- Mar 2021
As to opinions about the shortcomings of the language itself, or the standard run-times, it’s important to realize that every developer has a different background, different experience, different needs, temperament, values, and a slew of other cultural motivations and concerns — individual opinions will always be largely personal and, to some degree, non-technical in nature.
- everyone has different preferences
- non-technical reasons
- annotation meta: may need new tag
- software project created to address shortcomings in another project
- what is important/necessary for one person may not be for another
- good point
- reaction / reacting to
- everyone has different background/culture/experience
- software preferences are personal
- runtime environment
- Jan 2019
I respect the idealism of blockchain developers who, I believe, are sincere in their faith that they are building a better world. But I am confounded by their inability to see that they are falling victim to exactly the same fallacies their hacker forebears embraced: this notion that we can code ourselves out of the deep holes we’ve dug; that we are building utopias in our virtualities that will finesse away the imperfections of human character.
Contrary to mainstream thinking that this new technology is unregulated, it’s really quite the opposite. These systems apply the strictest of rules under highly deterministic and predictable models that are regulated through mathematics. In the future, industry will be regulated not just by institutions and committees but by algorithms and mathematics. The new technology will gradually out-regulate the regulators and, in many cases, make them obsolete because the new system offers more certainty. Antonopoulos explains that “the opposite of authoritarianism is not chaos, but autonomy.”
<big>评：</big><br/><br/>1933 年德国包豪斯设计学院被纳粹关闭，大部分师生移民到美国，他们同时也把自己的建筑风格带到了美利坚。尽管人们在严格的几何造型上感受到了冷漠感，但是包豪斯主义致力于美术和工业化社会之间的调和，力图探索艺术与技术的新统一，促使公众思考——「如何成为更完备的人」？而这一点间接影响到了我们现在所熟知的美国式人格。<br/><br/>区块链最终会超越「人治」、达到「算法自治」的状态吗？类似的讨论声在人工智能领域同样不绝于耳。「绝对理性」站到了完备人格的对立面，这种冰冷的特质标志着人类与机器交手后的败退。过去有怀疑论者担心，算法的背后实际上由人操控，但随着「由算法生成」的算法，甚至「爷孙代自承袭」算法的出现，这样的担忧逐渐变得苍白无力——我们有了更大的焦虑：是否会出现 “blockchain-based authoritarianism”？