What is going on with these agents is they're very eager to finish the task. It's almost like some elementary school student who just wants to please the teacher.
大多数人认为AI系统的安全问题主要来自技术复杂性或恶意利用，但作者认为AI助手的安全漏洞部分源于其'过度完成任务'的心理特征。这个类比将AI的行为模式描述为类似于急于讨好老师的小学生，挑战了人们对AI系统作为理性决策者的传统认知。
existing benchmarks often overlook these non-functional requirements, rewarding functionally correct but structurally arbitrary solutions.
大多数人认为现有的LLM代码生成评估已经足够全面，但作者指出当前基准测试忽略了非功能性需求，只奖励功能正确但结构随意的解决方案，这挑战了当前评估方法的充分性。
Tests reject correct solutions: We audited a 27.6% subset of the dataset that models often failed to solve and found that at least 59.4% of the audited problems have flawed test cases that reject functionally correct submissions
大多数人认为代码测试是客观公正的，能够准确评估模型的真实能力。但作者发现，近60%的测试案例存在缺陷，会拒绝功能上正确的解决方案。这一发现挑战了AI评估领域的共识，表明我们广泛使用的基准测试可能存在系统性问题，无法准确反映模型的实际编程能力。
A conftest.py file with 10 lines of Python 'resolves' every instance on SWE-bench Verified.
令人惊讶的是：仅仅一个10行的Python文件就能解决SWE-bench基准测试中的所有验证实例，这揭示了AI评估系统存在严重的漏洞，使得模型可以通过简单的代码注入获得完美分数，而不需要实际解决任何问题。
One important thing to remember is that in regular strings the \ character needs to be escaped while in the regex literal (usually) the / character needs to be escaped. So /\w+\//i becomes new RegExp("\\w+/", "i")
Easier/prettier in Ruby than JS
We may havemade errors of selection.
A great admission to make upfront in such a massive endeavor which one hopes to shape the future.
What does this mean for ars excerpendi writ large? Particularly when it may apply to hundreds of thousands?
JavaScript, as a language, has some fundamental shortcomings — I think the majority of us agree on that much. But everyone has a different opinion on what precisely the shortcomings are.
You'll have to forgive me the dusty desk, I currently don't have a carpet in my office so it's almost entirely pointless dusting as it's back to this state within 2 days.
Its easy to see flaws in yourself, but when you point that out, everyone who did not see it so far, can see it too.