- Dec 2023
-
inst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net inst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.netBailey.pdf39
-
Fortunately, American military leadership proved to be of the highest order.
This account has a lot of "great men" who were military leaders. I wish there was more on ordinary Americans, like the grunts or the factory workers.
-
We proved ourselves to be resourceful, tough, adaptable—able toaccomodate ourselves to the tactics of an enemy who was ruthless, relentless, and at timesbarbarous.
This seems to summarize Bailey's view of the US and Japan.
-
The fanatically resisting Japanese, though facing atomization, did not surrender.
Bailey is arguing that the atomic bombing of Nagasaki was necessary to make the Japanese surrender. Do most historians agree with this argument?
-
The huge atomic project was pushed feverishly forward, as American know-how and industrialpower were combined with the most advanced scientific knowledge.
How was Oppenheimer viewed in 1961 as compared with today, after the success of the Christopher Nolan film Oppenheimer? How do historians view the film and do they think it is accurate? Is there a monument to Oppenheimer?
-
Tokyo, recognizing imminent defeat, had already secretly sent peacefeelers to Russia, which had not yet entered the Far Eastern war.
What effect did this peace feelers to Russia have?
-
an invasion that presumably would cost hundreds of thousands ofAmerican casualties.
How did high command calculate these expected casualties?
-
Launched from Guam and other capturedMarianas, they were reducing the enemy's fragile cities to cinders.
Bailey provides evidence on Tokyo but doesn't mention other cities that were destroyed.
-
All told, our underseas craft destroyed 1042 ships, or abont 5o% ofNippon's entire life-giving merchant fleet
Good evidence of the impact US subs had on the Japanese merchant marine.
-
The United States navy, with marines and army divisions doing the meat-grinder fighting, hadmeanwhile been leapfrogging the Japanese islands in the Pacific
How do the different branches of the military view their roles in winning the war? Bailey mentions a lot of admirals but few generals, other than MacArthur.
-
Adecisive naval battle was fought near Midway, June 5-6, 1947.
What role did codebreaking play?
-
After the battered remnants of his armyhad hoisted the white flag, they were treated with vicious cruelty in the in famous Bataan deathmarch.
Are there monuments in Bataan about the death march? What do they say about MacArthur and his "return"? If there aren't, we could create a monument.
-
But Rosie'sunshepherded children were inclined to run wild, and an alarming wave of juveniledelinquency—or rather parental delinuency—accompanied and followed the war.
So juvenile delinquency was caused by women working? Couldn't the government have funded good day care programs or have recognized the roles of fathers in raising kids?
-
Noteworthy among thetroublemaking groups were the United Mine Workers,
Bailey clearly sees strikes as "troublemaking." He praises government leaders throughout. Including more of a "bottom up" perspective would help balance his presentation of US views of the war.
-
Butthese contributions came in the form of desperately needed trucks, automobiles, militaryaircraft, and other equipment, without which the Russians probably could not have smashedtheir way to Berlin
I wonder if the Soviet Union felt the US should have provided more troops to the Eastern front than the Western front.
-
Yet the Good Neighborpolicy of the 1930's reaped a rich harvest during these anxious years. Pan-Americanism becamemore a fact than a phrase, as Washington spent billions of dollars in Latin America for tin,nitrates, and other urgently needed materials.
I wonder if this might be too simple of a generalization for Latin American history during this period. I wonder if more recent scholarship addresses this.
-
Clearheaded Americans had come to the conclusion that no nation was safe unless all were safe.Appeasement—the process of throwing the weaker persons out of the sleigh to the pursuingwolves—had been tried, hut it had merely whetted dictatorial appetites
This makes it seem like US intentions were purely selfless. If this was the case, couldn't the US have done more to prevent the Nazis from committing genocide or to prevent Japanese atrocities against the Chinese?
-
Thomas A. Bailey
Who is this? What is Bailey's background?
-
The outcome was another vindication of the American democratic system—asystem founded on faith in the power and courage of free men.
Why does Bailey want to celebrate American democracy so much?
-
The Washington authorities, fearing that these peoplemight act as saboteurs for the Mikado in case of invasion, decided to herd them together inconcentration camps, though about two-thirds of the victims were American-born citizens. Thisbrutal precaution turned out to be unnecessary
Interesting that Bailey calls the camps "concentration camps" yet he doesn't address the racism that led to the creation of these camps. Was Japanese American loyalty and combat service necessary to prove this was unnecessary?
-
, Washington wisely adopted the grand strategy of"getting Hitler first."
Was this the best strategy? What about all the Chinese that were killed?
-
The Japanese fanatics forgot that when one stabs a king, one must stab to kill. A wounded butstill potent American giant pulled himself out of the mud of Pearl Harbor, grimly determined toavenge the bloody treachery.
"Japanese fanatics" and "American giant" shows Bailey's way of contrasting the 2 countries.
-
No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in theirrighteous might will win through to absolute victory
Shows FDR's ability to appeal to Americans to get them to support the war effort.
-
To keep Britainfrom collapsing, the Roosevelt administration felt compelled to extend the unneutral aid thatinvited attacks from German submarines. To keep Japan from expanding, the Washingtonofficials deemed it necessary to cut off vital Japanese supplies and invite possible retaliation.Rather than let democracy die and dictatorship rule supreme, a strong majority of the Americanpeople were evidently determined to support a policy that might lead to war. It did.
This is a good summary of Bailey's argument.
-
The Japanese imperialists,after waging a bitter war against the Chinese for more than four years, were unwilling to loseface by withdrawing at the behest of the United States.
Calling the Japanese "imperialists" shows that Bailey does not like their actions.
-
fearsome conquests by Japan in the Far East
Couldn't one also criticize US colonialism in Hawaii and the Philippines?
-
treacherous attack
Like the "sneak attack" description, calling Pearl Harbor a "treacherous attack" shows how much Bailey dislikes Japan at this time.
-
sneak attack
If the US knew war was likely why call Pearl Harbor a "sneak attack"?
-
while Tokyo was deliberately prolongingnegotiations in Washington. Japanese bombers, winging in from distant aircraft carriers,attacked without warning
Bailey is arguing that while US leaders might have expected war to begin, Japanese leaders still deceived US officials and "attacked without warning."
-
No one in high authority in Washingtonseems to have believed that the Japanese were either strong enough or foolhardy enough tolash out at Hawaii
So, Bailey is arguing that the US expected an attack but not in Hawaii.
-
The Japanese leaders were faced with two painful alternatives.They could either knuckle under to the Americans, or break out of the embargo ring by adesperate attack on the oil supplies and other riches of Southeast Asia
Sounds like Bailey is arguing that Japanese actions were understandable.
-
Nipponese warlords
Why use the term "Nipponese" and not "Japanese"?
-
Her war machine was fatally dependent on immense shipments from the UnitedStates of steel, scrap iron, oil, and aviation gasoline.
Good evidence for Bailey's argument.
-
"China incident,"
What is this?
-
She
Why does Bailey call Japan "she"?
-
This explosion should havesurprised no close observer, for Japan, since September of 1940, had been a formal military allyof Nazi Germany—our shooting foe in the North Atlantic.
If this is true, why do people call the attack on Pearl Harbor a "sneak attack"?
-
Congress, respondingto public pressures
Weren't there still isolationists who wanted to avoid war?
-
The inevitable clashes with submarines ensued
This is the second time he uses the word "inevitable." He seems to be arguing that war could not be avoided.
-
1961Little, Brown and Company, Boston • Toronto
What was going on in 1961 that might have affected this author or this textbook?
-
fateful dice
This writer uses vivid imagery. Isn't this strange in a textbook?
-
-
Local file Local file
-
Historians nowemphasize the role of a century-long campaign against Asian immigrants living on the WestCoas
Roger Daniels, The Politics of Prejudice: The Anti-Japanese Movement in California and the Struggle for Japanese Exclusion (1962)
-
Historians nowemphasize the role of a century-long campaign against Asian immigrants living on the WestCoast.
What historians?
-
Historians nowemphasize the role of a century-long campaign against Asian immigrants living on the WestCoast
What historians argue this?
-
reports fromNaval Intelligence, the FBI, and the Army General Staff dismissing any threat of sabotage,espionage or invasion.
Who wrote these reports and what evidence did they use?
-
Crystal City, Texas, also interned many of the 2,264Japanese Latin Americans deported from their countries so that the US might exchange them forAmericans held by Japan in 1942 and 1943
How many Japanese Latin Americans were exchanged for Americans held by Japan? What happened to them? How were they treated in Japan? What scholarship is there on this topic? Is there a monument to them in Crystal City, Japan, or in Latin America? This could be a good group project topic.
-
War Relocation Authority (WRA)
What was the War Relocation Authority? Who created it and why?
-