11 Matching Annotations
- Jan 2023
-
-
Agree, but we're stuck with API compatibility for a good while.
-
- Mar 2022
-
code.visualstudio.com code.visualstudio.com
-
Note that this is a breaking API change in the libraries (more information in the README.md). It does not affect the backwards compatibility of the protocol itself.
annotation meta: may need new tag: backwards compatibility of the protocol backwards compatibility for [libraries that use [it?]]
-
- Aug 2021
-
www.ruby-lang.org www.ruby-lang.org
-
Will my code break on Ruby 2.7? A short answer is “maybe not”. The changes in Ruby 2.7 are designed as a migration path towards 3.0. While in principle, Ruby 2.7 only warns against behaviors that will change in Ruby 3, it includes some incompatible changes we consider to be minor. See the “Other minor changes” section for details. Except for the warnings and minor changes, Ruby 2.7 attempts to keep the compatibility with Ruby 2.6. So, your code will probably work on Ruby 2.7, though it may emit warnings. And by running it on Ruby 2.7, you can check if your code is ready for Ruby 3.0.
-
- Feb 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
I'm not very familiar with this feature. Do you know what version of Rails is required for this code to work? Is it Rails 6.0+? We run the test suite via Travis CI for many versions of Rails so I am concerned that this will cause test failures on older versions. Can we write the tests so that they gracefully exclude the CSP stuff on older versions where CSP is not supported?
-
-
-
{a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4} => {a:, b:, **rest} # a == 1, b == 2, rest == {:c=>3, :d=>4}
equivalent in javascript:
{a, b, ...rest} = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4}
Not a bad replacement for that! I still find javascript's syntax a little more easily readable and natural, but given that we can't use the same syntax (probably because it would be incompatible with existing syntax rules that we can't break for compatibility reasons, unfortunately), this is a pretty good compromise/solution that they've come up with.
-
- Oct 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
The problem with using a newer distro is that it upgrades glibc, which is bad for compatibility with older distros.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
The backwards compatible implementation of jsx(...), we would still support key passed as props. We'd just pull it off props and issue a warning that this pattern is deprecated. The upgrade path is to just pass it to JSX separately if you need it.
-
-
recoiljs.org recoiljs.org
-
It's easy to persist the entire application state in a way that is backwards-compatible, so persisted states can survive application changes.
-
- Jul 2020
-
unix.stackexchange.com unix.stackexchange.com
-
It does, however, provide the --porcelain option, which causes the output of git status --porcelain to be formatted in an easy-to-parse format for scripts, and will remain stable across Git versions and regardless of user configuration.
-
- May 2020
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
Downgrade the API version used at run time by exporting the DOCKER_API_VERSION=1.21 to environment variable on the client side.
-
- Apr 2020
-
haveibeenpwned.com haveibeenpwned.com
-
In the future, these attributes may expand without the API being versioned. The current attributes are:
-