statsmodels developers provide a preferred citation for their code: http://www.statsmodels.org/stable/index.html#citation

Menarik kalau ada yang menghubungkan tingginya sitasi jumlah pendidikan teknik dengan jumlah mahasiswa atau dosen/peneliti di bidang ini. Apakah berhubungan atau tidak? Akan lebih menarik lagi kalau ada yang mencari tahu apakah sitasi tersebut berasal dari penulis Indonesia atau artikel yang terbit di jurnal dalam negeri (DN) atau dari penulis/artikel luar negeri (LN).

Ini akan menjadi menarik, ketika ada yang membantu mengevaluasi sitasi-sitasi tersebut, termasuk sitasi-pribadinya.

Salam dan terima kasih untuk Tim Penulis.

Secara umum artikel ini patut dihargai, karena penulis telah meluangkan waktu dan tenaga untuk menuangkan hasil penjaringan informasi sitasi dari Google Scholar (GS) dan Scopus yang telah diagregasi SINTA.

Artikel ini bersifat deskriptif, yang mana artikel jenis ini sering terlupakan, padahal fakta-fakta menarik akan muncul setelah data dan grafik terpampang rapih dalam bentuk artikel. Semoga artikel ini dapat menggugah banyak pendapat yang bersifat argumentatif yang kemudian dapat melahirkan artikel-artikel baru.

Perkenankan saya meninggalkan beberapa catatan untuk artikel ibu dan bapak ini.

E.P. "Herr Hausmann's Violoncello Recital" Musical standard; Apr 16, 1887; 32, 1185; British Periodicals pg. 245.

Starting in 2014-2015, AAS/IOP started linking to preprints in reference lists if they were the version cited by the author and an accepted manuscript did not at that time exist.

Thus we now have built in "categories" for references, which could be expanded to include data/software sections.

This is an example of incorrect software citation per the AAS Journal's policy. The Zenodo metadata should have been added to the reference list as a 1st class citation.

It is also an example of an incorrectly typeset URL. URLs that come from DOIs should be typeset using the DOI string not the resolved URL. It should have read, "version used in this paper has been archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.380469"

corner.py is one of the more interesting examples of software citations. there are at least 3 different formal references in the wild:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11020 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.53155 https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00024

with different versions and author lists.

This software citation losts its version information. We will have to work on our typsetting and production rules, as well as develop formal JATS/NLM XML schema to contain versioning information.

This DOI software archive is also in the Reference list per our Journal's software policy.

This is the dataset related to this article. It contains reproducibility and reusable data for readers.

Our "article data" tab is suppose to show this entry, but the article data tab is currently linked to the wrong DOI (the Zenodo one highlighted below).

We do not yet submit this type of data citation as CrossRef metadata. We are still discussing how data citations should appear and be acknowledged in the text.

The AASJournals now highlight software using a paragraph trailing the acknowledgements that lists all software used in the paper's analysis. The software doesn't need to be mentioned in the main text; context-free mentions can be placed here.

The format is a 2 item tuple containing the short/common name of the software, and a citation or URL for the software.

In principle this section could be data mined. At the moment it is just a free paragraph in the XML, but could be given more explicit markup to aide in data mining reuse and indexing.

This is an example of our current data linking markup. Data links are inline to the text through a parenthetical anchored link to the DOI resource.

There is a bug in the current version of the article. Our formal practice is to include this in the "Article Data" tab, which didn't happen this time. We will have to do some more work standardizing our production practices. We are also still thinking about how best to markup the anchored text.

We have not yet adopted a formal XML schema for including data links. We are working on this, which may be made easier when we adopt the most recent JATS schema.

It would be better to see some of these going to bibliographic references instead of URLs though many of them do not list preferred citations.

Barbuto Jr, J. E., & Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group & Organization Management, 31(3), 300-326.

Interesting idea to incorporate the interview content in three ways. Those who want to use it as an article can do so, and those who want the original source can still access it.

Easy to find citation. While I like the simple style, maybe go ahead and do a full citation?

For quotations, we can do better than pointing to containing documents. We can use annotations to point directly to quotes.

is this backed up by any sort of research? journal articles, stats etc.?

I believe the citation goes at the end of the sentence.

It would be great if software were cited according to the Software Citation Principles: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86 .

kudos for citing (rather than just mentioning) the dataset and especially for including the consent forms (they are in Study_protocol.docx)

interesting.

Why?

Quotation or example for ambiguous? HTML5 semantics have improved this a bit, but still for instance allows implicit paragraphs which complicates post-processing.

Which they clearly are not - there are a researcher at an elite institution will have a citation pattern more like another researcher at an elite institution, not like another researcher in the same field at a non-elite institution.

The data for this ALMA observation can be obtained at this dataset link: http://almascience.nrao.edu/aq/?project_code=2016.1.01293.S

The data for this ALMA observation can be obtained at this dataset link: http://almascience.nrao.edu/aq/?project_code=2015.1.00504.S

Mendeley is a great reference manager

Incorrect citation

Interesting process. I have tended to export all notes from one reference in a batch, and then organize them in DevonThink. In theory, this process is more efficient (I think) because I can process large numbers of notes in one go without constant app-switching. On the other hand, though, the method outlined is wonderfully direct: when you find information you need, you put it where you're going to need it.

Like so.

Key point with some useful pull quotes. It is the assymetry of the reference and citation and the decontextualisation that is at the core of mainly failures to develop useful theory. See also Leydesdorff on explanans vs explanadum

Track down citations that look interesting to you.

Note governmental agencies that compile data on the issue. Look for new data or current questions the data seeks to answer.

Look for government agencies that compile data on the issue. Visit the website to locate new data or current questions the data seeks to answer.

Record names of significant, thinkers, scholars, authors

Notice the organizations, scholars, or institutions that the article uses to supply evidence.

Try searching that site or organization for more up to date information.

For example

Page 219

Humanities scholars integrate and aggregate data from many sources. They need tools and services to analyze digital data, as others do the sciences and social sciences, but also tools that assist them interpretation and contemplation.

Page 215

Borgman discussing the half-life of citations and humanities :

while the half-life of literature is considered to be the longest in humanities, the large comparative study discussed earlier found the shortest citation age of an average article in humanities…. [another study] also found that the usage of history articles was much more concentrated in recent publications and was the usage of articles in economics or mathematics (the three fields studied). A close inspection revealed that the use of history articles was widely scattered across countries, without the clustering around classic articles from the other two fields. Although history can be considered within the humanities or the social sciences, comparisons between these findings do reinforce others conclusions that humanists’ may read current journal articles to keep up with their fields, but rely more heavily for their research on sources not covered by journal indexes. The findings also amplify concerns about the validity of citation studies of journal literature in humanities, given the reliance on monographic and archival sources. In sum, the humanities draw on the longest literature time span of any of the disciplines, and yet have the least amount of their scholarly literature online. So far, they are the discipline most poorly served by the publications component of the content later.

Page 214

Literature in the Humanities goes out-of-print long before it goes out of date, so efforts to make older, out-of-copyright books available greatly benefit these fields.

Page 214

Borgman notes that the bibliographic coverage of journal literature is shallow in the humanities. The ISI Arts and humanity citation Index only goes back to 1975. In Sciences it goes back to 1900. In the social sciences it goes back to 1956. Also SCOPUS does not include the humanities.

What is interesting about this is that the humanities are the least cumulative of all the disciplines in the sense that they do not build on previous knowledge so much as we examine previous thought.

Page 203

Citation age of an average article is longest in the social sciences.

Page 158

George Barnett, Edward think, and Mary Beth debus constructed a mathematical model of citation age to test this ordering using large data sets from each of the science citation index, social sciences citation index, and arts and humanities citation index published by the isi. In each of these three sets, the citation age of an average article reaches its peak in less than two years, with the Arts and Humanities peeking soonest parentheses 1.164 years close parentheses comma and the social sciences speaking latest parentheses 1.752 years close parentheses, contrary to expectations. The maximum proportion of citations did have the predicted ordering, with science the highest, and the Arts and Humanities the lowest. While the models presume that citation rates were stable over time a close examination of the data revealed that citation for article increase substantially over the time period of the study parentheses in science, from 12.14 per article in 1961 to 16 in 1986 God semi colon in the social sciences, from 7.07 in 1970 to 15.6 in 1986 semi colon no Citation for article data were given for the Arts and Humanities close parentheses.

Page 158

Half-Life studies are used to identify temporal variations in the use of literature by discipline most such studies indicate that the humanities have the longest citation half life and the Sciences the shortest with the social sciences in between. In other words, scientific articles reference the most recent Publications and Humanities articles the least recent ones.

Pages 36 and 37

Boardman discusses Merton. Lots of references here to series of citation and networks of relationships among Scholars the other references they make to each other's work

Remove second occurrence of name.

Dixon's (2010: 263)

Personal communication?

Include name only once. This style of formatting a citation Surname's (YEAR) isn't in the style guide, so consult with an editor.

Include name only once. This style of formatting a citation Surname's (YEAR) isn't in the style guide, so consult with an editor.

Sounds a lot like the way reference managers work. In many cases, people keep the invalid or badly-formed results.

[Lyx ver.2.1.4/Win7 Pro] To use this: go to Document > Settings > LaTeX Preamble and paste just this line into the corresponding text box. Lyx will add this to the underlying document preamble and this removes those ugly borders around clickable hyperlinks, and citation indices.

Funding policies may result in a problematic growth of cited half-life of literature

See also this population genomics study in Nature Genetics that uses this data: http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v45/n1/full/ng.2494.html See also this blog posting on data citation of this data (and related problems): http://blogs.biomedcentral.com/gigablog/2012/12/21/promoting-datacitation-in-nature/

The panda and polar bear datasets should have been included in the data section rather than hidden in the URLs section. Production removed the DOIs and used (now dead) URLs instead, but for the working links and insight see the following blog: http://blogs.biomedcentral.com/gigablog/2012/12/21/promoting-datacitation-in-nature/

More on the backstory and other papers using and citing this data before the Cell publication in ths blog posting: http://blogs.biomedcentral.com/gigablog/2014/05/14/the-latest-weapon-in-publishing-data-the-polar-bear/

Importance of "top" journals

Note the in-text citation. Why doesn't he put the source's name here?

p. 60 "Citation is perhaps the most powerful technique for building an information commons that could be created with seventeenth-century technology."

I think that this is not the legal issue that is targeted in the book on this case? I concluded that it is more about whether this pamphlet and political expression is protected under the First Amendments rights of the Constitution for the defendant. Or whether obstruction of war time ideals and peace is a crime in a state of unrest?

Weller, A.-A. 2000. Biogeography, geographic variation and habitat preference in the Amazilia Hummingbird, Amazilia amazilia Lesson (Aves: Trochilidae), with notes on the status of Amazilia alticola Gould. J. Orn. 141: 93-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01651776

Anyone know the scenario he's citing here?

I'd love to read more.

Ov. Fast. 4.836-43

dionysius-bio-29

Verg. A. 12.919

Verg. A. 7.406

Verg. A. 12.134

Liv. 1 2

Verg. A. 10.76

http://data.perseus.org/citations/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0012.tlg001.perseus-grc1:2.546-2.580

That's what I said! See earlier annotation. Citing myself here. ChaChing!

I'm sure this is just being brought in here as an example of something rather split-brained that voters do, but I believe it's not well established that higher minimum wages "destroy jobs".

I wish there was a link to this research. Does any one have additional information about this? I am writing a paper on this.

Citation signals regarding future case judgments from citators:

• Negative Treatment
• Cautionary Treatment
• Positive Treatment
• Neutral History or Treatment
• Citator Information

Citation is an incentive. An answer to the question "What's in it for me?"

Are We Puppets in a Wired World? Sue Halpern November 7, 2013

World Wide Words Newsletter 855 Michael Quinion October 26, 2013

THE EXTREME MEASURES ONE MAN TOOK TO LEARN ABOUT ONLINE TRACKING Sarah Kessler October 28, 2013

Too Big to Sail? Cruise Ships Face Scrutiny Jad Mouawad October 27, 2013

A Poet With Words Trapped Inside, John Leland, October 25 2013