42 Matching Annotations
  1. May 2020
    1. What’s missing for learners outside formal institutions who know how to use social media is useful lore about how people learn together without a teacher.

      Yeah lore and stories help us understand the idea and transmit at mass level

  2. Apr 2020
  3. Nov 2019
    1. What learning activity recipes or models might be appropriate?

      This section is about asking questions about the texts, and one of these questions is the above one, about learning activities. For a reading group it's often hard to see what activities actually take place. People can appear to be passive recipients for instance, but maybe they do use certain insights in other contexts, which is fine of course. It's hard to impose learning activities, most people simply don't have the time for that - maybe it's a better idea to ask the participants how they would apply certain insights and maybe offer help, making it more learner-centered.

    1. More and more I think it would be useful to publish various versions of the Handbook, a version for teachers, for trainers in the corporate world, for people wanting to engage into peer-to-peer learning outside of institutions or companies...

      This being said, the content of this section can very easily be adapted to various use cases, it's just a matter of indicating that these patterns are not 'just for teachers'.

  4. Oct 2019
    1. 5PH1NX: 5tudent Peer Heuristic for 1Nformation Xchange - we think of it as a “curiously trans-media” use case in peeragogical assessment.

      I'm not sure whether the beginning of the book is the right place for this. First of all, 5PH1NX is a horrible name - maybe people in edu institutions are used to this kind of naming, but others run away screaming. Second, this is about educational institutions. Peeragogy however is about society at large, including people who left school long ago and want to work with others in order to learn, independently from institutions.

    1. You can jot some keywords here:

      it reminds me of open source, with all the possibilities but also the hurdles, especially for non-technical people. (Once you're invited to collaborate on GitHub working with Markdown, there's already one big hurdle to take.)

    1. All of the faculty and grad students at Berkeley dropped out of the project

      why would that have been? Maybe it wasn't useful in terms of 'credits'? Or do the 'powers that be' consider peer-to-peer learning as a threat to the academic business model?

  5. Mar 2019
  6. Apr 2018
  7. May 2017
    1. We will do this by investing time and energy, rather than money, building a distributed community of peer learners, and a strongly vetted collection of best practices. Our project complements others’ work on sites like Wikiversity and P2PU, but with an applied flavor. It is somewhat similar to Y Combinator and other start-up accelerators or incubators, but we’re doing it the commons based peer production way.

      Talked about this at the May 28 Peeragogy in Action session.

  8. Jul 2016
    1. Latest comments from across the site require a login to read. Not sure why you would want to do that. Be nice to just have a peek easily. The Amazon copy is V2. PDF is V3. Paperback is V3? (It does not say when you click on the link.)

  9. Feb 2016
  10. Jan 2016
  11. Dec 2015
  12. Nov 2015
  13. Aug 2015
    1. We want to kick things off with a candid confession: we’re not going to pretend that this book is perfect.

      I'm interested in understanding how hypothes.is handles changing content. I made a comment on an earlier version of this page, and the text I highlighted no longer exists. But what happens if the text only moves around? ... OK, here's the technical description: https://hypothes.is/blog/fuzzy-anchoring/

      Interesting. I might like to be able to see a pool of "orphaned" annotations, like the one I made before, which don't reattach anywhere. But current behavior is certainly OK for now!

  14. Jul 2015