Toward the end of his life, futurist Fred Polak looked not toward thefuture but back at the past, at what previous generations thought the futurewould be like.
for - futurist - Fred Polak - looked to the past to see how they saw the future.
Toward the end of his life, futurist Fred Polak looked not toward thefuture but back at the past, at what previous generations thought the futurewould be like.
for - futurist - Fred Polak - looked to the past to see how they saw the future.
One dystopian potential outcome would be that, despite the best efforts of many institutions of all kinds, we could see a devolution back to a distinctly two-tiered system like what existed in 19th Century Britain. In this negative projection one can envision a very small number of well-endowed institutions that cater to the wealthy, well-prepared class as well as a small number of carefully picked representatives from various groups. These students would receive a world-class education, while most students would be at risk of receiving a much lower quality education that is overly-reliant on poorly built computerized teaching systems or online learning courseware that does not provide the kind of encouragement and motivation that is required to help students through the many challenges encountered when learning. Following this path could well lead to a self-perpetuating system across generations where a small elite group benefits from a compounding level of social capital, while most students are left out, leading to a widening of social, political, cultural, and financial gulfs.
This is the dystopian vision that I fear a market-fundamentalist, machine-first approach will generate.
Pet peeve: Points taken away for Kevin's use of "devolution back" here, given that evolution does not go backwards.