12 Matching Annotations
1. Dec 2020
2. stats.libretexts.org stats.libretexts.org
1. The following ANOVA table illustrates the relationship between the sums of squares for each component and the resulting F-statistic for testing the three null and alternative hypotheses for a two-way ANOVA.

The following ANOVA table illustrates the relationship between the sums of squares for each component and the resulting F-statistic for testing the three null and alternative hypotheses for a two-way ANOVA.

#### URL

3. Nov 2020
4. mycsun.app.box.com mycsun.app.box.com
1. Repeated Measures ANOVA example.

#### URL

5. statistics.laerd.com statistics.laerd.com
1. You will want to report this as follows:

Reporting ANOVA in APA style.

#### URL

6. Oct 2020
7. www.scribbr.com www.scribbr.com
1. Example: Reporting the results of ANOVA

Example: Reporting the results of ANOVA

#### URL

8. statistics.laerd.com statistics.laerd.com
1. Underlying Assumptions: Normality

Repeated measures anova normality and sphericity

#### URL

9. Apr 2020
10. online.stat.psu.edu online.stat.psu.edu
1. Graphically, interactions can be seen as non-parallel lines connecting means when we are working with the simple two-factor factorial with 2 levels of each main effect (adapted from Zar, H. Biostatistical Analysis, 5th Ed., 1999). Remember interactions are referring to the failure of a response variable to one factor to be the same at different levels of another factor. So when lines are parallel the response is the same. In the plots below you will see parallel lines as a consistent feature in all of the plots with no interaction. In plots depicting interactions, you notice that the lines cross (or would cross if the lines kept going).

Main and interaction effects - graphs

#### URL

11. statistics.laerd.com statistics.laerd.com
1. Step #3b

Mix anova when no interaction effect is found.

2. Step #3a:

Mix Anova interpretation step 3a

#### URL

12. May 2019
13. stats.stackexchange.com stats.stackexchange.com
1. Multiple comparisons: It is not good practice to test for significant differences among pairs of group means unless the ANOVA suggests some such differences exist. Nevertheless, I admit it is tempting to take another look at the comparison of G1 with G3 (ignoring the existence of G2 and perhaps assuming normality), but then you should use a Welch t test to account for the differences in sample variances, and you should not make claims about the result unless the P-value is as low as .01 or .02. Looking at that difference more carefully might prompt a subsequent experiment.

Test for significance among pairs when the overall f test is not significant.

#### URL

14. Apr 2019
15. statistics.laerd.com statistics.laerd.com
1. ANOVA Table

#### URL

16. statistics.laerd.com statistics.laerd.com
1. There are two tests that you can run that are applicable when the assumption of homogeneity of variances has been violated: (1) Welch or (2) Brown and Forsythe test. Alternatively, you could run a Kruskal-Wallis H Test. For most situations it has been shown that the Welch test is best. Both the Welch and Brown and Forsythe tests are available in SPSS Statistics (see our One-way ANOVA using SPSS Statistics guide).

ANOVA is robust against violation of the assumption of equal variances, but...

2. However, platykurtosis can have a profound effect when your group sizes are small. This leaves you with two options: (1) transform your data using various algorithms so that the shape of your distributions become normally distributed or (2) choose the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis H Test which does not require the assumption of normality.

ANOVA is robust against violation of normality, but...