I selected this because some of the questions of the text coincide with the questions asked by this class. Specifically, questions of democratic values and who the people actually mean. This book tries to further an argument that a more representative "utopian" society is actually possible.

You know, I never did actually find a bibliography or works cited. Tragic.

Incomprehensible screech.

Sigh... Citations...

'Tis a hopeless want Seeking to see reference Or one citation

-Jacob Rogers

Enjoy my pretty lacklustre haiku?

You get my point about citations at this point, right? I feel kind of bad for annoying you with it constantly, to be honest.

Aaaaaaaaah citations aaaaaaaaaaah. Okay, moving on.

So, are your citations all hiding on some page I have yet to find or something? I mean, you would still need to mark down when you were directly quoting or paraphrasing something, but still. I should probably stop going on about citations, but this is very much plagiarism without them.

You literally quoted one of our readings! Why is there no citation!?

Okay, how does this article have no citations other than the images? I find it difficult to believe nothing else was looked at.

Some of the sources say they came from the library of congress, but not all of them do. I'm not sure if that means they have possession of them?

Unlike most of the website, citations are available at the bottom of this page. Very rare on this website.

More information is readily accessible through varied institutions. This is as it should be as history is meant to be public and easily researched using other sources.

Each section is clearly separated by red headers. The website creators even tell you how/who to cite and how to properly use materials on this site.

Who contributed to this project, the editors, affiliated institutions, etc. are readily available right under the main title of the website.

Sloane's A Voyage to the Islands

translation

translation

from De Rerum Natura by Titus Lucretius Carus

This part where they help users cite things from their website is really interesting to me. I think it's nice that they acknowledge their users are going to need to cite. They make it easy to cite so that they have no excuse not to.

They have such an extensive bibliography. This is fantastic resource because people often need to find primary sources and when they do they need to cite it to demonstrate how important it is as a primary source.

To ask the author of this major sciencific paper, the OpenAccessButton enables to ask the author to upload a preprint/postprint version of his/her work in an open archive.

1%--wow!

omit.

or that the previous metric wasn't capturing that dimension of quality

I think this leads to credibility issues and possibly plagiarism

I'd like to see citations for this section. Without citations it's difficult to interpret this statement as anything more than speculation. They are referring to a retracted (and republished, however not without harsh criticism by most scientists in the field, see [https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2014/06/24/scientists-react-to-republished-seralini-maize-rat-study/] for comments by scientists) paper by Seralini et al. To me, the "few studies" that hint at those effects amount to just this single, controversial and scientifically questionable study. Then again we don't know for sure how many studies they are referring to because none were cited.

Useful reference for what parts of a citation are actually needed to generate something useful.