8 Matching Annotations
- Jun 2021
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
RichardBrown on Twitter: “@Richard_Florida Still pretty slow recovery in London too @nicolegelinas. Https://t.co/nH9FOpV386” / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved June 29, 2021, from https://twitter.com/MinorPlaces/status/1407018950714605574
-
- Apr 2020
-
accessmedicine.mhmedical.com accessmedicine.mhmedical.com
-
Patients with persistent pneumothorax, large air leaks after tube thoracostomy, or difficulty ventilating should undergo fiber-optic bronchoscopy to exclude a tracheobronchial injury or presence of a foreign body.
-
If the chest tube output is initially 20% of the patient’s blood volume (80 mL/kg) or is persistently >1 to 2 mL/kg per hour, thoracotomy should be considered.
-
Persistent hemorrhage from a chest tube after blunt trauma most often is due to injured intercostal arteries; for unusual persistent bleeding
-
Bronchoscopy should be performed to evaluate the trachea in patients with a persistent air leak from the chest tube or mediastinal air.
-
The most common injuries from both blunt and penetrating thoracic trauma are hemothorax and pneumothorax. More than 85% of patients can be definitively treated with a chest tube. The indications for thoracotomy include significant initial or ongoing hemorrhage from the tube thoracostomy and specific imaging-identified diagnoses (Table 7-10). One caveat concerns the patient who presents after a delay. Even when the initial chest tube output is 1.5 L, if the output ceases and the lung is reexpanded, the patient may be managed nonoperatively if hemodynamically stable.
chest tube can treat 85% of hemo/pneumothoraxes, if significant bleeding from tube thoracostomy initially or ongoing was present, thoracotomy is indicated. patient delayed presentation is a caveat. nonop manageing is possible in stable patient with ceased output and rexpanded lungs even after 1.5 L output.
-
- Mar 2017
-
-
The London transport manager has created a ‘Walk the Tube’ map, which shows how long it takes to totter between stations.
This is so cool!
-
- Feb 2017
-
bigthink.com bigthink.com
-
In 2013, it was around $325,000 to make this stuff in a lab, but the process has been refined, and the cost now is just $11.36.
Is it good though?
-