13 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Three ways people respond to a problem (other than solving it)

      Three Ways People Respond to a Problem (Other Than Solving It)

      • Pushing Problems Around:
        • Many organizational efforts simply shift friction from one area or team to another, resulting in local optimization rather than actual system improvement.
        • Rather than blaming individuals who are acting logically under their immediate incentives, root cause fixes require intervention from higher-level leadership to realign systemic incentives.
      • Preserving Problems:
        • Highlights the Shirky Principle: institutions and specialized roles often work to inadvertently perpetuate the very problems they exist to solve.
        • Solving a problem effectively requires identifying stakeholders who benefit from its existence and incorporating their interests into the resolution strategy.
      • Promoting New Problems:
        • Solving a primary issue inevitably elevates secondary problems or introduces unintended collateral issues (referencing Weinberg's rule and Postman's technological questions).
        • Consultants and problem-solvers must abandon the illusion that problems can ever be permanently eliminated, learning when to address issues and when to deliberately ignore them.

      Hacker News Discussion

      • Ignoring Problems as a Strategy:
        • Commenters advocate for "benign neglect," noting that a vast majority of minor organizational issues disappear on their own when stakeholders fail to reach consensus on their importance.
        • Waiting to see which problems survive delay acts as a practical filter for identifying issues truly worth solving.
      • Expanding Scope and Problem Creep:
        • Discussions point out that addressing initial symptoms often expands the definition of the problem until allocated resources are entirely exhausted, making boundary-setting essential.
      • In-House vs. Commodity Solutions:
        • Participants discuss how engineering teams often reject existing solutions over minor missing features, inadvertently creating massive maintenance overhead that pushes problems into the future.
      • Political & Cognitive Approaches:
        • Users share reflections on how different mindsets approach problem-solving: some focus heavily on reacting to immediate symptoms without testing underlying assumptions, while others jump straight to solutions without accounting for secondary systemic costs.
  2. Jan 2026
    1. My favorite kind of problem is a solvable problem. I know a lot of people who just brute force or deal with their issues, but I try to notice pain points and deal with them. This isn’t just an AI thing, this is a life thing.

      Interesting point, and fair enough. Start from the friction points. Like w open data [[Open data begint buiten 20200808162905]]

  3. Aug 2021
    1. To get better at show and tell, start by being clear about the action that should flow from your problem solving and findings: the governing idea for change. Then find a way to present your logic visually so that the path to answers can be debated and embraced. Present the argument emotionally as well as logically, and show why the preferred action offers an attractive balance between risks and rewards. But don’t stop there. Spell out the risks of inaction, which often have a higher cost than imperfect actions have.

      Problem çözümü ve akış şemasını açık bir şekilde belirt.

      Anlaşılabilecek ve üstünde tartışılabilecek bir görsel şeklinde sun.

      Argümanı mantıki ve duygusal olarak sun

      Aksiyomun riskler ve ödüller arasında neden seçilebilir bir denge unsuru olduğunu ifade edin.

      Aksiyom almamanın sonuçlarını belirtin.

    2. The secret to developing a dragonfly-eye view is to “anchor outside” rather than inside when faced with problems of uncertainty and opportunity. Take the broader ecosystem as a starting point. That will encourage you to talk with customers, suppliers, or, better yet, players in a different but related industry or space. Going through the customer journey with design-thinking in mind is another powerful way to get a 360-degree view of a problem. But take note: when decision makers face highly constrained time frames or resources, they may have to narrow the aperture and deliver a tight, conventional answer.
    3. The secret to developing a dragonfly-eye view is to “anchor outside” rather than inside when faced with problems of uncertainty and opportunity. Take the broader ecosystem as a starting point. That will encourage you to talk with customers, suppliers, or, better yet, players in a different but related industry or space. Going through the customer journey with design-thinking in mind is another powerful way to get a 360-degree view of a problem. But take note: when decision makers face highly constrained time frames or resources, they may have to narrow the aperture and deliver a tight, conventional answer.

      Sorunla karşılaşıldığında dışarıya demirlemek dışarıdan bakmaya çalışmak sorunla ilgili sorunların ve alanları kontrol etmek daha geniş bir perspektif sağlayabilir.

    4. One simple suggestion from author and economist Caroline Webb to generate more curiosity in team problem solving is to put a question mark behind your initial hypotheses or first-cut answers. This small artifice is surprisingly powerful: it tends to encourage multiple solution paths and puts the focus, correctly, on assembling evidence. We also like thesis/antithesis, or red team/blue team, sessions, in which you divide a group into opposing teams that argue against the early answers—typically, more traditional conclusions that are more likely to come from a conventional pattern. Why is this solution better? Why not that one? We’ve found that better results come from embracing uncertainty. Curiosity is the engine of creativity.

      Erken cevapların düşünce sürecini durdurmasını engellemek için ilerlemelerimizin sonuna bir soru işareti koyarak devam etmeye çalışabiliriz. Bu durum farklı çözüm ve varsayımlara ulaşmamıza yardımcı olabilir.

    5. Relentlessly ask, “Why is this so?” Unfortunately, somewhere between preschool and the boardroom, we tend to stop asking. Our brains make sense of massive numbers of data points by imposing patterns that have worked for us and other humans in the past. That’s why a simple technique, worth employing at the beginning of problem solving, is simply to pause and ask why conditions or assumptions are so until you arrive at the root of the problem.

      Neden böyle sorusunun sorulmaya devam edilmesi.

      Düşünmemizin önüne geçen önkabulleri ve inançların düşünme sürecimizi durdurmasına izin vermemiz gerekmektedir.

      Neden sorusunu , olguların ve durumların varsayımlarını sorgulamaya sorunun temeline inene kadar devam ettirmeliyiz.

  4. Feb 2019
    1. offering humanity a way to address complex problems together

      Even as a way is offered to address these problems together, there is often conflict and denial. Witness the political realm in relation to global climate change, distribution of resources, conflict between nations, etc. Computer models are created, are worked on by specialists, but implementation of real change to benefit humanity relies on political decisions and even (perhaps especially) the mentioned profit motive.