- Jan 2024
-
www.vulture.com www.vulture.com
-
- Jan 2023
-
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
-
Therefore, we propose that flow and hyperfocus are the same phenomenon. Although we are mindful that just because two phenomena are descriptively similar, they are not necessarily mechanistically identical, there is no evidence to suggest that either flow or hyperfocus are distinct.
Ashinoff and Abu-Akel propose an equivalence between "flow" and "hyperfocus". They mention later in this paper that "flow" is more often used in positive psychology literature whereas "hyperfocus" is more often used in psychiatric literature. Even so, they also qualify that they may just appear to be the same (ie, descriptively similar) while having a different cause (ie, mechanism of action).
-
- Mar 2022
-
movement-ontology.brandazzle.net movement-ontology.brandazzle.net
-
Put Eidsheim 2015 and O'Callaghan 2007 in dialogue with each other.
Brandon Lewis seems to be talking about actively taking two papers and placing them "in dialogue with each other" potentially by reading, annotating, and writing about them with himself as an intermediary.
-
- Nov 2017
-
halfanhour.blogspot.com halfanhour.blogspot.com
-
professors
Here’s one:
-
Docker eventually sold out to (I believe) Bell and the professors did just fine.
How times have changed.
-
- Nov 2015
-
secure-media.collegeboard.org secure-media.collegeboard.org
-
One analysis, by Rich Pirog of the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, showed that transportation accounts for only 11% of food’s carbon footprint.
This proves the idea that because the product is closer it is less harmful to the environment when the the transportation take just 11% of the total energy expended so regardless of distance it's affect on the food's carbon footprint is really small
-
The one big problem with thinking beyond food miles is that it’s hard to get the information you need.
i agree because sometimes you cant get the information you need from farms to see if their animals and products are being grown environmentally friendly
-
Take lamb. A 2006 academic study (funded by the New Zealand government) discovered that it made more environmental sense for a Londoner to buy lamb shipped from New Zealand than to buy lamb raised in the U.K. This finding is counterintuitive — if you’re only counting food miles. But New Zealand lamb is raised on pastures with a small carbon footprint, whereas most English lamb is produced under intensive factory-like conditions with a big carbon footprint. This disparity overwhelms domestic lamb’s advantage in transportation energy.
I agree that the argument that the locacvore movement is not "greener" and that the time and effort used to raise an animal ex. lamb is more counterproductive than just buying from the normal provider
-