- Mar 2024
-
www.404media.co www.404media.co
-
- Jun 2022
-
Local file Local file
-
We’ve been conditioned to view information through aconsumerist lens: that more is better, without limit.
-
- May 2022
-
Local file Local file
-
What does it look like to move from mindless consumption tomindful creation?
Collecting ideas and creating links between them in a zettelkasten can seemingly solve this problem with "little" work. :)
-
-
www.thecut.com www.thecut.com
-
Matt Taibbi asked his subscribers in April. Since they were “now functionally my editor,” he was seeking their advice on potential reporting projects. One suggestion — that he write about Ibram X. Kendi and Robin DiAngelo — swiftly gave way to a long debate among readers over whether race was biological.
There's something here that's akin to the idea of bikeshedding? Online communities flock to the low lying ideas upon which they can proffer an opinion and play at the idea of debate. If they really cared, wouldn't they instead delve into the research and topics themselves? Do they really want Taibbi's specific take? Do they want or need his opinion on the topic? What do they really want?
Compare and cross reference this with the ideas presented by Ibram X. Kendi's article There Is No Debate Over Critical Race Theory.
Are people looking for the social equivalent of a simple "system one" conversation or are they ready, willing, and able to delve into a "system two" presentation?
Compare this also with the modern day version of the Sunday morning news (analysis) shows? They would seem to be interested in substantive policy and debate, but they also require a lot of prior context to participate. In essence, most speakers don't actually engage, but spew out talking points instead and rely on gut reactions and fear, uncertainty and doubt to make their presentations. What happened to the actual discourse? Has there been a shift in how these shows work and present since the rise of the Hard Copy sensationalist presentation? Is the competition for eyeballs weakening these analysis shows?
How might this all relate to low level mansplaining as well? What are men really trying to communicate in demonstrating this behavior? What do they gain in the long run? What is the evolutionary benefit?
All these topics seem related somehow within the spectrum of communication and what people look for and choose in what and how they consume content.
-
- Apr 2022
-
winnielim.org winnielim.org
-
https://winnielim.org/experiments/content-and-form/questioning-the-way-we-display-content/
So many interesting questions and thoughts hiding here.
-
- May 2021
-
harpers.org harpers.org
-
Think of the most common forms of influencer content: There are makeup tutorials and exercise regimens and tips for heterodox diets. There are bathroom selfies and self-portraits in bed and endless I just woke up confessions.
-
- Apr 2021
-
www.washingtonpost.com www.washingtonpost.com
-
Terry is concerned by those commonly cited statistics revealing how little time museumgoers spend looking at art, but more upsetting is that most people don’t feel welcome in museums at all. “They’re looking for zero seconds,” he says.
Being welcoming and inviting can be an important thing. If you're not, then your material is not even considered.
-