- Oct 2022
-
forums.zotero.org forums.zotero.org
-
Put it in the Extra field like this:original-date: 1864
https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/63774/original-dates-of-publication
To include the original date of publication in a reference from within Zotero, add the following to the 'Extra field':
original-date: YYYY
-
- Sep 2022
-
-
More important is the fact that recently some publishershave started to publish suitable publications not as solid books, but as file card collections.An example would be the Deutscher Karteiverlag [German File Card Publishing Company]from Berlin, which published a “Kartei der praktischen Medizin” [File Card of PracticalMedicine], published unter the co-authorship of doctors like R.F. Weiß, 1st edition (1930ff.).Not to be forgotten here is also: Schuster, Curt: Iconum Botanicarum Index, 1st edition,Dresden: Heinrich 1926
As many people used slip boxes in 1930s Germany, publishers sold texts, not as typical books, but as file card collections!
Link to: Suggestion that Scott Scheper publish his book on zettelkasten as a zettelkasten.
-
- Aug 2022
-
www.washingtonpost.com www.washingtonpost.com
-
Mehdi Hasan to share tips on “How to Win Every Argument.” (2021, December 2). Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/mehdi-hasan-to-share-tips-on-how-to-win-every-argument/2021/12/02/e15f658a-5374-11ec-83d2-d9dab0e23b7e_story.html
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Jul 2022
-
-
Famously, Luswig Wittgenstein organized his thoughts this way. Also famously, he never completed his 'big book' - almost all of his books (On Certainty, Philosophical Investigations, Zettel, etc.) were compiled by his students in the years after his death.
I've not looked directly at Wittgenstein's note collection before, but it could be an interesting historical example.
Might be worth collecting examples of what has happened to note collections after author's lives. Some obviously have been influential in scholarship, but generally they're subsumed by the broader category of a person's "papers" which are often archived at libraries, museums, and other institutions.
Examples: - Vincentius Placcius' collection used by his students - Niklas Luhmann's zettelkasten which is being heavily studied by Johannes F.K. Schmidt - Mortimer J. Adler - was his kept? where is it stored?
Posthumously published note card collections - Ludwig Wittgenstein - Walter Benjamin's Arcades Project - Ronald Reagan's collection at his presidential library, though it is more of an commonplace book collection of quotes which was later published - Roland Barthes' Mourning Diary - Vladimir Nabokov's The Original of Laura - others...
Just as note collections serve an autobiographical function, perhaps they may also serve as an intellectual autobiographical function? Wittgenstein never managed to complete his 'big book', but in some sense, doesn't his collection of note cards serve this function for those willing to explore it all?
I'd previously suggested that Scott P. Scheper publish not only his book on note taking, but to actually publish his note cards as a stand-alone zettelkasten example to go with them. What if this sort of publishing practice were more commonplace? The modern day equivalent is more likely a person's blog or their wiki. Not enough people are publicly publishing their notes to see what this practice might look like for future generations.
-
- Apr 2022
-
www.defenseurdesdroits.fr www.defenseurdesdroits.fr
- Mar 2022
-
leorodriguez.tiddlyhost.com leorodriguez.tiddlyhost.com
-
youtube
YouTube constituyó una fuente de materiales audiovisuales que muchos maestros implementaron como recurso y forma de divulgación. Por otro lado, la plataforma TEAMS brindada por la SED permitió más opciones de trabajo desde sus funciones, sin embargo, es una plataforma muy pesada para cualquier dispositivo o computador y requiere de una banda ancha de internet lo que hizo fue dificultar el acceso pues meet, zoom ... son más sencillas, amables y menos pesadas. Se obligó a las instituciones a implementar Teams sin tener en cuenta las características y necesidades de la mayoría de los estudiantes de las instituciones públicas.
-
-
www.the-scientist.com www.the-scientist.com
-
Mullins, M. (2021, November 1). Opinion: The Problem with Preprints. The Scientist Magazine®. https://www.the-scientist.com/critic-at-large/opinion-the-problem-with-preprints-69309
-
- Jan 2022
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Singh Chawla, D. (2022). Massive open index of scholarly papers launches. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00138-y
-
- Nov 2021
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
COVID-19 Living Evidence. (2021, November 12). As of 12.11.2021, we have indexed 257,633 publications: 18,674 pre-prints 238,959 peer-reviewed publications Pre-prints: BioRxiv, MedRxiv Peer-reviewed: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO https://t.co/ytOhLG90Pi [Tweet]. @evidencelive. https://twitter.com/evidencelive/status/1459163720450519042
-
-
-
Kwiek, M. (2021). The Globalization of Science: The Increasing Power of Individual Scientists. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/gj4aq
-
- Oct 2021
-
fcpeantonyfbuisson.files.wordpress.com fcpeantonyfbuisson.files.wordpress.com
-
bel exemple de publication utile
-
-
www.fcpe.asso.fr www.fcpe.asso.fr
-
advances.sciencemag.org advances.sciencemag.org
-
Serra-Garcia, M., & Gneezy, U. (2021). Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones. Science Advances, 7(21), eabd1705. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd1705
-
- Sep 2021
-
Local file Local file
-
Accepted: 19 June 2020
I am guessing this is when it was actually published. It came out during the pandemic last year!
-
- Aug 2021
-
firstdraftnews.org firstdraftnews.org
-
Vaccine Misinformation Insights Report: June. (n.d.). First Draft. Retrieved 4 August 2021, from https://firstdraftnews.org:443/long-form-article/vaccine-misinformation-insights-report-june/
-
- Jul 2021
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Dr. Felix Schönbrodt on Twitter. (2020). Twitter. Retrieved 4 March 2021, from https://twitter.com/nicebread303/status/1325829196883636231
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
u/dawnlxh. (2021). Reviewing peer review: does the process need to change, and how?. r/BehSciAsk. Reddit
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Nicola Low #EveryDayCounts #StillFBPE on Twitter. (2020). Twitter. Retrieved 27 February 2021, from https://twitter.com/nicolamlow/status/1336958661151821825
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci on Twitter. (2020). Twitter. Retrieved 27 February 2021, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1339855911796543488
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Yesilada, M., Holford, D. L., Wulf, M., Hahn, U., Lewandowsky, S., Herzog, S., Radosevic, M., Stuchlý, E., Taylor, K., Ye, S., Saxena, G., & El-Halaby, G. (2021). Who, What, Where: Tracking the development of COVID-19 related PsyArXiv preprints. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/evmgs
-
-
-
Holmes, N. P. (2021). I critiqued my past papers on social media—Here’s what I learnt. Nature, 595(7867), 333–333. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01879-y
-
- Jun 2021
-
asapbio.org asapbio.org
-
linking from preprints to their journal version
We developed a preprint-publication linker that is available on github. Details here:
Cabanac, G., Oikonomidi, T., Boutron, I. (2021). Day-to-day discovery of preprint–publication links. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03900-7
We daily track 572 preprints of COVID19 randomized controlled trials for the COVID-NMA project. The results of the linking and validation of preprint-publication pairs by epidemiologists are available here:
https://www.irit.fr/~Guillaume.Cabanac/covid19-preprint-tracker
-
-
blogs.lse.ac.uk blogs.lse.ac.uk
-
we propose that the value of a well-run journal does not lie simply in providing publication technologies, but in the user community itself. Journals should be seen as a technology of social production and not as a communication technology.
Such a powerful shift.
-
- May 2021
-
blog.frontiersin.org blog.frontiersin.org
-
Early government intervention is key to reducing the spread of COVID-19. (2020, May 6). Science & Research News | Frontiers. https://blog.frontiersin.org/2020/05/06/early-government-intervention-is-key-to-reducing-the-spread-of-covid-19/
-
-
open.lnu.se open.lnu.se
-
Niemeyer, H., Aert, R. C. M. van, Schmid, S., Uelsmann, D., Knaevelsrud, C., & Schulte-Herbrueggen, O. (2020). Publication Bias in Meta-Analyses of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Interventions. Meta-Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.884
-
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
Scientific paper claiming smokers less likely to acquire Covid retracted over tobacco industry links. (2021, April 22). The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/apr/22/scientific-paper-claiming-smokers-less-likely-to-acquire-covid-retracted-over-tobacco-industry-links
-
-
dataforpolicy.org dataforpolicy.org
-
Special Track 3. (n.d.). Data for Policy CIC. Retrieved 8 March 2021, from https://dataforpolicy.org/data-fof-policy-2021/special-track-3/
-
-
twitter.com twitter.comTwitter1
-
COVID, One Year Ago on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved 1 May 2021, from https://twitter.com/covidoneyearago/status/1383888066671046657
-
- Apr 2021
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Pleskac, T. J., Kyung, E., Chapman, G. B., & Urminsky, O. (2021, April 23). Single- or double-blind review? A field study of system preference, reliability, bias, and validity. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q2tkw
-
-
leonidtiokhin.medium.com leonidtiokhin.medium.com
-
Tiokhin, L. (2021, April 21). Why indirect contributions matter for science and scientists. Medium. https://leonidtiokhin.medium.com/why-indirect-contributions-matter-for-science-and-scientists-6c9bf827bc7d
-
- Mar 2021
-
www.collabovid.org www.collabovid.org
-
Collabovid. (n.d.). Retrieved 6 March 2021, from https://www.collabovid.org/
-
- Feb 2021
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Lakens, D. (2019, November 18). The Value of Preregistration for Psychological Science: A Conceptual Analysis. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jbh4w
-
- Jan 2021
-
declaring-independence.org declaring-independence.org
-
SPARC (2020) We Declared Independence and so can you. Retrieved from https://declaring-independence.org/
-
-
-
The submitted manuscript is a privileged communication; reviewers must treat it as confidential. It should not be retained or copied. Also, reviewers must not share the manuscript with any colleagues without the explicit permission of the editor. Reviewers and editors must not make any personal or professional use of the data, arguments, or interpretations (other than those directly involved in its peer review) prior to publication unless they have the authors' specific permission or are writing an editorial or commentary to accompany the article.
Etika untuk Mitra Bestari
-
The reviewer should have identified and commented on major strengths and weaknesses of study design and methodology The reviewer should comment accurately and constructively upon the quality of the author's interpretation of the data, including acknowledgment of its limitations. The reviewer should comment on major strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript as a written communication, independent of the design, methodology, results, and interpretation of the study. The reviewer should comment on any ethical concerns raised by the study, or any possible evidence of low standards of scientific conduct. The reviewer should provide the author with useful suggestions for improvement of the manuscript. The reviewer's comments to the author should be constructive and professional The review should provide the editor the proper context and perspective to make a decision on acceptance (and/or revision) of the manuscript.
Poin-poin yang mejadi tolok ukur mitra bestari dalam melakukan review
-
to provide written assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of written research, with the aim of improving the reporting of research and identifying the most appropriate and highest quality material for the journal
Tujuan dari peninjauan sejawat (peer-review) adalah mengetahui kekuatan dan kelemahan naskah sehingga dapat dilakukan peningkatan mutu.
-
Authorship
semua orang yang berkontribusi secara substansial terhadap proses perencanaan, pengumpulan data, interpretasi hasil maupun penulisan dan merevisi naskah secara kritis dan menyetujui manuskrip versi akhir dan setuju untuk bertanggung jawab atas semua aspek pekerjaan. Setiap orang yang memenuhi kriteria pertama harus diizinkan berpartisipasi dalam penyusunan dan persetujuan manuskrip versi final (ICMJE 2017). Penulis pertama haruslah seseorang yang berkontribusi paling banyak.
https://www.ease.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/doi.10.20316.ESE_.2018.44.e1.in_.pdf
-
Animal experiments should require full compliance with local, national, ethical, and regulatory principles, and local licensing arrangements
Demikian juga dengan penggunaan hewan sebayak objek kajian, harus mengikuti standar etika yang berlaku (Helsinki).
-
Journals should have explicit policies as to whether these review board approvals must be documented by the authors, or simply attested to in their cover letter, and how they should be described in the manuscript itself
Seminimal mungkin, penulis harus menyampaikan keputusan etik dari komisi etik dan lebih ideal lagi jika menyertakan surat keputusan bebas etiknya.
-
For those investigators who do not have access to formal ethics review committees, the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki should be followed
Jika tidak memungkinkan untuk diperoleh hasil review etik, penulis seharusnya secara explisit menjelaskan apakah pelaksanaan kajian sesuai dengan Deklarasi Helsinki atau mereka memiliki pandangan lain.
-
Documented review and approval from a formally constituted review board (Institutional Review Board or Ethics committee) should be required for all studies involving people, medical records, and human tissues
Penulis harus menyertakan keterangan bebas review yang diterbitkan oleh komisi etik penelitian kesehatan.
-
Fabrication, falsification, concealment, deceptive reporting, or misrepresentation of data constitute scientific misconduct
Untuk mencapai kualitas terbaik pada ilmu pengetahuan yang diterbitkan, kajian harus terbebas dari permasalahan etika tersebut
-
- Dec 2020
-
twitter.com twitter.comTwitter1
-
Stuaert Rtchie [@StuartJRitchie] (2020) This encapsulates the problem nicely. Sure, there’s a paper. But actually read it & what do you find? p-values mostly juuuust under .05 (a red flag) and a sample size that’s FAR less than “25m”. If you think this is in any way compelling evidence, you’ve totally been sold a pup. Twitter. Retrieved from:https://twitter.com/StuartJRitchie/status/1305963050302877697
-
-
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
-
Lakens. D. Etz.. A. J. (2020) Too True to be Bad: When Sets of Studies With Significant and Nonsignificant Findings Are Probably True. Pubmed. Retrieved from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29276574/
-
-
hybridpedagogy.org hybridpedagogy.org
-
Following the model of open-source software, we can enter our ideas and expressions into public discourse
This also isn't a well-aligned argument. Articles published in a for-profit journal are entered into the public discourse (although obviously not into the public domain). Unless public means "without cost", which I don't think it does.
We might want to broaden this to include open-access, which is specific to publication models.
-
- Nov 2020
-
-
Soderberg, C. K., Errington, T., Schiavone, S. R., Bottesini, J. G., Thorn, F. S., Vazire, S., Esterling, K. M., & Nosek, B. A. (2020). Research Quality of Registered Reports Compared to the Traditional Publishing Model. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/7x9vy
-
- Oct 2020
-
-
Rubin, M. (2020, October 20). Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings?. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.16.4.p376
-
-
realrisk.wintoncentre.uk realrisk.wintoncentre.ukRealRisk1
-
https://realrisk.wintoncentre.uk/. Retrieved 16-10-2020
-
- Sep 2020
-
-
Nagaraj, A., Shears, E., & Vaan, M. de. (2020). Improving data access democratizes and diversifies science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(38), 23490–23498. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001682117
-
-
www.prognosisresearch.com www.prognosisresearch.com
-
Home. (n.d.). Prognosis Research. Retrieved September 24, 2020, from https://www.prognosisresearch.com/
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Daniël Lakens on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved September 23, 2020, from https://twitter.com/lakens/status/1308115862247952386
-
-
maxkasy.github.io maxkasy.github.io
-
Kasy, M. (2020). How to run an adaptive field experiment. Retrieved from https://maxkasy.github.io/home/files/slides/adaptive_field_slides_kasy.pdf
-
-
www.newscientist.com www.newscientist.com
-
Scientist, N. (n.d.). How to sniff out the good coronavirus studies from the bad. New Scientist. Retrieved July 1, 2020, from https://www.newscientist.com/article/2242835-how-to-sniff-out-the-good-coronavirus-studies-from-the-bad/
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
r/BehSciResearch—Inertia in academic priorities. (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved June 16, 2020, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciResearch/comments/h9cilq/inertia_in_academic_priorities/
-
-
us02web.zoom.us us02web.zoom.us
-
Welcome! You are invited to join a meeting: ASAPbio Community Call August 2020. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email about joining the meeting. (n.d.). Zoom Video. Retrieved September 2, 2020, from https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZMtc-ysqDIjGNUKrYAoTHYzYeLu9Jd8iP_V
-
- Aug 2020
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Mats—COVIDDash.org on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved August 29, 2020, from https://twitter.com/nuanceORDEATH/status/1279144399897866248
-
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Vuong, Q.-H. (2020). Reform retractions to make them more transparent. Nature, 582(7811), 149–149. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01694-x
-
-
featuredcontent.psychonomic.org featuredcontent.psychonomic.org
-
Hahn, U. (2020, May 20). Bringing together behavioural scientists for crisis knowledge management. Psychonomic Society Featured Content. https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/bringing-together-behavioural-scientists-for-crisis-knowledge-management/
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Mario Elia on Twitter: “While I commend them for this work, a few things jump out at me right away looking at the data tables. The sample of the patients was heavily skewed towards a few demographics. 1/” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved July 11, 2020, from https://twitter.com/supermarioelia/status/1280709931235184641
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
mike johansen on Twitter: “This paper has got some MAJOR problems. I don’t know why this paper was accepted for publication (nor submitted for publication to be frank). Let’s dive in. 1/” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved July 11, 2020, from https://twitter.com/mikejohansenmd/status/1280728008643555328
-
-
retractionwatch.com retractionwatch.com
-
Marcus, A. A. (2020, August 16). Hydroxychloroquine, push-scooters, and COVID-19: A journal gets stung, and swiftly retracts. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/2020/08/16/hydroxychloroquine-push-scooters-and-covid-19-a-journal-gets-stung-and-swiftly-retracts/
-
-
zika.ispm.unibe.ch zika.ispm.unibe.ch
-
Living Evidence on COVID-19. (n.d.). Retrieved August 24, 2020, from https://zika.ispm.unibe.ch/assets/data/pub/search_beta/
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Besançon, L., Peiffer-Smadja, N., Segalas, C., Jiang, H., Masuzzo, P., Smout, C., Deforet, M., & Leyrat, C. (2020). Open Science Saves Lives: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic. BioRxiv, 2020.08.13.249847. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.13.249847
-
-
www.latimes.com www.latimes.com
-
C. L., & Print. (2020, August 14). Op-Ed: We rely on science. Why is it letting us down when we need it most? Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-08-14/replication-crisis-science-cancer-memory-rewriting
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Paris, Marseille named as high-risk COVID zones, making curbs likelier. (2020, August 14). Reuters. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-france-idUKKCN25A0LC
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Michael Eisen on Twitter: “A core problem in science publishing today is that we have a system where the complex, multidimensional assessment of the rigor, validity, utility, audience and impact of a work that emerges from peer review gets reduced to a single overvalued ‘accept/reject’ decision.” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved August 10, 2020, from https://twitter.com/mbeisen/status/1291752487448276992
-
-
deviparikh.medium.com deviparikh.medium.com
-
Parikh, D. (2020, May 27). How we write rebuttals. Medium. https://medium.com/@deviparikh/how-we-write-rebuttals-dc84742fece1
-
-
journals.plos.org journals.plos.org
-
Fry, C. V., Cai, X., Zhang, Y., & Wagner, C. S. (2020). Consolidation in a crisis: Patterns of international collaboration in early COVID-19 research. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0236307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236307
-
-
unherd.com unherd.com
-
If a prominent magazine like The Lancet is publishing such rubbish, who is to say smaller and less well financed magazines aren’t doing the same on a langer scale?
-
-
www.fastcompany.com www.fastcompany.com
-
Taraborelli, D., Taraborelli, D., & Taraborelli, D. (2020, August 5). How the COVID-19 crisis has prompted a revolution in scientific publishing. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/90537072/how-the-covid-19-crisis-has-prompted-a-revolution-in-scientific-publishing
-
- Jul 2020
-
lwn.net lwn.net
-
"that text has been removed from the official version on the Apache site." This itself is also not good. If you post "official" records but then quietly edit them over time, I have no choice but to assume bad faith in all the records I'm shown by you. Why should I believe anything Apache board members claim was "minuted" but which in fact it turns out they might have just edited into their records days, weeks or years later? One of the things I particularly watch for in modern news media (where no physical artefact captures whatever "mistakes" are published as once happened with newspapers) is whether when they inevitably correct a mistake they _acknowledge_ that or they instead just silently change things.
-
-
osf.io osf.io
-
Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Tenzing: Documenting contributorship using CRediT [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b6ywe
-
-
-
Stathoulopoulos, K. (2020, March 17). Orion: An open-source tool for the science of science. Medium. https://medium.com/@kstathou/orion-an-open-source-tool-for-the-science-of-science-4259935f91d4
-
-
science.sciencemag.org science.sciencemag.org
-
Barton, C. M., Alberti, M., Ames, D., Atkinson, J.-A., Bales, J., Burke, E., Chen, M., Diallo, S. Y., Earn, D. J. D., Fath, B., Feng, Z., Gibbons, C., Hammond, R., Heffernan, J., Houser, H., Hovmand, P. S., Kopainsky, B., Mabry, P. L., Mair, C., … Tucker, G. (2020). Call for transparency of COVID-19 models. Science, 368(6490), 482.2-483. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb8637
-
-
www.psychologicalscience.org www.psychologicalscience.org
-
Collective Trauma and Stress Following Disasters: APS Journal Articles Publicly Available
Tags
- resource sharing
- lang:en
- trauma
- publication
- PTSD
- mental health
- impact
- stress
- research
- information sharing
- post-traumatic stress disorder
- COVID-19
- is:webpage
- understanding
- article
- disaster
Annotators
URL
psychologicalscience.org/news/collective-trauma-and-disaster-stress-research-publicly-available.html -
-
docs.google.com docs.google.com
-
COVID-19 Social Science Tracker - Google Sheets
Tags
- international
- lang:en
- preprint
- behavior
- is:other
- misinformation
- tracker
- social media
- analysis
- community
- publication
- social distancing
- unofficial
- mental health
- spreadsheet
- social norm
- infection
- isolation
- healthcare
- conspiracy theory
- social science
- research
- uncertainty
- medicine
- sheets
- COVID-19
- government
- data collection
- policy
Annotators
URL
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Nate Silver on Twitter: “It’s sort of interesting which COVID-19 studies get widespread media attention. Not very well correlated (in fact, perhaps negatively correlated) with the ones the subject-matter experts I follow seem to find compelling.” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1284918726379425800
-
-
covid-19.iza.org covid-19.iza.org
-
COVID-19 and the Labor Market. (n.d.). IZA – Institute of Labor Economics. Retrieved July 18, 2020, from https://covid-19.iza.org/publications/dp13500/
-
-
admin.nber.org admin.nber.org
-
Research Search Results for “Covid.” (n.d.). Retrieved July 18, 2020, from https://admin.nber.org/custom?q=Covid&restrict_papers=yes&client=test3_fe&proxystylesheet=test3_fe&site=default_collection&entqr=0&ud=1&output=xml_no_dtd&oe=UTF-8&ie=UTF-8&btnG=Search
-
-
-
Uribe-Tirado, A., del Rio, G., Raiher, S., & Ochoa Gutiérrez, J. (2020). Open Science since Covid-19: Open Access + Open Data [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/a5nqw
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Sasaki, K., & Yamada, Y. (2020). The pandemic threatens the Registered Reports system as well as human lives [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6wdaz
-
-
-
Perrott, D. (2020, May 22). Exploring the Valley’s of the Applied Behavioural Science Landscape. Medium. https://medium.com/@DavePerrott/exploring-the-valleys-of-the-applied-behavioural-science-landscape-a8b8ed53e58a
-
-
www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com
-
Fontana, M., Iori, M., Montobbio, F., & Sinatra, R. (2020). New and atypical combinations: An assessment of novelty and interdisciplinarity. Research Policy, 49(7), 104063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104063
-
-
www.apa.org www.apa.org
-
Call for Papers: Risk Perception, Communication, and Decision Making in the Time of COVID-19. (n.d.). Https://Www.Apa.Org. Retrieved July 1, 2020, from https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/xap/call-for-papers-covid-19
-
-
-
COVID-19: Relevant Calls for Papers from APA Journals. (n.d.). Https://Www.Apa.Org. Retrieved July 1, 2020, from https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/covid-19-calls-for-papers
-
- Jun 2020
-
www.the100.ci www.the100.ci
-
Mis-allocated scrutiny. (2020, June 24). The 100% CI. http://www.the100.ci/2020/06/24/mis-allocated-scrutiny/
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Minocher, R., Atmaca, S., Bavero, C., McElreath, R., & Beheim, B. (2020, June 24). Reproducibility of social learning research declines exponentially over 63 years of publication. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4nzc7
-
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Palayew, A., Norgaard, O., Safreed-Harmon, K. et al. Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge. Nat Hum Behav (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0911-0
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Maier, M., Bartoš, F., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis: Addressing Publication Bias with Model-Averaging [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u4cns
-
-
royalsociety.org royalsociety.org
-
DELVE group publishes evidence paper on the use of face masks in tackling Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic | Royal Society. (2020 May 04). https://royalsociety.org/news/2020/05/delve-group-publishes-evidence-paper-on-use-of-face-masks/
Tags
- lang:en
- SAGE
- behavioral change
- droplet
- evidence
- physical distancing
- publication
- social distancing
- infection
- transmission reduction
- Data Evaluation and Learning for Viral Epidemics
- face mask
- public health
- asymptomatic
- management
- Royal Society
- COVID-19
- is:webpage
- DELVE
- learning
- policy
Annotators
URL
-
-
oaspa.org oaspa.org
-
Scholarly publishers are working together to maximize efficiency during COVID-19 pandemic. (2020, April 27). OASPA. https://oaspa.org/scholarly-publishers-working-together-during-covid-19-pandemic/
-
-
scicomm.plos.org scicomm.plos.org
-
Tips on Using Science Twitter During COVID-19. (2020, April 15). PLOS SciComm. https://scicomm.plos.org/2020/04/15/tips-on-using-science-twitter-during-covid-19/
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
BehSciMeta repost. (2020, May 22). "Great piece by James Heathers on how preprints have turned into publicity vehicles and researchers are being irresponsible in not responding to criticism" Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciMeta/comments/go6lik/great_piece_by_james_heathers_on_how_preprints/
-
-
featuredcontent.psychonomic.org featuredcontent.psychonomic.org
-
Lindsay, D. S. (2020, May 29). Enhancing Peer Review of Scientific Reports. Psychonomic Society Featured Content. https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/enhancing-peer-review-of-scientific-reports/
-
-
featuredcontent.psychonomic.org featuredcontent.psychonomic.org
-
Holcombe, A. (2020, May 25). As new venues for peer review flower, will journals catch up? Psychonomic Society Featured Content. https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/as-new-venues-for-peer-review-flower-will-journals-catch-up/
-
-
-
Fung, D. J. (2018, April 10). The Corruption of Evidence Based Medicine—Killing for Profit. Medium. https://medium.com/@drjasonfung/the-corruption-of-evidence-based-medicine-killing-for-profit-41f2812b8704
-
-
www.aeaweb.org www.aeaweb.org
-
Ofosu, G. K., & Posner, D. N. (2020). Do Pre-analysis Plans Hamper Publication? AEA Papers and Proceedings, 110, 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201079
-
-
www.imperial.ac.uk www.imperial.ac.ukCOVID-191
-
COVID-19. (n.d.). Imperial College London. Retrieved June 14, 2020, from http://www.imperial.ac.uk/medicine/departments/school-public-health/infectious-disease-epidemiology/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/covid-19/
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved June 12, 2020, from https://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1271058689970114560
-