25 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2017
    1. “an unprincipled tax plan that will result in cuts for the 1%, conflicts for the president, crippling debt for America and crumbs for the working people.”

      Is this just Wyden, or is this party line? How many Democrats would echo this statement?

    2. Democrats who oppose heavy tax breaks for high earners and corporate interests, Republicans who worry about the deficit, and lobbying interests concerned with the potential loss of favored deductions.

      Do this statement and the quotes that follow accurately and comprehensively represent the range of responses?

    3. In an attempt to simplify, the plan would eliminate most deductions used by higher earners, but would preserve those for charitable giving and home loans, among the costliest and most popular. It would also double the standard deduction, meaning married couples would not pay taxes on their first $24,000 in income

      There has been a long list of items eliminated or preserved. To what extent does it just reproduce the outline? What has been left out of this representation?

    4. income requirements pegged to new tax brackets, any explanation of a new tax break for childcare expenses, or any analysis of how much it would increase the national debt

      How did they choose what was missing?

  2. Jan 2017
    1. He explained millennials grew up in an environment where 'every child wins a prize' only to find the 'real world' after school is much different.

      Do the first several sentences cover all the basic facts of the story: Who, what, when, where, why, how. How are the first several sentences attempting to manipulate the reader?