6 Matching Annotations
- Aug 2023
-
www.digitalocean.com www.digitalocean.com
-
Since DigitalOcean will ignore it, you can set it to whatever value you’d like. The value unused in the example code makes it clear that you’re not using it.
-
- Nov 2022
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
I've edited the title slightly to make the intent of the question more obvious.
-
- Mar 2021
-
www.jackfranklin.co.uk www.jackfranklin.co.uk
-
I like this approach more because I can scan the code that renders the Box component and easily spot that it takes two children. If the Box took any props, they'd be within the opening <Box> tag, and they would be distinct from any children props.
-
- Feb 2021
-
www.schneems.com www.schneems.com
-
The link name is not very helpful, it doesn’t explain what it does very well.
-
- Nov 2020
-
blog.hubspot.com blog.hubspot.com
-
One last bonus: CSS variables can be written in a way that makes it easier for human programmers to understand. If you just see hex code #93e9be, you won’t know what color it produces, while --brand-green makes clear the purpose of the variable.
-
- Sep 2018
-
www.mnemotext.com www.mnemotext.com
-
The establishing of this mutual relationship between technology and physics is correct. But it remains a merely historiological establishing of facts and says nothing about that in which this mutual relationship is grounded. The decisive question still remains: Of what essence is modern technology that it thinks of putting exact science to use?
It seems that the author is establishing a relationship between modern physics and technology as a circular relationship in that modern physics would not be possible if technology did not allow us to study it nor would technology advance should modern physics not be studied. So, essentially, modern technology is a method to reveal modern physics to us? Therefore, modern technology is also a revealing just as modern physics is a revealing, but that they mutually allow each other to do so?
-