if we do turn our attention to the individual journeys that young people takethrough their educational, social, recreational and civic worlds, we see a marked absenceof clear “ladders” or sequential “pathways” of civic development. Instead we seemoments of activation when an affinity space is under threat, or periods of engagementwhen a cause becomes relevant to a deeply held identity or value
Is this a casual observation or do we believe the lack of a formal structure of "this is how to do Connected Civics" is a problem to doing Connected Civics?