3,456 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2023
  2. hlee2543.substack.com hlee2543.substack.com
    1. Upon my journey of scouring through past Google Docs to find the perfect combination of writing pieces I have created since entering college, I have arrived at a ratio of two college essays, two personal reflection academic essays, and two extracurricular essays

      phrasing. try:

      After scouring Google Docs to find the perfect combination of pieces I've written since entering college, I settled on two college essays, two personal reflection academic essays, and two extracurricular essays.

    1. my work doesn’t clash with any of the many previously published work and research in the discursive context of Petr

      such as? part of what we're looking for here is information about the discursive context. what figures did you engage with? what views were espoused? what texts did you draw from? where does your work fit in to the discourse?

    2. lab-grown meat and its viability as a future food source for a GE class. This was one of those rare instances of required writing that I didn’t sign up for.

      curious transition. maybe begin with something related to your major

    3. voluntary writing sprinkled amidst all of the rough drafts and revision

      for some writers, drafts and revisions are attendant to their voluntary work, too

    1. The text mainly responds to the countless different theories as to what certain metaphors in the text mean.

      where did your knowledge of those theories come from?

    1. .

      not sure about the keroauc interlude, in part because the objective of part 1 appears to be establishing your own pre-visualization of future status and determination; can't say i buy kerouac a figure projecting these qualities, at least not in the way you describe

    2. But what was ahead of me?

      keroauc seems focused on the possibility in the sentence you've cited; your question suggests a different view of the future, something closer to fate or destiny. or maybe even something you can actualize through discipline (as with guitar). it's hard to imagine kerouac practicing 4 hours a day; his work is more impulsive. do you recognize the distinction between the line you've cited and your own self presentation in this essay?

    1. .

      this ending is a bit abrupt. we still don't know what kind of art you specialize in, or how (and in what way) you've synthesized the experiences described above into an artistic identity

    2. To my knowledge it was a fun show to keep my young mind distracted. Cartoons weren’t an art form. It wasn’t something to be studied or analyzed. It was some made up story to keep children occupied.

      this is what you thought as a child? or what you were told?

    3. Even at a young age, I considered why. Why this color? Why this setting? Why this song? I never knew how analytical I was of cartoons as a child.

      seems a bit contradictory. you never knew, but you did it (and remember it)

    1. Each report would follow a specific format: an introduction, a data and methods paragraph, a results paragraph, a discussion paragraph, and a list of references.

      conventions of the genre? of required formatting in that particular class?

    2. I was sick for a 3 week period nearing the end of the semester and the beginning of finals. This made it difficult to concentrate and finish with ease.

      here's an opportunity to elaboration. why was it difficult? one sentence would suffice: "my illness weakened me, and the medication I was on made me incredibly sleepy."

    1. It was only after several years in middle and high school (the spring of my sophomore year) did I deviate from this path and begin moving towards my profession today.

      what pulled you away from wishing to become an imagineer?

    2. This event was my first ever musical, The Wizard of Oz, where I portrayed the role of “Witch’s Guard #3” during my third grade school year

      how did this casting come to pass?

    1. context is needed to understand my summer project,

      no doubt. and that's what we're interested in here. say more about the voices populating that space.

    2. I also do enjoy the process of writing enough to prefer writing essays over taking tests or participating in discussions, however I wouldn’t typically go out of my way to write a creative piece for myself.

      phrasing. try:

      I enjoy writing. In fact, I prefer writing essays to taking tests or participating in discussions. But I wouldn't typically go out of my way to write a creative piece for myself.

    3. This first essay was for a GSEM, and was an explanatory writing meant to help me further understand the concept of the picturesque

      maybe combine this with the first sentence so that you don't introduce the paper twice

    4. rigid with the organization of my writing, since that is what I am constantly exposed to

      not sure i follow your meaning here. exposed to by whom and in what sense?

    1. .

      take-aways: a bit disjointed; there seems to be an assumption at work that the reader has as much knowledge about your experiences as you do and therefore doesn't require context; the theme of connected interests emerges, which has promise in relation to the string metaphor; phrasing issues.

    2. all had something in common

      consider developing this notion of connection further. it may be that the string metaphor has the most promise, as it allows you to see these connections. Whereas, the wave metaphor seems more appropriate to illustrate something coming into view (being brought ashore).

    1. .

      what are you actually saying? loving them from the moment of discovery onward and playing them from that moment are two different things, and i doubt the latter is true, even for a prodigy

    2. Sometimes, the things we love the most are the hardest to explain why we love them.

      something about this formulation seems off to me. maybe try: sometimes, it's hard to explain why we love the things we love most.

  3. annaleighbos.substack.com annaleighbos.substack.com
    1. .

      a good overview of what your guidebook does, but we need more details furnishing the discursive space within which your guidebooks exists. other than watanabe, to whom (or what) else did you turn for information/understanding? who's views influenced you or played a significant role in your work? where does your work fit in to the broader discussion?

    2. This paper examined how spiritual spaces’ use in Tibet’s capital

      this paper examines how the use of spiritual spaces in Tibet's capital has changed ...

    3. although utilized critical thinking and involved spatial elements,

      phrasing. try:

      ... despite using critical thinking and involving spatial elements ...

    1. .

      fair enough. in a way, what you describe reminds me of what i refer to as instrumental vs. intellectual writing. the former encompasses required administrative writing; the latter, the work I produce for the benefit of my field

    2. .

      you could go further with this contextual analysis. what's the discursive realm in which your article exists? what materials have you engaged with contributed to perceptions of the game? what commentators' views (about USC basketball) informed your views?

    3. The grades for these essays are my main motivation the majority of the time and always seem to have a negative effect on the final product.

      fair enough. they're not really "writing," just regurgitation

    4. I was trying to write what I thought my teacher would consider a “good grade.”

      phrasing. try:

      i tried to write what i thought would earn a good grade

      OR

      i tried to write something i thought my professor would find impressive

    5. I feel the more freedom I have in writing a given assignment, the more enjoyment I get from the finished product.

      cut the opening meta-discourse: The more freedom I have in writing a given assignment, the more enjoyment I get from the finished product.

    1. In this piece, I was given an article, responded to discussion questions, arranged the discussion questions into a formal outline and the formal outline configured into essay format.

      phrasing

      For this assignment, the instructor gave us a reading and some discussion questions. From there, we were instructed to use the discussion questions to assemble an outline and craft an essay.

    2. .

      not a lot here about the discursive context of the personal statement your wrote. here, you'd want to think about the materials that you read/engaged with in order to produce the statement. for instance, reference materials, sample statements, advice from counselors, etc. what knowledge did you draw upon to write this statement? where does you approach to writing personal statements fit in the broader discussion about how to craft such a document?

    3. One assignment in particular, was an extra credit assignment, in which we were prompted to research and discuss former president Donald Trump’s indictmen

      which one? are you taking this class currently?

    1. finding her voice as a “real human being” instead of just a student who would churn out papers simply because she was required to do so. This was especially apparent in one of my favorite essays that I have written since entering college, where I analyzed the evolution of the romance genre in film by examining the differences between the films Roman Holiday and Before Sunrise (“Oh, Isn’t It Lovely”).

      phrasing. try:

      I was focused on learning to write like a "real human being" rather than a student forced to churn out required papers. My preoccupation with "real writing" is particularly evident in an analysis I wrote of the films Roman Holiday and Before Sunrise. This essay is among the best things I've written since entering college.

  4. lucaemerson.substack.com lucaemerson.substack.com
    1. reate the necessary conditions in the future to produce my best work possible, regardless of what I am writing about.

      take-aways: the key seems to be writing about things that interest you. maybe it would be fair to say, concerning your philosophy course, that the class and its subject matter weren't intrinsically boring or bad, just not for you

    2. The rhetoric of this text reveals that the intended audience is anyone, but realistically will appeal mostly to individuals who are already concerned with environmental issues and corporate misconduct

      how? there's a lot of telling here and very little showing.

    3. truly to express how I felt about the issue

      sure. and to that end, it's important that you articulate here the contours of the fracking debate as you understand them. what commentators did you engage with while working on this essay? what are the major arguments being made? by whom? with whom do you align yourself? distance yourself from? where does your argument fit in?

    4. subjectivity in their morality to be incredibly intriguing

      what do you mean? maybe elaborate. SC justices use case law to rule in one direction of the other.

    5. Another difference in my process of writing this letter is that I read it to all of my roommates before sending it, and each of them had ideas and insight as to how to make it bette

      cool

    6. the range of engagement on my writing began with me and ended with my professor.

      was there anything that could have been done to increase socialization and collaboration? either by your, your classmates, or the prof?

    7. assignment description because I had regretfully not done all of the readings, which I found to be far longer than necessary, overly exhaustive and thoroughly uninteresting

      what do you mean by assignment description? do yo mean you have to look up cliff's notes?

    1. .

      take-aways: not sure I see a through-line -- the erroneous date doesn't transfer over to the other examples; how does keaton's illusion, not to mention his knowledge, map on to your experience?

    2. When Buster Keaton stepped from a real world stage onto a projector screen in

      maybe clarify for those unfamiliar. does the film depict him stepping onto a "projector screen"?

    1. As I waswriting another demo for one of the song and curing a release of another one on Spotify

      not sure how this connects to the previous sentence. also, phrasing.

    1. .

      take-aways: not sure i see the through-line; the physics stuff at the beginning seems almost unnecessary; the turn to acting abrupt. are there elements of quantum mechanics that carried over somehow? do you see a connection that could help readers understand? or is the point of the story randomness?

    2. I had been subjected to bullying for as long as I can

      keep verb tense consistent: I have been .. for as long as I can ...

      maybe say, "Far from being popular, I was often bullied."

    1. .

      take-aways: for an essay ostensibly about a love for screenwriting, there's not a lot here about screenwriting; help the links-in-a-chain metaphor along by showing connections between what you were reading and what you gradually started writing; your title quickly fades from view (maybe consider replacing and removing car metaphor)

    1. .

      did you engage with any texts in writing this assignment? did your draw from an materials that augmented or in any way enhanced your view of the discursive context of your assignment?

    2. It was enjoyable to witness others with struggles similar to mine and held the same outlook, yet I wish I was able to provide more variety in viewpoints without making the teacher think I am trying to invalidate my own viewpoint.

      phrasing. try:

      It was enjoyable to witness others with struggles similar to mine [sounds a bit sadistic] and held the same outlook [maybe cut, as the relation isn't clear], yet I wish I [was able to] could provide more variety in viewpoints without making the teacher think I am trying to invalidate my own viewpoint [was the critique that your contradicted yourself?]

    1. ).

      This section is less successful than the previous one. What commentators are you aware of in the discursive contexts surrounding your topic? What points of view do they espouse? Who do you agree with? Disagree with? Who's work did you draw from most often? Where does your point of view fit in?

    1. .

      why not discuss it in more detail, maybe even by including an excerpt? the main reason would be to show rather than tell how your application statement (itself a rigid, highly structured writing genre) developed in a "fluid" way consequent to CWII

    1. .

      take-aways: this seems to be an essay about adaptability-- that is, identifying the steps that will produce high grades for more conventional writing assignments; exploiting the freedoms of more irregular writing assignments; not too much about the pieces themselves, however, or the story they tell.