129 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2015
  2. Nov 2015
    1. They no longer shared the bonds of their trade but were subsumed under a new class-based relationships: employers and employees, bosses and workers, capitalists and laborers.

      People were not viewed with high regard unless their status was high.

    2. Many Americans distrusted these new, impersonal business organizations whose officers lacked personal responsibility while nevertheless carrying legal rights.

      but yet these businesses still developed and today big businesses are untrustworthy

    1. Moral suasionists, led most prominently by William Lloyd Garrison, felt that the United States Constitution was a fundamentally pro-slavery document, and that the present political system was irredeemable.

      The nation was set up to maintain slavery

    2. This effort was ultimately unsuccessful, but was significant for its introduction of the kinds of arguments that would pave the way for women’s political activism for abolitionism and women’s rights.

      Unsuccessful but a starting point for women's activism.

    3. As alcoholism became an increasingly visible issue in towns and cities, most reformers escalated their efforts from advocating moderation in liquor consumption to full abstinence from all alcohol.

      This was probably a good idea at the time

    1. And the Negroes found fault, and murmured against me, saying that if they had my sense they would not serve any master in the world.

      They told Nat that he should not believe what his master says, that he has a greater purpose.

    1. Fearing the use of loud instruments to communicate rebellions, Europeans created laws in the Americas to prohibit large numbers of enslaved people from gathering on their own time for funerals or other events.

      Europeans constantly feared rebellion

    2. folklore of Africans and their descendants in the Americas was crucially fashioned not simply by an African past, but by the complex ways African cultures interacted with European and American peoples and cultures in the New World.

      their folklore was based on their lifestyle and encounters

    1. Perhaps the most important aspect of Southern slavery during this so-called “Cotton Revolution” was the value placed upon both the work and the body of the slaves themselves.

      The slaves were an in-demand object but the lives of the Africans were not valued at all.

    2. Although slavery arrived in the Americas long before cotton became a profitable commodity, the use and purchase of slaves, the moralistic and economic justifications for the continuation of slavery, even the urgency to protect the practice from extinction before the Civil War all received new life from the rise of cotton and the economic, social, and culture growth spurt that accompanied its success.

      Americans were looking for an excuse to keep slavery alive and the rise of cotton gave them their reason.

    3. Some even sent their own agents to purchase cheap land at auction for the express purpose of selling it, sometimes the very next day, at double and triple the original value—a process known as “speculation.”

      This still happens today, with sporting tickets, the iwatch, shoes...

    4. Throughout the 1820s and 1830s, the federal government implemented several forced migrations of Native Americans, establishing a system of reservations west of the Mississippi River upon which all eastern peoples were required to relocate and settle.

      How can you just tell someone to leave their home?

    5. Perhaps most importantly, though, it came up at a time when land in the Southwest—southern Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and northern Louisiana—became readily available for anyone with a few dollars and big dreams.

      Similar to the tech industry today

    1. How many thousands of our own people would gladly embrace the opportunity of removing to the West on such conditions!

      They do not have the same values or lifestyle as the whites. Jackson referred to them as savages so he should not compare them to whites.

    2. It puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the General and State Governments on account of the Indians.

      Yes, there will be no war if the Indians give up their land peacefully.

    3. Two important tribes have accepted the provision made for their removal at the last session of Congress,

      What would have happened if they had not accepted the provision? They may have been forcefully removed.

  3. Oct 2015
    1. Article VII and the resolutions adopted by the Federal Convention required that the proposed Constitution be adopted not by the state legislatures but by specially-elected ratifying conventions that would represent the people of each state.

      Were the specially-elected ratifying conventions created just for this or did they exist already?

    1. The pro-ratification “Federalists,” on the other hand, argued that including a bill of rights was not only redundant but dangerous; it could limit future citizens from adding new rights.

      I don't really see the reason that the Federalists point out here

    1. Hence, many authors asked: once the colonists assented to a tax in any form, what would stop the British from imposing ever more and greater taxes on the colonists?

      Only resistance or if necessary, a revolution could stop it.

    2. These acts increased the presence of the British government in the colonies and circumscribed the authority of the colonial assemblies, since paying the governor’s salary had long given the assemblies significant power over them.
    3. But to save face and to try to avoid this kind of problem in the future, Parliament also passed the Declaratory Act, asserting that Parliament had the “full power and authority to make laws . . . to bind the colonies and people of America . . . in all cases whatsoever.”

      Learned from their mistake and decide to make a law giving them power to make laws however they want. Very oppressive.

    4. These political, intellectual, cultural, and economic developments built tensions that rose to the surface when, after the Seven Years’ War, Britain finally began to implement a program of imperial reform that conflicted with colonists’ understanding of the empire and their place in it.

      Not on the same page

    5. The revolution created politicians eager to foster republican selflessness and protect the public good but also encouraged individual self-interest and personal gain.

      This must be what was paradoxical about it.

    1. Parliament started legislating over all the colonies in a way rarely done before. As a result, the colonies began seeing themselves as a collective group, rather than just distinct entities.

      The beginning of a nation

    2. During the war, the British Crown issued the Royal Proclamation Line of 1763, which marked the Appalachian Mountains as the boundary between Indian country and the British colonies.

      The British colonists provoked the Natives when they crossed this line.

    3. However, the British General Jeffrey Amherst discouraged this practice and regulated the trade or sale of firearms and ammunition to Indians.

      This shows that they do not want any kind of association and at this time it means preparation for war

    4. In 1754 a force of British colonists and Native American allies, led by young George Washington, attacked and killed a French diplomat. This incident led to a war

      Why was this done, was it a mistake of not knowing what it would lead to?

    5. While in practice elites controlled colonial politics, in theory many colonists believed in the notion of equality before the law and opposed special treatment for any members of colonial society.

      Does this mean colonists as the common person? Or does it mean elites opposed special treatment?

    6. The assembly was composed of elected, property-owning men whose official goal was to ensure that colonial law conformed to English law.

      They wanted to keep things under control bu electing property-owning men.

  4. classicliberal.tripod.com classicliberal.tripod.com
    1. were it not for the corruption and viciousness of degenerate men, there would be no need of any other, no necessity that men should separate from this great and natural community

      greed, cruelty and corruption causes separation.

    2. make them take sanctuary under the established laws of government, and therein seek the preservation of their property.

      They want to protect their property for fear of someone trying to take it from them.

  5. Sep 2015
    1. working from dawn to dusk in groups with close supervision by a white overseer or enslaved “driver” who could use physical force to compel labor.

      Ultimate suffering. I could understand a slave not wanting to go on in life anymore with these circumstances, with the only hope of being free one day.

    2. South Carolina also banned the freeing of slaves unless the freed slave left the colony.

      One of the most oppressive rules that I've read so far. Even if a white slave owner wanted to free his slaves that he purchased, he couldn't.

    1. The presence of Africans who bore arms and served in the Spanish militia testifies to the different conceptions of race among the English and Spanish in America

      This is a good statement regarding the way Africans were perceived differently by the English and Spanish

    2. “I can’t think there is any intrinsic value in one color more than another, nor that white is better than black, only we think it so because we are so.”

      You never heard Africans say that they are better than whites they just want their own freedom.

    3. Building contracts for the forts went to Berkeley’s wealthy friends, who conveniently decided that their own plantations were the most strategically vital.

      This still happens in politics today where politicians give contracts to their wealthy friends.

    4. The war’s brutality also encouraged a growing hatred of all Indians among many New England colonists.

      They hated the Indians for defending themselves. What the don't realize or even care about was that the Indians were there first.

    1. the Puritan had made a covenant with God to establish a truly Christian community, in which the wealthy were to show charity and avoid exploiting their neighbors while the poor were to work diligently

      Did the Puritans decide this themselves? Did they know for a fact that the poor were supposed to work diligently or was this just something that they decided?

    1. so that we, who hitherto have had possession of no more ground than their waste and our purchase at a valuable consideration to their contentment gained, may now by right of war, and law of nations, invade the country, and destroy them who sought to destroy us

      Nothing was gained by the attack. Only lives were lost, on both sides

    1. above.
      1. According to King Afonso, what have been the detrimental effects of the Portuguese presence in his kingdom? Portuguese products and customs had caused dissension and instability throughout the kingdom, since most products are prohibited. King Afonso's vassals were caught up in the abundance of products that the Portuguese brought and and became less obedient to African customs. Also, the Portuguese pursuit of slaves undermined Afonso's authority which made his subjects uncontrollable.

      2. What steps has he taken to deal with the problems caused by the Portuguese? He wrote a letter to the King of Portugal and asked him to stop sending the merchants that had been coming to his kingdom.

      3. Why is he appealing directly to the Portuguese king for aid? He is appealing to the Portuguese king directly because he is the one who can send the aid that is needed right away, rather than try to go through middle men to reach the king.

      4. Does King Afonso see the Portuguese presence in his kingdom as a right or a privilege? I think he sees it as a privilege, but feels powerless toward the king of Portugal, which is why he is pleading with him in the letter. If he were more powerful than the Portuguese he would demand they leave or negotiate for the aid that they need.

      5. How does King Afonso distinguish legitimate and illegitimate trade in slaves? To King Alonso, illegitimate slave trade is when the white men enter his kingdom and take slaves and immediately brand them. If they are caught they would then say that they purchased the slaves and would not be able to be proven wrong. To try to avoid this, they passed a law so that any white man that wants to purchase goods has to go to one of three officials and be cleared for a purchase.

      6. What elements of Portuguese culture does he welcome? Why? He asks for some priests, people to reach in schools, wine and flour for the holy sacrament . There was a lot of disease that was brought in and he wants two physicians and two apothecaries and one surgeon to help and try to cure the diseases.

  6. Aug 2015
    1. Culturally and geographically isolated, some combination of limited resources, inhospitable weather, food shortages, and native resistance drove the Norse back into the sea.

      They settled in the wrong place, otherwise they may be well known like Columbus is.

    1. She had not been consulted by Obatala, and grew angry that he had usurped so much of her kingdom.

      Olokun's ego gets in the way of admiring what Obatala had built, but it was her kingdom that he was building on. Who was right and who was wrong?