3 Matching Annotations
- Feb 2022
-
www.vox.com www.vox.com
-
It’s the fear that having a kid in this day and age dooms that kid to a miserable life on a miserably hot planet.
That may be what some people believe, but there are other reasons too. Resource depletion, food shortages, and underemployment are big ones. Having fewer children isn't just about the climate; it's about creating a generally healthier society in the long term.
-
- May 2021
-
www.ted.com www.ted.com
-
n India, this has been fantastic, it has actually reduced the birth rate but kept it above that magic 2.1 number.
Won't that birth rate continue to fall, as has been the pattern in other countries?
-
- Feb 2019
-
outline.com outline.com
-
So, the UN forecasting model inputs three things: fertility rates, migration rates, and death rates. It doesn’t take into account the expansion of education for females or the speed of urbanization (which are in some ways linked). The UN says they’re already baked into the numbers. But when I went and interviewed [the demographer] Wolfgang Lutz in Vienna, which was one of the first things we did, he walked me through his projections, and I walked out of the room gobsmacked. All he was doing was adding one new variable to the forecast: the level of improvement in female education. And he comes up with a much lower number for global population in 2100, somewhere between 8 billion and 9 billion.
Makes sense
Tags
Annotators
URL
-