酒桌上，一直玩手机的聚会，就这一次，没有下次，没意义的社交，无需留恋！

二、超出领导预期 集团新建一个新零售的事业部，随着业务的发展，公司外招入一位财务主管。但不到1个月，领导决定让新来的主管离职，让当时还是出纳的我负责该主管的工作。 看到这里，大家是不是有些疑惑？是不是想知道我在背后干了什么“坏事”？除了我在公司一向优秀的表现外，当时确实做了一件让财务总监惊讶的事。 线下门店要进行存货盘点，我并不负责新零售的项目，但财务部的同事全部要参与通宵盘点。爱思考总结的我，趁着空闲的时间，把门店盘点的操作指引整理成文档，发送给总监，经总监许可，再分享到群里，让盘点的同事注意。

涛哥，问个问题：嫉妒心怎么破？​回答：​用获利思维去破啊，我嫉妒你，我就一直薅你，慢慢的我会感觉很获利，我巴不得你再强一些， ​怕理解的没那么透彻，我展开讲讲场景，比如乔丹挡住了皮蓬的光辉，但是不妨碍皮蓬是个伟大的球员，嫉妒乔丹么，那个时代谁都嫉妒，还有其他几种， ​第一种，嫉妒利益共同体，比如爱人，朋友，同事，他们的优秀像一个太阳，遮住了你的光芒，好，这时候你用获利思维想想，你们的利益是一致的，他们的优秀让共同利益干到了100，如果他们很辣鸡，那么可能共同利益只能到70，也就是说，他们越优秀，你就是既得利益者，反之，则你的利益也受到了侵害， ​但，多年的咨询案例，还有一种情况，就是他已经魔障了，宁愿摆烂，也要做主导者，这种情况挺多哦，就挺糟，这就是他的问题，人的问题，不是事的问题了， ​记住，人的综合成就大概率是他最亲密的5个人的平均值， ​​

38、亦仁说过，人人都应该有自己的小圈子。这个小圈子可以称之为自己的智囊团，里面的成员是愿意把“猪肉”分出来给大家的。现在应该是一个抱团取暖的时代。一个人可以走得更快，但一群人可以走得更远。

30、影响力是一种稀缺而宝贵的资源。做一个思想家，只要不断的拔高自己，输出自己的思想，其他也不用做什么就能有很大的收获了。现在是表达者的红利时代

29、出了社会会经历各种毒打，但是如果你抱着大腿，就会少走很多弯路。所以去外面工作为人一定要机灵，在公司里勤快一点，和同事的关系处好，多请教前辈，多请正确的人吃饭，吃饭花不了多少钱的，但是吃饭能收获很多东西。

27、中国是一个人情社会，所以维护人际关系是一个非常重要的学问。平时的送礼，节假日的问候，过年的红包祝福，这些都不可少，送出去的礼物一定要高配，选这个品类里面最好的那款。

25、给拜访的人带伴手礼是一种礼貌。礼品不需要太贵，但是一定要选好看实用的。平时多看看小米有品，在200块钱以内就能选到很好的小礼品了。这里给个参考：小蓝牙音箱。

我发现一个总被别人说好的人往往并不是个成功者，因为一个真正达成目标的人，真正获得幸福的人，甚至真正拥有满足的人，在这个社会中极少出现。由此看来，有关自己一生的问题，真需要交由社会大众去决定吗？

we believe that today’s environment is an ideal launching ground for the next group of billion-dollar consumer companies: vertical social networks. Ten years ago, it seemed impossible for a gaming-only network to be worth a billion dollars — now, we have two! (Twitch and Discord).

“Communities and dedicated spaces for people to talk about what’s happening will be at the forefront,” he told Co.Design in late 2020. “These community spaces will be safe and have a multitude of controls. Successful social media services will be those where people feel safe, comfortable, heard, and connected within their communities.”

Nextdoor’s feed-ranking algorithm feels less aggressively optimized than those of larger networks. There’s no such thing as “followers,” so there’s little incentive for users to post clickbait or engagement bait. The network’s intimate scope, with each user identified by their real first name, last initial, and neighborhood of residence, can make using Nextdoor feel less like a game of influence and more like, well, actually talking to your neighbors. It’s hard to go viral when your audience is limited to your immediate area.

Nextdoor has gradually evolved into something bigger and more consequential than just a digital bulletin board: In many communities, the platform has begun to step into roles once filled by America’s local newspapers. “Anecdotally, Nextdoor has gone from being kind of sub-Facebook to actually being the main platform you hear people discussing as a vector for local news and events and discussions,” says Emily Bell, director of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University.

Anyone who is serious about mitigating the damage done to humankind by the social web should, of course, consider quitting Facebook and Instagram and Twitter and any other algorithmically distorted informational environments that manipulate people. But we need to adopt a broader view of what it will take to fix the brokenness of the social web. That will require challenging the logic of today’s platforms—and first and foremost challenging the very concept of megascale as a way that humans gather. If megascale is what gives Facebook its power, and what makes it dangerous, collective action against the web as it is today is necessary for change. The web’s existing logic tells us that social platforms are free in exchange for a feast of user data; that major networks are necessarily global and centralized; that moderators make the rules. None of that need be the case. We need people who dismantle these notions by building alternatives. And we need enough people to care about these other alternatives to break the spell of venture capital and mass attention that fuels megascale and creates fatalism about the web as it is now.