis tool

    10. 3-Tesla GE Signa System (General-Electric, Milwaukee, WI) with full-head coverage, 196 contiguous slices (1.1-millimetre (mm) thickness, with 1.09 × 1.09 mm in-plane resolution), a 256 × 256 × 196 matrix, and a repetition time/echo time (TR/TE) of 7/2.8 milliseconds (ms) (flip angle = 20°, FOV = 28 cm). A (birdcage) head coil was used for radiofrequency transmission and reception.

      Acquisition details

    11. aged 7 to 25

      age range

    12. Eighty-two (82) right-handed males with ASD and eighty-two (82)

      N Subjects

  2. Dec 2018
    1. FORCE11 Scholarly Communications Institute; Aug 5-9, 2019; UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

  3. Nov 2018
  4. Oct 2018
    1. These data are obtained from the Human Connectome Project and thus we must adhere to their data use terms (https://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-young-adult/data-use-terms). They provide data access at the following link: https://db.humanconnectome.org/.

      Data source

    2. independent samples t-tests and analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs; controlling for age and ICV) to test for gender differences in FFM traits and amygdala/hippocampal volumes, respectively

      Stat method

    3. Hippocampal subfield segmentation was derived using the automated algorithm available in FreeSurfer version 6.0

      software tool

    4. a modified version of the FreeSurfer automated “recon-all” pipeline

      software tool

    5. Chris Rorden’s DICOM to NIFTI

      Software tool

    6. 8 participants did not complete the NEO-FFI

      subjects group modifier

    7. 1,113 participants

      Data subset

    8. Data were drawn from the publicly available repository of the WU-Minn HCP

      Data Source

    9. Human Connectome Project sample (N = 1105)

      Data Source

    10. FreeSurfer amygdala and hippocampus segmentation pipelines

      Method

    1. The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

      Sharing Statement: raw data

    2. covariates

      stat

    3. Inferential statistics on the clinical variables were performed with SPSS v24

      stat tool and version

    4. All the statistics were performed with SPM12 using a threshold p < 0.05 corrected for the False Discovery Rate (FDR) at voxel level.

      Statistical method

    5. The ARtifact Detection Tool (ART) was employed to create regressors and detect outliers

      Processing tool

    6. FWHM equal to 6 mm

      processing: smoothing

    7. final voxel size of 2 × 2 × 2 mm3

      processing: resample

    8. pre-processed using SPM12 (49) and ANTs

      Analysis tools

    9. FA, MD, AD, and RD with a GLM comparing HCs and FRDA patients while accounting for age and sex as covariates

      statistical details

    10. JHU DTI-based WM atlas

      Analysis tools

    11. Voxel-wise statistics were performed for each DTI derived map with a general linear model (GLM) using age and sex as covariates, with the same approach previously described for VBM

      Statistical approach

    12. DTI-TK

      Analysis tool

    13. Tortoise

      Processing tool

    14. Voxel-wise statistics were computed with a general linear model (GLM) using FSL (41), with age, sex, and intracranial volume (ICV) in native space as covariates.

      Statistics approach

    15. FSL anatomical pipeline

      Analysis tools

    16. pre-processed with the N4 tool of ANTs

      Analysis Tools

    17. Voxel-Based Morphometry (VBM) pipeline

      Analysis Method 'Concept'

  5. Sep 2018
  6. Aug 2018
    1. Instructors: J. Bates, S. Ghosh, J. Grethe, Y. Halchenko, M. Hanke, C. Haselgrove, S. Hodge, D. Jarecka, D. Keator, D. Kennedy, M. Martone, N. Nichols, S. A. Abraham, J.-B. Poline, N. Preuss, M. Travers, and others

      Reproducible NeuroImaging Training at SFN; November 2-3, 2018; La Jolla, CA USA

    1. IBM SPSS Statistics,

      stat tool

    2. FSL (version 5.0.7)

      Tool

    3. FSL and Freesurfer software

      tools

    4. (VBM) protocol, using the default pipeline as implemented in FSL

      'Default pipeline' for VBM in FSL is ambiguous, I think.

    1. INCF 2018 Workshop on Advanced Data Discovery for Neuroscience; August 11, 2018; Montreal, Quebec

  7. Jun 2018
    1. METHODS IN NEUROSCIENCE AT DARTMOUTH COMPUTATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL; 7/30 - 8/7/2018; Dartmouth, NH, USA

  8. May 2018
    1. Controls and patients aged 60 years or older and from both genders, were included prospectively during 2015–2016 (n = 44). AD patients

      GroupDescription: AD Patients; GroupN:44

    2. cognitively normal individuals paired by age (n = 16)

      GroupDescription: cognitively normal individuals; GroupN: 16

    1. 3T whole-body MRI systems (Magnetom TIM Trio; VB17 software version; Siemens Healthcare):

      MRI Scanner description

    2. MPM sequence

      Imgaging sequence

    3. We used a backtracking algorithm (55) to parcellate 66 regions defined by sulcogyral criteria in the Desikan–Killiany atlas (56) into 308 contiguous parcels of approximately equal area (500 mm2) across both hemispheres in standard space (SI Appendix, Fig. S2A).

      Parcellation Region procedure description

    4. FreeSurfer v5.3.0

      Software used

    5. sample of 297 healthy young people sampled from primary healthcare registers, stratified by age, and balanced for sex in the adolescent age range 14–24 y old, with ∼60 participants in each of five age-defined strata: 14–15 y old inclusive, 16–17 y old, 18–19 y old, 20–21 y old, and 22–24 y old

      Subjects description

    6. that adolescent consolidation of these connectome hubs was associated with a specific gene expression profile, enriched for neuronal and oligodendroglial function, and enriched for risk of schizophrenia, a neurodevelopmental disorder with its highest incidence in young adults

      Hypothesis 3

    7. (ii) that adolescent cortical shrinkage/myelination (also known as consolidation) was concentrated anatomically on association cortex and topologically on the most strongly connected regions (hubs) of the human brain anatomical network

      Hypothesis 2

    8. (i) that adolescent cortical shrinkage was coupled to intracortical myelination

      Hypothesis 1

  9. Apr 2018
    1. Brain Lesion (BrainLes) workshop; September 16, 2018; Granada, Spain

    1. The age, MMSE, HAMD,and HAMA were performed with independent samples T test, and sex was performed with Chi-Square test.

      Stat method

    2. Significant difference was set at a P value of <0.05

      stat threshold

    3. PASW Statistics 18.0

      stat tool

    4. ITK-SNAP (V3.6.0)

      Tool

    5. visually inspected to confirm anatomical accuracy

      Method

    6. the new segment tool embedded in SPM 12 software

      Tool

    7. rest software

      Tool

    1. WMH volume was examined as a percentage of166ICV

      Stat process

    2. adjusted for age159and

      Stat method

    3. 3dRegAna, AFNI

      Software tool

    4. sigma 2 mm

      analysis parameter

    5. Voxelwise GM density was calculated using the145standard FSL VBM package

      Software

    1. subject’s age, sex, and eTIV were considered in the matrix design in the SPM12

      stat detail

    2. extent threshold was set at 250 voxels

      Stat detail

    3. SPM12 using an uncorrected threshold of p < 0.001

      Stat detail

    4. Statistical Package for Social Sciences software ver. 16.0

      Stat software

    5. p-value of less than 0.05 was used for group comparisons, and the extent threshold was set at 50 voxels

      Stat Parameters

    6. SPM12

      Stat software

    7. adjusted for estimated total intracranial volume (eTIV) and age

      Stat: Age and ICV adjustment

    8. FreeSurfer

      Tool

    9. 5.3.0

      FreeSurfer version

    10. 8-mm full-width-half-maximum Gaussian smoothing kernel

      Parameter

    11. SPM12

      Tool

    12. MRICRON

      Software tool

    13. VBM technique implemented in the CAT toolbox
    14. NIfTI

      data format

  10. Mar 2018
    1. For investigating group differences, we run voxel-wise linear regression in the form:X~A + βgroupGroup + βageAge + βsexSex + βscan−chScan − ch + βintervalInterval + βICVICV + εwhere X is the Jacobian determinant value at a given position, A is the constant Jacobian determinant term, the βs are the covariate regression coefficients, and ε is an error term.

      Stat model

    2. ANTs Symmetric Normalization (SyN; (Avants et al., 2008))

      Software

    3. flirt (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk)

      Software

    4. Brainsuite (http://brainsuite.org)

      Software

    5. (http://www.itksnap.org)

      Software

    1. SPSS version 20.0

      Stat software

    2. Student’s t-test.

      Stat test

    3. FreeSurfer 5.1.0

      Software

    4. Inbrain®, a Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA)-cleared software and a registered trademark of MIDAS Information Technology Co., Ltd., which performs fully-automated image analysis of brain structures

      Software

    1. Brain regions showing a significant interaction between group and Eyes Test score in the association with gray matter volume

      Result

    2. 1.5 × 1.5 × 1.5 mm and smoothed using a 12-mm full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) isotropic Gaussian kernel

      analysis parameters

    3. SPM81 and the VBM8 toolbox2 implemented in MATLAB R2012b

      Analysis tools

    4. analyzed using a t-test between groups and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with group (TD and ASD) as an effect-of-interest factor and age, sex and full-scale IQ as effect-of-no-interest covariates. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

      stat method

    5. SPSS 16.0J

      Stat software

    1. we performed PLS (McIntosh et al., 1996) using PLSGUI7

      Software

    2. probabilistic cytoarchitectonic atlas included in the SPM Anatomy toolbox

      Software

    3. Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas (Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002) included in the MRIcron software

      Software

    4. significance in both of these parametric and nonparametric analyses are reported. We also explored the effects of ASD subtype (Asperger’s disorder vs. PDD-NOS) using these predefined thresholds. The clusters that showed significant group difference (TD > ASD) were used as an inclusive mask.

      Stat details

    5. Permutation Analysis of Linear Models software

      Stat software

    6. VBM using a general linear model analysis, with group as the effect-of-interest factor and sex and age as the effect-of-no-interest covariates. The association between group difference and the volume of the gray matter was tested using T-statistics and reported as a Z-score after the T-value was transformed into the standard normal distribution. Voxels were deemed to be statistically significant if they reached the extent threshold of p < 0.05, after false-discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons based on the topological FDR procedure (Chumbley and Friston, 2009), with a cluster-forming threshold (CFT) of p < 0.01 (uncorrected)

      Stat details

    7. with default settings

      parameters

    8. visual inspection of T1 images and confirmed no macroscopic lesions or artifacts in the images

      QA

    9. VBM8 toolbox

      Tool and version

    10. MATLAB R2012b

      Tool version

    1. MarsBaR toolbox

      Stat tool

    2. GingerAle

      tool

    3. Statistical Non-Parametric Mapping toolbox

      stat tool

    4. age as a covariate and the results were assessed on the basis of nonparametric cluster-wise inference, with a cluster-forming threshold of 0.005 and cluster-based correction for multiple comparisons such that pFWE < 0.05. In addition, we re-ported any results passing the cluster-forming threshold of p < 0.005

      stat details

    5. GingerAle

      software

    6. Anatomic Labelling (AAL) system in the WFU pickatlas (www.nitrc.org/projects/wfu_pickatlas/).

      software

    7. controlling for age

      stat detail

    8. MarsBaR toolbox (http://marsbar.sourceforge.net/)

      stat analysis

    9. Statistical Non-Parametric Mapping toolbox (http://warwick.ac.uk/snpm), with a cluster-forming threshold of 0.005 and a family-wise error (FWE) of 0.05

      stat method

    10. included age as a covariate

      stat detail

    11. Neurosynth software (neurosynth.org) to conduct a reverse inference meta-analysis of previously published studies with the predefined search term “theory mind.”

      analysis approach

    12. smoothed with an iso-tropic 8 mm full-width at half-maximum

      Analysis detail

    13. final voxel size of 1.5 × 1.5 ×1.5  mm3; segmentation into grey matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid; and modulation by the nonlinear com-ponent only for volume changes during spatial normalization to identify regional differences in grey matter volume cor-rected for individual brain size

      analysis detail

    14. MATLAB 2014

      Software

    15. SPM8

      Software

    16. VBM

      Software

    1. IBM SPSS Statistics® version 22.

      Stat software

    2. z-distribution Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 repeats was then applied to correct for multiple comparisons using a cluster-forming threshold set at p < .05.

      Stat method

    3. FreeSurfer version 6.0

      Software and version

    4. 3D MP-RAGE sequence (TR/TE:2300/3.03 ms; flip angle: 90; 192 sagittal slices with 1 mm3 voxel size

      Imaging details

    5. 3 T Siemens Skyra scanner with a 20-channel head coil

      Acq Details

  11. Feb 2018
    1. Workshop Details August 20 – September 4, 2016 Friday Harbor Laboratories

      Summer Workshop on the Dynamic Brain; August 18 – September 2, 2018; Friday Harbor, WA

  12. repscience2016.research-infrastructures.eu repscience2016.research-infrastructures.eu
    1. First International Workshop on Reproducible Open Science; Sept 9, 2016; Hannover, Germany

    1. empowering users to make local changes.

      Local changes are great for customizability, but, it can play some havoc with reliability and reproducibility. 'ReproNim' recommends making such custom changes under the control of a version management system (ie. GitHub) so that the user can document an exact version of analysis used.

  13. Jan 2018