3 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2021
  2. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
    Opposition to Novel Biotechnologies: Testing An Omission Bias Account
    1
    1. jackiekrauss 24 Sep 2021

      Halstead, I., Lewis, G., & McKay, R. (2021). Opposition to Novel Biotechnologies: Testing An Omission Bias Account. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4ef7m

      is:preprint lang:en COVID-19 biotechnology bias omission bias vaccine vaccination decision making gene editing nanotechnology decision making risk choice
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    psyarxiv.com/4ef7m/
  3. Jan 2019
  4. static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
    muckelbauer_hawhee_posthuman_rhetorics+(1).pdf
    1
    1. lhm8 25 Jan 2019
      n amalgam of amphibian neural webbing andsynthetic DNA

      Because that's always a good idea...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurassic_World

      Gene editing Jurassic World
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    static1.squarespace.com/static/57eea84b414fb53a002780f4/t/5d1f715449d9a700019d0f8d/1562341717900/muckelbauer_hawhee_posthuman_rhetorics+(1).pdf
  5. Nov 2018
  6. www.nature.com.ezproxy.rice.edu www.nature.com.ezproxy.rice.edu
    Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage
    1
    1. pbk1 13 Nov 2018
      low rates of indels (typically no more than 0.1%

      0.1% is still a lot from a theraputic standpoint!

      gene editing off target
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    nature.com.ezproxy.rice.edu/articles/nature24644