535 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
  2. Oct 2024
    1. Better understanding of what learning described by credentials prepares earners to do in theworkforce, at the skill level. This may be a reframing of competencies toward position descriptionlanguage

      Employers want to know what credentials are credentialing, and they want to hear it in their own language. The temptation will be to convince faculty and others to revise descriptions, however the opportunity is in leaving that and instead seeking their consensus and comfort with interpreting their descriptions into the languages of employers.

      • Page 17: Top 5 most important factors for creating an effective teaching and learning ecosystem: Having a strong leadership and vision (45%) is the #1 (next highest is 15%)
      • Page 20: *83% of higher education respondents said that it was important for institutions to provide studens with skills-based learning alongside their academic education. *
      • Page 26: Participants identified several challenges in fostering a a culture of lifelong learning for professionals, including: 89% Clear learning objectives
      • Page 7: Real-world experiential and work-based learning are no longer fringe; 4 in 5 see these as essential.
    1. Increasingly, our partners are interested in building collections - or connecting to - credentials that they don’t own, issue, or offer to show learners the full pathways of learning opportunities that they can pursue.

      Example of how this gets operationalized: There will be platforms (think Naviance on big data and personalized data steroids) that will help Learners discover right fit opportunities based in part on the credentials they already have. There will be savvy institutions connecting to others' credentials so as to increase the likelihood that Learners discover those institutions' program offerings. This will be akin to a sort of skill-based SEO approach as a recruitment/admissions strategy.

  3. Sep 2024
    1. One participant noted that local credentials,that is, from local colleges, were more highly valued because they almost certainly had examples ofhires with the same credentials
    2. Resume parsers will now have better and slightly more detailed credential information to pass onto client systems—confirmation of a credential with a standardized name and associated skills
    3. while there was certainly discussion with workshopparticipants about more specific changes to their hiring tools, thefundamental issue at the root of each major challenge was inadequateinformation about candidates
    4. wants more consistent/trustworthy data
    5. major HRIS system providers, from offering a full stack of proprietarysolutions to adopting a platform model that supports integrations with a range of third-party services
    6. On the otherhand, there are legitimate concerns about how well resumes may be translated into structureddata via parsing.
    7. This is consistent with what their peers report generally: one study suggests that almosthalf of companies do not know how to gauge a candidate’s skills based on a non-degree credential.12
    8. The top four HR platforms according to Forbes13 all have marketplaces showcasing 300+ partnerintegrations. These platforms’ integration capabilities mean that established providers of traditionalbackground check services have a path to incorporate non-degree verification into their offerings
    9. In addition to service providers, a new class of information consolidator, the Learning andEmployment Record (LER) wallet providers, may find benefit in joining the partner marketplaces. AnLER wallet is envisioned to be an application where credential holders can store their credentials ina safe, private way, giving the holder an ability to curate and share more comprehensive informationabout formal and informal education activity, along with other achievements. A key value of LERwallets is that credential information can only be stored in them if they have been verified by theissuer
    10. At a minimum, we hope this discussion willencourage HR leaders to work with their HR technology providers to broaden access to the fieldsoffered by the parsing companies in system integrations
    11. Parsing algorithms that translate unstructured resume data into a set of variables thatcorrespond to fields in an ATS or HRIS implementation are sometimes maintained in-house bythe HR technology companies. In a large number of cases, however, resume parsing is a serviceprovided by a handful of companies. These companies have all been in business for decadesand process incredible volumes of data on a daily basis. We estimate that, collectively, thesecompanies process ten million resumes a day or three billion resumes per year.
    12. This kind of data could potentially enhance his understanding of what sources generateapplicants who work out best and what experiences correlate most highly with more successfulhiring outcomes
    13. having better information can help Malik address the common queryfrom unsuccessful applicants about why they weren’t selected and allow him to proactively offerguidance on what they might seek to earn
    14. helps him turn a pool of rejected applicantsinto a pipeline of potential future candidates that will let him achieve even better, more cost-effective efficiency
    15. data does exist, but doesn’t yet flow through theecosystem in a consistent and high-quality way
    16. stored data that he can analyze
    17. more connected data,
    18. Just as skills information can begin to flow from the curricular skills data source to the resumeparsers, a similar connection can be created between the curriculum data source and non-degreecredential data sources
    19. Additionalawareness and use of digital credentials may also attract the attention of the traditional third-partycredential verification companies or larger wallet creators.
    20. For Jake, the high school graduate applying for jobs, the application process shifts away from being agame of how to pick the perfect keywords for his resume. Instead, he is matched by the actual skillsacquired in his recent community college coursework and EdX certificate. Both Jake and the hiringmanager he will soon meet have a more equitable and accurate path through the noise of today’sonline hiring process.

      Simple, elegant explanation: it moves from clumsy proxies that screen out qualified people like Jake, to powerful and sophisticated matching that connect opportunities to people like Jake who have the verified skills to deserve those opportunities.

    21. This interconnected ecosystem allows for improvements that HR leaderswould most like to see: better whole-person evaluation, better leverage of candidate skills, bettercredential verification, and more reliable information on what makes a good candidate

      The value proposition, as presented here, is all about the wheel being more efficient, more effective, and less expensive in identifying, hiring, and retaining cogs. What might be magical is the rare nexus of what being best for the wheel also being good for the cogs, us humans who this work is hopefully really about.

    22. integrationswith the mission-focused LER wallet companies or the entrance of a few general-purpose walletproviders, such as ApplePay or GooglePay, into the hiring ecosystem. Both Apple and Google arealready experimenting with housing digital driver’s license information for a number of U.S. states, andexpansion into storing digital credential information may be a viable, incremental step for them

      Might some see this as a call to pay close attention, get involved, and push for public/public good solutions? Or will we default to leaning on FAANG to provide our "free" wallets and control or even own more of our data?

    23. Increased awareness of digital credentials and more demanding HR expectations may also encouragea range of other types of integrations

      Ecosystem is held back by lack of awareness and (probably unwitting) low expectations.

    24. data about the nature of the non-degree credential experience can includethe kind of information provided by EQOS

      EQOS, a JFF service, is one of several options in the space.

    25. higher confidence

      Higher confidence => Higher trust

    26. Examples of these sources would include an established digital walletprovider, or an exhaustive catalogue of digital credentials that are available, such as the repositoryhosted by Credential Engine. Having the curricular data source, which has a connection to the parsingcompanies, also create a connection to credential information opens up a connection, albeit anindirect one, between the non-degree credential information and the parsing activity. Instead ofreceiving just a course name from the resume parser, the intermediary can also receive a non-degreecredential identifier that is sent to the credential data source to look up and return skills information

      Opportunity to go deep here. Bread crumb is to check out the issuer directory with Credential Engine, where they are inviting institutions to publish details about their credentials in a standardized format (CTDL) that will hopefully one day be consumed by connections like those hinted at here.

    27. One example of a curriculum data source is OpenSyllabus.org, a non-profit that hosts acomprehensive repository of higher ed course information. OpenSyllabus.org can serve as a value-added provider that sends skill information about specific college coursework to the parsers. This willexpand the potential skill information parsers can associate with a resume, going beyond what mightbe gleaned only from reading a course or degree title. They would now have access to informationderived from more detailed course catalog descriptions or even course syllabi information. Parserswill be able to send more extensive lists of skills over to companies’ HR platforms in a structuredformat they can immediately utilize. This integration also captures the skills from a particular type ofnon-degree credential - the coursework completed by the 40 million people in the U.S. who have somecollege, but no degree.

      This might catch the attention of HE people paying attention. It also hopefully connects to the participants who shared that they are not getting the information about the programs that they desire. If the data being consumed (by this vendor or others) is still rooted in describing the content of the learning and not the measurable, assessed outcomes, then it's utility is limited and, crucially, it could create trust issues that make consumer wary of all the data. On the other hand, if they can trust the high quality data, there will be a window of competitive advantage for HE institutions that choose to share the data that the consumers (largely employers) want to see.

    28. As a first step in connecting more and better data to candidate profiles, we propose workingwith the resume-parsing companies to expand the skills information they extract and transmit fromapplications. To do this, it is necessary to identify a small number of value-added providers managinga large source of useful information that the resume itself doesn’t typically include

      Don't reinvent. Start with important players already invested. Describe the value TO THEM. (For some, it could be helping them see that they are only dominant bc there's no alternative; this new approach will either give them greater advantage or be the competitive disadvantage that destroys them.

    29. None of the jobs weapplied for, even with companies who were forward-leaning in the LER space, included an option toconnect or share an LER as part of the application we submitted. This lack of implementation standsin stark contrast to the incredible volume of reliance on resumes

      The need is there. This is a hammer with very clear, very costly nails.

    30. simply having technology available does notguarantee its use by end users without substantial investment in change management

      This is also about Change Management

    31. The lack of reliable and consistent information about non-degree credentials presented by candidatesin the hiring process also meant that workshop participants had no information to classify candidatespost-hire. This gap made it impossible to know who among the employee base had earned whichcredentials. Without this basic profile data, HR leaders are unable to gather much-needed insight intowhat types of credentials appear to prepare candidates best for a given role or which credentialsappear to be more effective at training than others

      This could play into Credential Quality Assurance work in Higher Ed.

    32. a lack of intuitive visualizations were alsoidentified as places for improvement

      "The dashboard isn't concise enough!" Also: "We need more data visualizations!"

    33. Due to the relative novelty of LER wallets, both applicant adoption and employer awareness remainlimited. This lack of familiarity has resulted in minimal client demand to integrate LER wallets intohiring workflow tools. Consequently, major HRIS platforms do not currently support APIs for data flowdirectly from LER wallets.

      KEY FINDING. This is one of the most important takeaways of the report, especially in regard to LERs. It's also important to note the lack of familiarity when considering other survey data about innovative credentials: if participants have limited understanding of the stuff they are being asked about, how much should we read into the data about their (possibly inaccurate) perceptions?

    34. eliminates the backend verification work that is so burdensome

      Value proposition in the automation leading to time and effort savings that eliminate human tasks.

    35. In contrast to the badge information screens in Figure 10, HR leaders expressed strong preferencefor the concise summaries on the mocked-up HRIS screen. They also appreciated keeping theinformation in the flow of work, thereby minimizing the need to consider yet another tool or interface

      TWO THINGS: 1. The shiny interface is for humans, not machines. Are the participants assuming that they are looking at the interface for all of the candidates or just the top candidates? 2. If participants know that they are only seeing an interface like Figure 10 for top candidates, would they still desire something more concise or would the narrative be right-sized?

    36. information about trainingcontent and skills was important, but only one aspect of how they determined if credentials wereof interest. They also wanted some understanding of the quality of the training. Some of the parsingcompanies have created scores that might help HR leaders understand credential quality, but theworkshop participants told us quite clearly that they didn’t like these kinds of scores. To them, scoringsystems felt very black box in nature and were generally not trusted.

      Consumers want quality. They also are wary of quality assessment. Trend currently appears to align with historical defaults of using proxies instead of precise, targeted measurements (eg Using length of seat time and GPA instead of competency-based assessments)

    37. Ideas for More Actionable InformationIn discussion with HR leaders helping imagine process improvement, we learned that the informationcurrently curated for digital badges was helpful, but perhaps not quite hitting the mark. Workshopparticipants told us two things about the kind of information found in Figure 9: it was overwhelming,and it missed key facts they wanted to know.In their view, the sum of information presented on badge websites is a bit dense and very focused onthe nature and content of the training

      KEY FINDING: it's a problem if the context focuses on the nature of the content instead of the nature of what the credential is credentialing.

    38. the findings alsorevealed a genuinely inconsistent interpretation of less traditional education experiences. Part of theproblem appears to be widespread industry confusion regarding the distinction between certificates,certifications, and short-form courses.

      The risk of HE not mapping our lexicon to that of employers is that our learners' credentials may suffer devaluation because they are failing to communicate what the consumers need to know.

    39. Most notably, application times were very different, ranging from a swift two-minute process tomore than 45 minutes. Some organizations appeared more sensitive to reports that a key concern ofcandidates is how long it takes to apply for a job.1

      Time to apply is a COST that may limit applicant pools for employers.

    40. Briana aims to enhance efficiency by leveraging technology to better manage andverify credentials, potentially exploring solutions that simplify the integration of professional socialmedia profiles that have been linked to government-recognized credentials. Briana’s main concern,however, is that she is unclear whether the company developing the platform she uses to store HRinformation is committed to supporting these kinds of integrations

      For these ecosystems to be healthy, the interconnected nodes. function in harmony. They are aware of the other nodes' desires and intentionally seek to meet those needs. A barrier to progress is technology solutions that can function to meet important needs yet do not. (Positive assumption here that the developers either don't properly understand their users' needs or don't properly understand how to capture ROI if they do design to meet those needs; not that they know the needs and choose not to address them)

    41. Stage Three: Expandingthe EcosystemLeverage new demand from end-usercompanies that have access to additionalinformation to justify more integrationsbetween data sources and HR tools

      Ecosystem expansion might rely on market incentives for additional parties to connect, synthesize, and operationalize data. Important to consider that this is not limited to HR vendors; it's also about their clients, as well as other vendors that may be better enabled to connect with (L)earners to market Navigation services, coaching, scholarship and lending programs, educational/training/upskilling opportunities, and more. In a future of direct admissions, there are multiple roles in this ecosystem. And, of course, there is much opportunity and value for the human (L)earners at the center of the ecosystem.

    42. Once these connections are established,expand data flow to include the additionalinformation about non-degree credentialsdesired by HR leaders

      KEY: data is what the Consumers desire, not necessarily what the learning providers want to describe.

  4. Aug 2024
    1. “The Creative Edge” report was the degree to which hiring managers see these self-efficacy skills reflected in candidates who have achieved digital credentials. In comments and interviews, hiring managers noted that they view candidates who have made the effort to obtain digital credentials as self-motivated, ambitious, and dedicated. 53 percent of hiring managers in the study said that having a digital credential demonstrates a candidate is committed to professional development

      This mirrors UPCEA survey data that beyond what credentials are credentialing, consumers assign a strong signal to credentials around earners' self-motivation and personal growth.

    2. In the list of top ten skills rising in importance between now and 2027, three relate to self-efficacy: “curiosity and lifelong learning” (ranked fourth), “resilience, flexibility, and agility” (ranked fifth), and “motivation and self-awareness” (ranked eighth).

      Durable skills that are valued by Consumers and could be noticed, named, and credentialed.

    1. What metrics do you use to measure your success?The process of aligning strategic priorities to the UMS Micro-Credential Initiative led us to create aprimary goal for our students.

      Easy change management to overlook: How will we know that we are successful? What we measure is what we prioritize, and what we prioritize is usually strategic.

    2. Excel for Storytellers: The Co-Design Process

      Really interesting case study.

    3. those institutionsthriving within the changing landscape of higher education continue to make it easy for peopleto unbundle and rebundle their education and training, allowing them to personalize and bestmeet their career and personal goals. In the area of microcredentials, “stackability” arose as afeature more than any other—designing credentials to stack towards other, larger credentialsand as pathways towards credit-bearing degrees. While some of our consortium institutionswere further along than others in this regard (for example, National University only buildsprograms from components that are stackable), all ten institutions embraced the intent tomake all new programs stackable. UPCEA believes that stackability is critical to the success ofboth microcredentials and degree-granting programs. Students are demanding these options.In addition, allowing rebundling and stackability requires strong operations and advising,

      It is vital to strategically decide where an institution does/doesn't want to play in this particular sandbox. It is also essential to support intentions with policies, systems, processes and practices (eg operations, advising, etc) that will allow the intentions to become sustainable realities.

    4. We learned that an institution’s alumni were an underutilized resource to explore and establishcommunity partnerships.

      Alumni Association as key stakeholder.

    5. Other elements specific to sustainable business models include:► Building business models that accurately account for all expenses, including the fixed costsof existing technology, as well as staff and faculty salaries. When existing faculty and staff areutilized (from marketing to instructional design, to instruction itself) it is important to expensetheir time estimates or percent of workload into the program pro forma.► We encourage institutions to generate multi-year break-even enrollment/revenueprojections for each program established. These projections became important“touchstones” for year-to-year assessment of program growth and health.► Those institutions creating comprehensive marketing plans, unique for each new programestablished, had the best success in their marketing efforts. A useful marketing tool is togenerate “personas” to better understand the likely population who will be attracted toparticular programs.► The use of formal and signed Memos of Understanding (MOUs) early in programdevelopment were important to clarify and solidify partner expectations. Additionally,MOUs were a valuable vehicle to discuss and ultimately settle the important program andbudgetary topics above.

      Key financial/budgetary/business operations considerations to strategically plan upfront.

    6. It is important to shore up internal support within and across the institution, includingidentifying and cultivating “champions.” Some of these champions should be centraldecision-makers within an institution who can make decisions campuswide

      Leaders must lead.

    7. overwhelmingly valued microcredentials as a way to upskill/reskill their currentemployees and as an important signifier on a resumé, signaling that their presence indicatedthat a candidate was committed to self-improvement and pursuit of specialized skills

      Interesting that a leading value right now is in signals independent of the credential itself. Will this shift as credentials proliferate?

    8. As institutions compete for a decreasing number of traditionalstudents

      Other UPCEA reports also point out that while there are 3M fewer incoming 18-year-olds than in the past generation, there are over 40M people in the U.S. with some post-secondary participation and no degree/credential.

    9. they should haveone tracking system forthe entire portfolio ofmicrocredential offerings

      Centralized Source of Truth

    10. First, microcredentialsshould be part of thestrategic programportfolio for all institutionsof higher education.Additionally, institutionsshould resource theirmicrocredential activitiesappropriately forsustainability and growth

      This requires executive sponsorship and cabinet-level involvement.

    11. Many institutions did not have a centralized office or system to keep track of microcredentialactivity across that institution.

      Impacts consistency, quality, data stewardship, reporting requirements, governance, etc

    12. but oftenmultiple parties were responsible on campus for employer outreach, which caused confusion

      Avoid creating a cluster. This requires strategic leadership.

    13. Employers were strategic partners and consumers of the content

      As consumers employer partners can bake ROI in from the beginning with reasonable assurance that seats are filled.

    14. deconstructing existing for-credit courses to do so (72%)

      Doesn't require reinventing the wheel; MCs can be meaningful specializations that get credentialed on the way to larger credentials.

    15. 023, UPCEA surveyed 100 individuals from 100 institutions,supplementing those quantitative results through six follow-up focus groups. The full report can befound here

      I've also annotated that report

    16. only 69% said that senior leadership at their institution has embracedmicrocredentials

      Less than 100% and also compelling for the 30% that lack senior leadership embrace to share that "hey, 7 out of 10 leaders do embrace this stuff, so is there a strategic reason why we are choosing to be outliers here?"

    17. (20%) did not include microcredentials as astrategic priority

      Implying that 80% DO include microcredentials as a strategic priority

  5. Jun 2024
    1. The transparent communication of course goals, assessments aligned with objectives, and access to top-tier instructional materials and support resources ensures a holistic and enriching learning experience. Notably, since the implementation of the course template, UF CJC Online has observed a remarkable 25% increase in course completion rates, underscoring the tangible impact of its commitment to quality education

      Increased course completion rates is a huge indicator! Also, K-12 has been hammering transparent goals for a generation, as Marzano and others have demonstrated that a top factor in successful learning is whether or not we support Learners with clear expectations of what they will need to know and be able to do.

    2. consistent learning experience

      Templates for consistency

    3. The template, housed in Canvas, is easy to update to reflect resource and content information changes. In addition, the comprehensive template equips instructors with essential tools, eliminates the need for them to create courses from scratch, and allows them to dedicate their time and expertise to delivering engaging and impactful courses.

      Templates as Strategy: instructors implement Best Practices in part bc it's made easy for them.

    4. the QM Rubric, evaluates various facets of online course design through eight categories, including learning objectives, alignment, assessment strategies, instructional materials, learner interaction, course technology, learner support, accessibility, and usability

      Quality Matters rubric categories

  6. Feb 2024
    1. Among 11,300 roles at large firms, companies increased the share of workers without a bachelor’s degree by about 3.5 percentage points. At the same time, this shift only applied to the 3.6% of roles that dropped a requirement during that time period, which means the net effect is a change of .14 percentage points in incremental hiring of candidates without degrees.

      Degree is still advantageous.

    2. “The skills-based hiring movement has gained momentum, as more and more employers committed to stripping degree requirements from their postings, replacing the proxy of a college degree with actual evaluations of candidate skill,”

      degree as proxy

    1. This is often described as a mainreason why qualification systems not opened to all types of credentials

      Barrier is about burden to status quo...if sustainable process existed, would systems accommodate something that is probably in learners' interests?

    2. attribute a quality label to credentials outsidethe formal system

      Model for HE to value high quality external (non-accredited) credentials

    3. The mainfactors limiting the level of trust include: doubts about the quality of somemicrocredentials, no agreed standards for quality assurance, and uncertainty as towhether certain microcredentials will be recognised by national authorities,employers or education and training providers

      Seeds of doubt on MC quality

    4. Assigning credits to learning outcomes allows for the accumulationof units of learning and provides for transferability from one setting to another forvalidation and recognition. Interviewees representing countries in which VETsystems are modularised indicated that modules are designed to indicate a set oflearning outcomes that are expressed in terms of credits. The interviewees fromnational authorities and VET providers commonly agreed that the introduction ofmodular structures in VET and the application of a learning outcomes-basedapproach was set to provide more individualised training paths, enabling accessand progression for learners.

      Align Learning Outcomes to Credits (key for meaningful unbundling/bundling)

    5. The European approach to microcredentials(European Commission, 2020a) also highlights the importance of clearly definedlearning outcomes as a way to promote overall transparency and provide detailedinformation regarding what a learner is expected to know and is able to do

      Purpose of Learning Outcomes

    6. microcredentials must be transparent and understandable and shouldinclude summary of critical information such as:(a) the title;(b) the duration of a learning activity;(c) provider of the course;(d) description of the content;(e) learning resources;(f) type of assessment;(g) credits attributed to the course;(h) prerequisites needed for enrolment;(i) learning outcomes;(j) body ensuring the quality of the course;(k) options for stackability, if any

      11 data elements for transparency

  7. Jan 2024
    1. Creating Internal Value.

      LERs will give employers internal heat maps of talent

    2. Measuring What Matters

      THIS! Been declaring for ten years how this is all about measuring the stuff that people actually care about.

    3. Refined Incumbent Worker Upskilling

      For industry, the efficiencies are going to be huge cost savers.

    4. unanimously, the employers I’ve talked to would find the greatest value in utilizing learning and employment records that include verified skills data.

      Employers care about skills data that has been measured and assessed

    1. flexibility

      Flexibility in response to learners' is a strategy. When to schedule office hours. When to schedule class messages, due dates/times, etc.

    2. “the practice of purposefully involving minoritized communities throughout a design process with the goal of allowing their voices to directly affect how the solution will address the inequity at hand.”

      Including voice is a practice for embedding equity.

    1. Playbooks have had over 14,000 views by over 6,000 users since published.

      Evidence of proliferation

    2. Recruited 30 new members to the Network to engage in planning and implementation of incremental credentials. Among those are state systems of Hawai'i, Minnesota, the University of Texas, and the City University of New York (CUNY) System; and 24 public and private colleges and universities across 22 states.

      Proliferation of HE commitment, including state systems.

    3. Number of incremental credentials increased from 32 at the start of the US Department of Education IES grant to 131 within the three original states (Colorado, New York, North Carolina)

      4x growth in a year of stackable approaches...and that's just under CAYG

    1. Searching as exploration. White and Roth [71 ,p.38] define exploratory search as a “sense making activity focusedon the gathering and use of information to foster intellectual de-velopment.” Users who conduct exploratory searches are generallyunfamiliar with the domain of their goals, and unsure about howto achieve them [ 71]. Many scholars have investigated the mainfactors relating to this type of dynamic task, such as uncertainty,creativity, innovation, knowledge discovery, serendipity, conver-gence of ideas, learning, and investigation [2, 46, 71].These factors are not always expressed or evident in queriesor questions posed by a searcher to a search system.

      Sometimes, search is not rooted in discovery of a correct answer to a question. It's about exploration. Serendipity through search. Think Michael Lewis, Malcolm Gladwell, and Latif Nasser from Radiolab. The randomizer on wikipedia. A risk factor of where things trend with advanced AI in search is an abandonment of meaning making through exploration in favor of a knowledge-level pursuit that lacks comparable depth to more exploratory experiences.

    1. alternative credential programming and financialmodels are highly decentralized across an institution – so much so that it may bedifficult for an institution to have a good grasp of its entire portfolio. Adding alternativecredentials to an institution’s strategic priorities will firm up program and business modelplanning and execution

      Inconsistent processes for establishing programs, funding programs, and pricing programs

    2. First is the strategic priority within their institution. Ifalternative credentials have been embraced by senior leadership and included in thestrategic plan, they are more likely to have the necessary resources allocated to them

      Executive sponsorship => resources allocated.

  8. Dec 2023
    1. It’s not available to everyone, but a senior leadership who is vocal about lifelong learning can give you greater access to open doors, and people will take it more seriously. Time is never wasted with senior leadership and demonstrating the long-term interest for the institution, communities and companies we serve.

      Executive sponsorship is a $0, very valuable resource.

  9. Sep 2023
    1. When news broke out about Bill Cosby, folks had, and still have, a hard time dissociating his “America’s Dad” and TV persona who was like a father figure and his philanthropy work from the man who “used his enormous power, fame, and prestige” to sexually assault women

      Maybe this is chance to finish 2020 blog post about the complicated nature of shifting our engagements with 2D personalities to 3D people... The questions proposed at the end are helpful in deliberate consideration (vs absolutist takes)

    1. QR Codes can be a great way for teachers to distribute class material. Here are free sites you can use to generate QR codes

      Free QR code sites

  10. Aug 2023
    1. As employers continue to face hurdles in identifying and hiring qualified talent, the potential for skill- and competency-based digital credentials is likely to grow

      This "WHY" for industry is well stated. Employers are highly motivated.

    1. foster a sense of belonging and support for historically underrepresented students

      When applicants who are historically underrepresented students see themselves reflected in the current student population and observe a sense of belonging, this could lead to increased applications from certain groups. And increasing the applications should lead to increasing the admissions.

    2. outreach and recruitment programs can still target specific groups (e.g., via schools or districts that predominantly serve students of color), so long as they do not award admissions spots solely based on an individual student’s race

      Be intentional AND don't discriminate.

    1. Americans’ views of what a college education should be tend to prioritize specific, workplace-related skills and knowledge rather than general intellectual development and personal growth. Half of Americans say that the main purpose of college should be to teach specific skills and knowledge that can be used in the workplace, while 35% think its main purpose should be to help students grow and develop personally and intellectually and 13% volunteer that these objectives are equally important.

      The majority of people in the US believe workforce-relevant skills and knowledge should be a priority for college education. Regardless of whether faculty intentionally and overtly design learning to focus on these skills and knowledge, I believe that nearly all high quality offering in Higher Education implicitly include skills and knowledge with valuable transfer to the workplace. And Best Practices in digital credential design allow us to notice, name, and formally recognize though our credentials where they show up in our learning opportunities and when learners acquire them.

    2. This survey finds that one-third of Americans who lack a four-year college degree report that they have declined to apply for a job they felt they were qualified for, because that job required a bachelor’s degree.

      They may have the skills required but lack the proxy for those skills

    1. At BYU-Pathway Worldwide, this approach has been associated with a 20% increase in student retention (Marcus, 2020). These examples demonstrate the positive impact of earning a certification or certification on persistence, retention and graduation rates for learners in baccalaureate programs.
    2. One study examining short-term credentials embedded in associate degree programs found that these short-term credentials had positive impacts on retention and degree completion

      Although there are equity concerns that are essential to consider, the Student Success piece is a compelling element to consider: In addition to supporting learners' needs for acquiring skills and providing them with credentials to communicate about their skills, the possibility of credentials supporting completion and attainment could be a valuable consideration in program design.

  11. Jul 2023
    1. SHRM Foundation, in partnership with Walmart, aims to acceleratethe movement to demonstrate the value of nondegree credentialsto identify skills and talents in the workforce. Upon first releasing thisresearch report with the term “alternative credentials,” we discoveredthat the word “alternative” may suggest that employers considercandidates with these credentials as a different, lesser option.We aim to challenge that thinking and declare these credentialsas imperative to the workforce.MAKING SKILLED CREDENTIALS WORK 2

      Nondegree vs "alternative"

    1. Such efforts to protect data privacy go beyond the abilities of the technology involved to also encompass the design process. Some Indigenous communities have created codes of use that people must follow to get access to community data. And most tech platforms created by or with an Indigenous community follow that group’s specific data principles. Āhau, for example, adheres to the Te Mana Raraunga principles of Māori data sovereignty. These include giving Māori communities authority over their information and acknowledging the relationships they have with it; recognizing the obligations that come with managing data; ensuring information is used for the collective benefit of communities; practicing reciprocity in terms of respect and consent; and exercising guardianship when accessing and using data. Meanwhile Our Data Indigenous is committed to the First Nations principles of ownership, control, access and possession (OCAP). “First Nations communities are setting their own agenda in terms of what kinds of information they want to collect,” especially around health and well-being, economic development, and cultural and language revitalization, among others, Lorenz says. “Even when giving surveys, they’re practicing and honoring local protocols of community interaction.”

      Colonized groups such as these indigenous people have urgency to avoid colonization of their data and are doing something about it

  12. Jun 2023
    1. “Onde habilidades como criatividade, empatia e resiliência estão mencionadas no currículo do aluno?”, questiona Noah Geisel, professor e gerente do Programa de Microcredenciais da Universidade do Colorado Boulder, no primeiro painel do evento virtual  ‘O admirável futuro da educação superior’, promovido pelo Semesp, que acontecerá até sexta-feira, dia 28.
    1. Northeastern University for its new primer on microcredentials written specifically for higher-ed leaders
    2. colleges will also have to invest in a major effort to “convince graduates that part of paying it forward is to respond to surveys aimed at determining what worked for them.”
    3. whether microcredentials have been validated or endorsed by a trusted third party; whether they include an experiential or work-based component; and/or whether they map to in-demand skills in a given industry. As I see it, if that’s what employers will be looking for from microcredentials, that’s probably what colleges ought to be putting into them

      How to balance HE mission with employer practices? Can we hold that both "our role is to enlighten minds" and "our credentials are meaningfully aligned with employer-speak to help position our learners as job seekers" are valid and complimentary? Or does the latter undermine the former?

    4. check out the companion primer for human-resources or talent officials, which provides advice for evaluating the microcredentials that job applicants might present

      link to Northeastern report

    5. microcredentials need not be an alternative to college, but rather as a way to introduce or augment existing academic programs

      Degrees are NOT dead. This will very possibly increase the value of degrees.

    6. gauge the value of the microcredentials they offer, a step I suspect many have not yet been brave enough to take. That calls for tracking how often learners claim their awarded microcredential and share it to a professional networking site like LinkedIn, and for collecting feedback on why they did or didn’t. Another suggestion from the primer: track the number of microcredential learners who go on to enroll in a degree program

      Interesting data to collect. Relates to the Equity report from Credential Engine: https://credentialengine.org/credential-transparency/equity/

    1. Approximately one-third of employers consider badges during the application process and there are several reasons why.

      On the job seeker side: “LinkedIn reports that more than 44% of users added certificates to their profiles in the last two years.”

      And on the hiring side, two of the reasons offered for why 1/3 of employers consider digital credentials during the application process: “First, many employers are more interested in the skills job candidates have acquired rather than the coursework they have completed.

      Second, considering badges during the interview process allows organizations to assess candidates from a wider range of backgrounds, not just those who have earned a traditional bachelor’s degree. Emphasizing the value of skills and broadening the types of credentials that are accepted (including badges) can help organizations build more inclusive workplaces.”

    1. Makes the case for why trusted skills assertions can be the future of better connecting talented humans with opportunities they deserve

      SHRM research

    1. to publish clear, reliable,and verifiable data

      This is a competitive for Higher Ed. Reliable and verifiable data that consumers trust.

    2. The full value of credentials (e.g., labor market value,interest alignment, range of occupations to which thecredential can lead, stackability and transfer options, etc.

      Value is not solely about $

    3. As data practices become intentionally anchored in equity,there must be a willingness to hold entities accountableto make adjustments if data trends show consistentshortcomings and unintended consequences. Equitabledata practices cannot be maintained without clear guidingprinciples and the identification of critical data points.Such principles allow for appropriate and effective use ofthese data to support students’ discovery and successfulnavigation of pathways and transfer to achieve optimal andequitable outcomes.

      Equitable data practices are about humans achieving optimal and equitable outcomes.

    4. TRANSFER AND CREDIT MOBILITY

      Learner mobility depends on learning record mobility.

    5. SECURE, DIGITALSTUDENT RECORDS

      Access to student records is an equity issue. It's now been said. Out loud. Regardless of how essential that revenue is, maintaining barriers to accessing student records amounts to institutional efforts to perpetuate inequities.

    6. EARNINGS INFORMATION

      There is a difference between reporting on earnings information and using earning information to declare credential quality.

    7. SUPPORTS

      Including student support data in transparent credential metadata. Wow.

    8. Finally, those entities purchasing and using such tools,services, platforms and resources, such as schools,education systems and districts, city, county and stateagencies, colleges and universities, workforce boards,and community-based organizations, should include thefollowing principles as requirements or considerations intheir procurement, evaluation, and reevaluation processes

      including equity in high stakes decisions makes equity high stakes.

    9. We now have the capacity to ensurethat all possible pathways – andthe essential information about allthe providers, credentials, skills,assessments, quality indicators,outcome measures, transfer values,and links to job skills critical tounderstanding and building thosepathways – can be made fully open,transparent and interoperable sothat a new generation of tools tocustom pathways to meet everyone’sindividual need

      There is a lot in this little paragraph, and a big point to not miss is the call out of "individual need." There will be dashboards and other tools that purport to serve learners/earners with comprehensive data about the possible pathways that are open to their successful futures. A harmful that we can anticipate many falling into however, will be generalized data that fails to leverage "nearest neighbor" practices that provide users with data based on the outcomes experienced by people with shared characteristics to their own. For example, if a specific pathway has great outcomes that are disproportionately enjoyed by White males under 45 who already work in that industry, then the generalized data may be misleading to a career-changing Black woman in her early 60s who is investigating the next steps in her journey..

    1. Structural belonging refers to institutional conditions, policies, practices, and cultural norms that demonstrate that one is accepted, supported, respected, valued by, and important to a community. Fostering structural belonging, thus, requires dismantling and transforming inequitable institutional structures that devalue, dehumanize, disrespect and “other” minoritized students, especially those who are multiply marginalized.

      A welcome sign does not = belonging. At an institutional level, there is a responsibility to demonstrate the conditions necessary for people to trust that ours is a safe place to seek belonging.

    2. Thus, equity-minded campus leaders should make assertive efforts to center the voices and experiential knowledge of REM students in their assessment and transformation of institutional structures, policies, practices, and processes.

      Colleagues from non-majority backgrounds will bring background knowledge, experiences and insights to structures, policies, and practices that people like me never could.

  13. May 2023
    1. However, the graduation certificate is still paper-based and does not fit employers’ digitized recruitment processes. Digitizing the graduation certificate is overdue to align with the digitized processes of employers and universities. However, there is only a few research on that issue. This paper aims to conduct a systematic literature analysis. Therefore, we investigated 147 articles in the context of research on digital credentials.

      Consumption issue: the outgoing recognition is valued by the sender but not in a format that is appreciated by the receiver. The problem with putting highlights on a laser discs is that it requires someone to have a laser disc player.

    1. National Student Clearinghouse Research Center report documents an increase in learners with college credits but no credential and finds they are returning to college at lower rates than in the past.

      Highlights the importance of Learner Mobility

    1. It is also important to note that this positive evidence for low-income certificate-earners stands in con-trast to findings for other historically underserved groups; studies indicate that individuals of color and older individuals go on to stack credentials at lower rates and see smaller earnings gains relative to White individuals and younger individuals (Bohn and McConville, 2018; Bohn, Jackson and McConville, 2019; Daugherty et al., 2020; Daugherty and Anderson, 2021). Although we suspect many low-income individuals are also individuals of color, the findings suggest that there are inequities within stackable credential pipelines that might be more strongly tied to race, ethnicity, and age than to socioeconomic status. It is also possible that many low-income individuals never complete a first certificate and thus do not enter a stackable credential pathway

    2. Important note on Equity: The positive findings for credential-stacking among low-income individuals stand in contrast to findings for other historically underserved populations, such as older learners and individuals of color, which show some evidence indicating lower rates of stacking and lower returns from stacking relative to younger individuals and White individuals.

  14. Apr 2023
    1. For nearly half of the lower-wage employment analyzed, we identify at least one higher-paying occupation requiring similar skills in the same metro area. We also find that transitions to similar higher-paying occupations would represent an average annual increase in wages of nearly $15,000, or 49 percent.

      Recognition can change the world. Signals need to be valid and trustworthy, but we're so close to making a huge difference in the world through recognition of things that are already there, just hidden in plain sight.

    1. Complete Solo Teaching Requirement / Final which requires 10 hours of classes as solo instructor.

      "Complete" speaks to measurables that may not be transparently aligned with the competencies. This criteria statement however does specify that the completion means the earner has done 10 hours of solo instruction. That's helpful. Even better would be if those 10 solo classes were supported with assessment beyond just showing up. The alignment to external standards is also a model example.

    1. Proposed effective human resources initiatives based on workforce analytic

      Solid earning criteria. Linking to rubric or something measurable would be even better.

    1. Once the awarding and registration systems are in place, institutions should also integrate with a modern CRM solution to attract and manage student interest, support, and personalized communications to increase enrollment and engagement. The CRM needs to support career services and other experiential learning departments as the school looks to build outside relationships with organizations and industry partners to provide real-world learning experiences and assessment opportunities for students

      CRM focus that goes beyond the academic unit to include others. Also think about Alumni Affairs, Foundation, and lifelong learning.

    2. How are you going to maintain quality? Who will teach the program? Who will oversee it? How will you assess the success?

      Assessment questions

    3. And micro degrees or certificates give quick recognition of learning and skills achieved that are sometimes lacking in more traditional programs

      Not just the content. Also the narrative. Recognition is huge.

    1. Interoperable LERs support learners’mobility by functioning in local, regional,state, national, and global talentmarketplaces

      MOBILITY

    2. Interoperability: The ability of systems to worktogether, exchange, and make use of informationfrom other systems. In education, interoperability isthe ability of a system to exchange education andworkforce information with and use information fromother systems without special effort on the part of theuser. This means all individuals, including learners andemployers, have appropriate access to educationand workforce information, allowing them to makeinformed decisions in the workplace

      Interoperability is rooted in access and equity

    3. learners will seek to use their data to interact withemployment and education systems, including career navigation and job searches,that will allow them to continue to build skills and a career

      This is a huge concept to strive to embed in the narrative: a major reason WHY this is the right thing to do is that we can help implement systems that allow formal recognition of people's assets to function as tools that empower people in way that allow them increased agency in accessing their successful futures and economic mobility.

    4. LERs are reshaping not only what is recorded about alearner’s knowledge, skills, and capabilities, but also how learners can access and usetheir data to pursue employment and further education without barriers.

      Learners using accessing and using their data is the revolutionary piece here.

  15. Mar 2023
    1. “Our relationship with Community College of Aurora exemplifies the best in finding workforce solutions. Together we dug into the details to develop curriculum and training experiences that prepare students to meet the requirements for specific job responsibilities in behavioral health.”

      co-design with the employers who will consume credentials

    2. microcredentials create more affordable academic options that lead to economic mobility and high returns on investment for students
    3. only about a third of the need for mental health professionals in Colorado is currently met, driving demand for additional qualified behavioral health workers. By offering microcredential pathways in patient navigation, peer support specialist, behavioral health associate, and behavioral health+, these new credentials are designed to address Colorado’s mental health workforce shortage by preparing people for these roles in less than one year

      Market need + Short prep time for learners = meeting needs of job seekers and employers.

    4. whether built as credit-bearing or non-credit pathways, microcredentials are by no means a substitute for the intensiveness or comprehensiveness of traditional higher education pathways.

      Yes! It's a false dichotomy to pit MCs vs traditional credentials. They are different and can be complimentary.

    1. Powered by open standards and protocols, these components will work together tocreate a dynamic, machine-actionable alternative to existing resume and CV options

      Machine-readable is key.

    2. However, this only applies to newly issued records and does notaddress the vast amount of learner and worker experiences that already exist. Typicalemployment and continuing education artifacts like resumes and cover letters are commonlyused in traditional workflow processes but these exclude the vast amount of learning andemployment validation that will elevate and capture skills and experience to serve individualswho need this tool the most.

      Huge risk if LERs only serve new recognitions and fail to include existing recognitions simply bc they pre-date the technology. This will disproportionately harm historically underserved and marginalized people.

    1. If non-degree or alternative credentials were stackable, overhalf (56%) of respondents said this would increase theirorganization’s interest in non-degree or alternative credentials.Stackable credentials would greatly increase interest for 24%

      75% would have increased interest if the credentials are stackable. For a group that also claims to not know what these things really are, tough to know how much to read into this. On it's face, it's powerful encouragement for incremental credentialing.

    2. Respondents most often agree or strongly agree that non-degree or alternative credentials have helped their organizationfill existing skills gaps (74%) and that they are helping to improvethe quality of their workforce (73%)

      While data is kind of all over the place, this seems like a reliable response. Regardless of how well they understand non-degree credentials and how much meaning is mixed in other areas of the survey, it's straightforward that a super majority see MCs filling skills gaps and improving the quality of their workforce.

  16. Feb 2023
    1. Despite that the original St. Patrick’s Day was an effort to celebrate Irish culture, daily discrimination still wore on Irish communities. Moreover, Anglo American society pushed the Irish to assimilate into mainstream culture—in other words, to become more American than Irish. This assimilation occurred twofold: not only did Irish Americans suppress their own heritage, but many sought to turn the discrimination they faced against others, such as toward Black Americans and other immigrant groups. To escape oppression, they would oppress others

      Assimilation as a cycle: changing our own ways of doing in order to fit in doesn't just help us to "escape oppression" because part of fitting in means adopting ways of doing that include acting out oppression.

    2. St. Patrick’s Day is a holiday of rather nonlinear origins, as it developed gradually over time

      Pre-internet, pre-television, pre-telephone, and pre-radio, proliferation of cultural practices more closely resembled generational genetic adaptations than the viral spread we are used to witnessing with proliferation today. And because our practices are responses to the world around us, the changes in the world leads to changes in the practices. In the case of St. Patrick's Day, casual observation reveals that the meaning of the celebration has been a moving target for centuries, and that What we recognize, Why we recognize, and How we recognize have all been evolving and somewhat decentralized elements of cultural practice. (For example, recognition of discrimination endured by Irish-American immigrants figures prominently in today's practices even though the holiday was already hundreds of years old when the first of these people crossed the Atlantic.]

    1. Elevating and calculating the value of postsecondary credential completion to the individual will play a central role in the new plan

      "value" is a big concept. We certainly need to move toward serving (l)earners with more comprehensive and transparent data about the economic value of credentials. I believe it will be a miss to not also address more holistic value propositions that may also communicate important data to credentials seekers.

    1. More timely disaggregated data connected to workforce outcomes will enablemore effective interventions. Better data will also enable transparency for learnersabout what they can expect from an educational pathway—from the skills andcompetencies they will acquire to the career outcomes those competencies lead to

      Skills + competency data => transparent credentials

    2. Invest in academic and career advising

      This is so key. We know that quality advising is a big factor in predicting high quality outcomes. What we don't acknowledge and perhaps is not universally known is that advising is not adequately professionalized. In many settings advisor roles are entry-level; they offer low salaries and minimally invest in professional learning. They are often viewed as the "first foot in the door" at an institution that will allow people to then apply for other more desirable jobs as an internal candidate. The incentive structures all work against fostering ecosystems of advising that meet our learners' needs

    3. Expand the state’s credit for prior learning toolbox, with a particularfocus on industry credential-to-course credit

      Credential-to-Course Credit

  17. Jan 2023
    1. Produce a consumer information tool.States should get data about credentials into the hands of consumers and other stakeholdersin a format that is easy to understand. Consumer information tools ensure that individuals canunderstand the likely outcomes of a particular credential before enrolling.

      Equity! This is a consumer protection issue.

    2. Required: Transparent evidence of thecompetencies mastered by credential holders

      Clear, measurable criteria that is assessed

    3. Information about credentials should be valid, reliable,and transparent. Without sound, transparent informationindividuals and others do not know if credentials are en-abling individuals to achieve their goals

      Transparent Credentials

    1. Often, however, employers aren’t connected to—or even aware of—the worker-serving organizations in their community, and they are therefore unaware of the resources those organizations offer

      Ecosystem approaches are essential.

    2. use prescreening assessments (such as work samples) that are based on specific skills rather than credentials that may or may not reflect a candidate’s ability to perform the activities of the job.

      If employers move toward prescreening assessments, it stands to reason that certain trusted credentials will have the currency of being accepted in lieu of the assessments.

    3. Employers can first create a robust skills framework for all positions by defining the required skills rather than preferred competencies, changing norms to shift away use of credentials as a proxy for skills, and connecting with community organizations that provide workforce support to reach potential candidates.

      Be transparent in what is needed rather than mask with things that are wants, and avoid imperfect proxies for the skills that are needed.

    4. that having visible skills-based pathways is helpful in their work as they assist workers in their communities through interventions such as job coaching and career development

      Pathways aren't enough; people need Visible Pathways.

    5. participants cited sourcing, validating skills, and scaling skills-based practices across the organization as three of the most common challenges they faced when implementing a skills-based approach

      Sourcing and validating skills is a big challenge. This is why credential transparency may become an equity issue: In addition to equipping learners with essential knowledge and competencies, credentials have a responsibility to serve as trusted communication devices between employers and job seekers.

    6. Employers in the Accelerator program signaled their openness and excitement for creating these upward pathways for workers

      Universities can gain competitive advantages by proactively approaching employers to identify the employee populations for increased retention, understand workers' goals and needs, and co-design the learning and skills development components of the pathways.

    7. Hiring for skills is five times more predictive of job performance than hiring for education and more than two times more predictive than hiring for work experience.

      Citation is from 1984, so they need more recent data, but it still makes an important point.

    8. For example, a case study conducted by the alliance showed how a medium-sized healthcare provider created its own skills-based talent solution to address scarcity. The organization needed nursing assistants with the right skills and qualifications but weren’t getting the right applicants. They decided to train from the ground up, with two key changes: they removed role experience requirements from job postings, and they partnered with a local technical college to create an end-to-end clinical-training program. As a result, 200 new nursing assistants underwent this clinical training.

      One example of a crucial role Higher Ed institutions can play as co-designers.

  18. Dec 2022
    1. New to v3.0: In 2.0, an endorsement is its own type of assertion. In 3.0, an endorsement is its own type of credential.

      Does this mean that previously, endorsements were assertions contained within credentials, but that now they are new standalone credentials that are sort of digitally stapled onto the VC that has already been issued? Presumably this allows endorsements to be added to badges while ensuring no modifications have been made to the original credential?

    2. Once the students have successfully completed the course, Dr. Cara assesses each student's assignments and participation and selects which skills and competencies were met and at what level. The selection of skills and competencies triggers an issuing of a skill assertion for each one and includes the assessment results in the evidence and results.

      Skills assertions and the importance of evidence to enhance trust

    3. A Skill Assertion is an AchievementCredential asserting a subject holds an Achievement that is used by multiple issuers to recognize the same skill. The content of the Achievement, often with achievementType "Competency", is not specific to a learning opportunity or assessment offered by one specific provider only, but is designed to be generic to allow for assessment by any issuer. Verifiers of AchievementCredentials who are looking for a holder to demonstrate a specific Achievement SHOULD ensure that they trust the issuer of a credential to make this claim, because a credential may be considered valid as issued by any issuer, including self-issuance by the subject

      So, is an AchievementCredential the package (eg a badge)? Or is it an element contained within?

    4. In previous versions of Open Badges, the creator of an Achievement (known as a "BadgeClass") was the only entity that could issue it, but in v3.0, the door opens to many issuers recognizing the same achievement based on their own assessment. This practice of shared achievements enables skill assertions, where multiple issuers use a shared achievement definition to recognize achievement of a skill with each issuer doing their own assessment. In addition, further recording of related skills, competencies, standards, and other associations are enabled by the alignment of an Achievement

      Big deal: credentials with disparate names, from disparate issuers, nonetheless asserting a shared achievement definition. For example, competencies in my Spanish 4 class assert Intermediate-Low language proficiency, but a teacher whose class is more advanced than mine even though it's also called Spanish 4 could assert Intermediate-Mid proficiency while their Spanish 3 assertions is for Intermediate-Low.

    1. Economists explain that markets work bestwith “perfect information.” And visibilityfeeds this market by translating and sharingskills. But the price of transparency in themodern age is invaded privacy, as well as biasinherent in automated products and services
    2. DEGREES AS CREDENTIALSDON’T GO AWAY

      They are redefined as the skills that make up the degree, and learners can achieve mastery by other means. What does change is the emphasis on proficiency. Being able to demonstrate and validate skills proficiency will provide much more information to employers and (l)earners.

    3. same groups that are going to makethe scale happen can also perpetuate theinequities. We have to be asking the rightquestions with the right stakeholders toensure that we are not recreating anotherinequitable system that marginalizes thepeople we are trying to support

      Holly Custard of Strada

    4. Employer associations drive consistent skills languageacross job postings in their sectors
    5. L)earners can make themselves visible toemployers around the country and around theglobe by “opting in” to digital sector recruitingnetworks for internships, gigs, and full-time jobs

      What equity looks like

    6. Universally accepted assessments ordemonstration opportunities, particularlyfor softer skills, could help learners andworkers validate any type of skill withoutbeing told that they will have to “go backand get a degree” before being consideredfor professional track careers

      Universally accepted assessments can also add trust to college and university credentials. There is merit to the notion that higher ed institutions have a conflict of interest when it comes to serving as both learning provider and validator of that learning.

    7. Skills visibility is about making the skills a (l)earner hasacquired open, transparent, and accessible to the(l)earner, providing agency to showcase their curated skillsand competencies to employers in the marketplace
    8. Employers are investing in their own capacity andlooking for innovative partnerships to skill-up theirworkforce and diversify their talent pipelines.Companies like Microsoft and Google are trying tospeed up the pipeline by offering tens of thousands ofscholarships for their ready-made certificates inhard-to-fill roles. The World Economic Forum estimatesthat 50% of all employees will need to reskill by 2025

      There's urgency driving employer/industry efforts in this space. It's not simply trying to replace higher ed or signal lack of trust in higher ed or to go into competition with higher ed. While these things may all be in play, the reality is that the current make up of post-secondary education in the United States lacks the capacity to meet the coming needs.

    9. We are now tantalizingly close to a worldwhere my skills are telegraphed digitally to any employer around the nation,or even the world, looking for that skills cocktail. And it works the other way:all employers looking for certain skills can feed into a real-time skills tickertape, signaling to learners and the learning providers that serve them whatcombination of skills will yield employment
    10. Equity: When we close economic, resource, and opportunity gaps acrossthe learn-to-work ecosystem, and in turn, outcomes are not predictablebased on someone’s identities

      Context-specific definition of "equity"

    1. Glossary

      In particular, the "Trusted Issuer List"

    2. Making it easier to interpret the content of a credential to be an accurate description of anindividual’s skills, competencies and abilities will require significant investment in tools andprocesses for verification and validation. This might include open-source software libraries linkedto major semantic standards for display and verification of credentials, directories of such softwareand the creation of networks of validators who are able to validate different types of credentials

      Huge need that speaks both to Trust and Common Language.

    3. Studies/pilots which can prove that, e.g., hiring accuracy has improved thanks to data-richcredentials, hiring costs are decreased thanks to accepting such credentials or fraud andcompliance costs are reduced are not available to back up arguments promoting digitalcredentialing. This makes it difficult for management to quantify cost-savings or potential return oninvestment from adopting or demanding these tools

      Research opportunities

    4. Funders could use the ecosystem map to identify specific challenges. Technology companies coulduse it to decide which standards to integrate into their products (on both issuing and verificationsides). The map could also describe the progressive rollout of new types of credentials andcredential-linked services

      The WHY of a credentials ecosystem map

    5. Most panelists agree that HRMS/ATS, employers, credential-issuers and users do not sufficientlycollaborate with each other. Furthermore, no current grouping within any organization seems to beappropriate to nurture such cross-sectoral collaboration at the required level to bring about large-scale adoption in the short term

      What needs to happen to make sure we aren't still having same conversations in 5 years that we were already having 5 years ago.

    6. Credential criteria that should be included in quality standards:● Degree and granularity to which an organization documents student or employeelearning outcomes● Degree to which organizations provide users ownership of this data by issuing them asverifiable credentials● Degree to which issued credentials use standards that can be verified and validated byemployers and other actors

      Credential quality and assessment.

    7. Develop Credential Quality Guidelines and Processes

      Noteworthy that the recommendations for quality prioritize 1) The granularity of documenting learning outcomes; and 2) that credentials use standards that can be independently verified and validated.

    8. Standardization of these concepts would allow for validators to sift through credential wallets anddistinguish which credentials are most relevant in a specific use case. Critical to linking up such trustinformation is a more prominent role for dedicated trust providers in the credential ecosystem.These organizations include accreditation boards and regulators of professions, as well as otherssuch as ranking boards and private quality assurance agencies who publish quality standards foreducational organizations and maintain lists of which organizations match the criteria

      What constitutes TRUST?

    9. documentation of employees’experiences tends to be reduced to an employment history, letters of recommendations andreference checks—none of which typically contain much skill-related data

      Job titles/experiences are imperfect proxies for skills attainment/demonstration.

    10. while it is strongly in demand fromindustry, there is little evidence of employers prioritizing or issuing the detailed documentation ofon-the-job experiences that such hiring requires, even for their own currently employed staff

      Even those who want to do it aren't eating their own cereal by documenting existing workers' skills.

    11. credentials need to be enhanced with additional data aboutindividual courses/modules a person has studied, together with the learning outcomes(skills/knowledge) obtained in each of those modules and other documentation of ability.Credentials should also be used to connect to evidence of achievement such as architecturalportfolios or coding projects. Wherever possible, credentials should refer to occupational standardsor sectoral competence frameworks to increase the ability to interpret them in a specific context

      Transparency is an equity issue. Adding common language and richer data on skills and competencies to credentials means: * More data about courses/module * Learning outcomes from those modules * Connect to evidence of achievement * Refer to occupational standards/competency frameworks

    1. How can skills data be used to inform and enable micro credentialing 11 views 2 hours ago

      Webinar on youtube. Added time-stamped annotations in the comments.

    1. that envisions credential transparency and open data as tools to  unlock the learn-and-earn ecosystem nationwide and help every learner make more informed decisions about the credentials they might pursue

      WHY this stuff matters. It's a responsibility to our learners (eg consumers)