- Sep 2019
-
www.mdpi.com www.mdpi.com
-
Original version (way better for me) of this paper:
Ineffective Obsessions in Brazilian Academia and Proposals Towards Meritocracy
-
- Apr 2019
-
www.go-fair.org www.go-fair.org
- Mar 2018
-
teresa-nextsteps.blogspot.com teresa-nextsteps.blogspot.com
-
Having found my voice in the academic community and a means to engage in the meaningful deployment of my abilities across institutional and national boundaries thanks to the open internet, I have made yet another career "modification" - one where I can pass on a new perspective to students considering teaching languages.
agency, voice research community
-
- Jul 2016
-
blogs.lse.ac.uk blogs.lse.ac.uk
-
SocArXiv - an upcoming open archive of papers in the social sciences modeled on arxiv.org.
-
-
journal.disruptivemedia.org.uk journal.disruptivemedia.org.uk
-
Hello. This is my first entry. Dario and I plan to create a podcast that has three elements:
1) A formal exploration of the podcast form using our own podcast as a case study. 2) A discussion around academic research and the podcast. 3) A discussion around the 'disruptive journal' featuring input from JMP contributors.
The aim is to construct a text that operates as a viable and valid piece of research and also is reflexive regarding the changing nature of academic research.
We will be talking in person late July following some leave and will be emailing disruptive JMP participants shortly to invite them to participate.
For now I listening to podcasts to prepare, and recommend the latest NPR Invisibilia episode on problem solving, and any episode of the brilliant Longford Podcast.
-
- Feb 2016
-
bigthink.com bigthink.com
-
Scientists sharing knowledge! Naughty!
-
- Dec 2015
-
opennessinitiative.org opennessinitiative.org
-
We believe that openness and transparency are core values of science. For a long time, technological obstacles existed preventing transparency from being the norm. With the advent of the internet, however, these obstacles have largely disappeared. The promise of open research can finally be realized, but this will require a cultural change in science. The power to create that change lies in the peer-review process.
We suggest that beginning January 1, 2017, reviewers make open practices a pre-condition for more comprehensive review. This is already in reviewers’ power; to drive the change, all that is needed is for reviewers to collectively agree that the time for change has come.
-