- Jun 2023
-
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
-
Why didn't university libraries take on the role of publishing and maintaining academic journals rather than ceding the function to major for-profit corporations which they now pay heavily to license that material back from?
-
- Apr 2022
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Daniël Lakens. (2020, October 28). This piece makes a great point about how we can try to make commentaries more useful for science—Turning them from ‘pointless quibbles’ into pieces where both parties actually commit to working out their disagreements. Https://t.co/fBKStzg7ib [Tweet]. @lakens. https://twitter.com/lakens/status/1321345954264633345
-
- Mar 2021
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(12), 1217–1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6
-
- Apr 2017
-
i4oc.org i4oc.org
-
The Initiative for Open Citations I4OC is a collaboration between scholarly publishers, researchers, and other interested parties to promote the unrestricted availability of scholarly citation data.
-
- Jul 2016
-
blogs.lse.ac.uk blogs.lse.ac.uk
-
SocArXiv - an upcoming open archive of papers in the social sciences modeled on arxiv.org.
-
- Jun 2016
-
arstechnica.com arstechnica.com
-
A history of open access academic publishing from the early 1990s to 2016.
-
- Apr 2016
-
governancexborders.com governancexborders.com
-
The few open access journals that managed to acquire substantial prestige such as some of Public Library of Science (PLoS) journals did so mostly because of the very high prestige of founding editors, including nobel laureates. It is also the reason why simply calling for researchers to switch to open access outlets won’t work. Since careers and funding depend on the proven ability to publish in established “top journals”, researchers in general and early-career researchers in particular have strong incentives to avoid newly founded open access outlets. But there are groups of people that could make a difference: journal editors and their editorial review boards. A huge part of a journal’s reputation is effectively derived from its editors. If the whole editorial board of a prestigious journal decided to collectivley leave this journal behind and open up a new one, it’s very likely that this new journal would outperform the journal they had left behind.
-
- Feb 2016
-
thecostofknowledge.com thecostofknowledge.com
-
Academic researchers protest Elsevier's business practices. 15,647 so far.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
bigthink.com bigthink.com
-
Scientists sharing knowledge! Naughty!
-
- Jan 2016
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Scott Johnson tweeted a screen-capture of a message he received from academia.edu.
Would you be open to paying a small fee to submit any upcoming papers to our board of editors to be considered for recommendation? You'd only be charged if your paper was recommended.
Academia.edu founder Richard Price replied.
-
- Dec 2015
-
custodians.online custodians.online
-
We find ourselves at a decisive moment. This is the time to recognize that the very existence of our massive knowledge commons is an act of collective civil disobedience. It is the time to emerge from hiding and put our names behind this act of resistance. You may feel isolated, but there are many of us. The anger, desperation and fear of losing our library infrastructures, voiced across the internet, tell us that. This is the time for us custodians, being dogs, humans or cyborgs, with our names, nicknames and pseudonyms, to raise our voices. Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the flowers - clean the volcanoes.
-
In Elsevier's case against Sci-Hub and Library Genesis, the judge said: "simply making copyrighted content available for free via a foreign website, disserves the public interest"
The copyrighted material in question is academic research, much of which is paid for by public funds. This judge is confusing "public" with "publishing companies". How much has the academic journal scam cost the public?
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Nov 2015
-
www.eventbrite.co.uk www.eventbrite.co.uk
-
With over 36 million visitors each month, the San Francisco-based platform-capitalist company Academia.edu is hugely popular with researchers. Its founder and CEO Richard Price maintains it is the ‘largest social-publishing network for scientists’, and ‘larger than all its competitors put together’. Yet posting on Academia.edu is far from being ethically and politically equivalent to using an institutional open access repository, which is how it is often understood by academics. Academia.edu’s financial rationale rests on the ability of the venture-capital-funded professional entrepreneurs who run it to monetize the data flows generated by researchers. Academia.edu can thus be seen to have a parasitical relationship to a public education system from which state funding is steadily being withdrawn.
Includes links to related articles.
-
- Jul 2015
-
dougbelshaw.com dougbelshaw.com
-
Is the only reason we persist with journals and their articles is because they provide a convenient means to weigh the pig?
-