- Last 7 days
-
-
Peterson, David, and Aaron Panofsky. ‘Metascience as a Scientific Social Movement’. Preprint. SocArXiv, 4 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa.
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Michael Eisen on Twitter: “A core problem in science publishing today is that we have a system where the complex, multidimensional assessment of the rigor, validity, utility, audience and impact of a work that emerges from peer review gets reduced to a single overvalued ‘accept/reject’ decision.” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved August 10, 2020, from https://twitter.com/mbeisen/status/1291752487448276992
-
- Jul 2020
-
docs.google.com docs.google.com
-
COVID-19 Social Science Tracker - Google Sheets
Tags
- social media
- unofficial
- government
- spreadsheet
- conspiracy theory
- community
- isolation
- mental health
- medicine
- analysis
- publication
- infection
- behavior
- sheets
- tracker
- lang:en
- data collection
- misinformation
- COVID-19
- policy
- research
- preprint
- is:other
- social distancing
- healthcare
- social science
- social norm
- international
- uncertainty
Annotators
URL
-
-
vimeo.com vimeo.com
-
SciBeh’s Hypothes.is Tool. (n.d.). Vimeo. Retrieved July 15, 2020, from https://vimeo.com/436845680
-
-
www.pscp.tv www.pscp.tv
-
JAMA Network - Discussing preprint servers and social media.
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
COVID-19, preprints, and the information ecosystem. (n.d.). Retrieved June 17, 2020, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWi4Q5rZiO0
-
- Jun 2020
-
www.the100.ci www.the100.ci
-
Mis-allocated scrutiny. (2020, June 24). The 100% CI. http://www.the100.ci/2020/06/24/mis-allocated-scrutiny/
-
-
www.thelancet.com www.thelancet.com
-
Health, T. L. G. (2020). Publishing in the time of COVID-19. The Lancet Global Health, 8(7), e860. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30260-6
-
-
shiny.initiativesnumeriques.org shiny.initiativesnumeriques.org
-
Vincent-Lamarre, P., Sugimoto, C.R., & Larivière, V. (n.d.). Monitoring women's scholarly production during the COVID-19 pandemic. Shiny.initiativesnumeriques.org. http://shiny.initiativesnumeriques.org/monitoring-scholarly-covid/
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Mason Porter on Twitter: “I am here to help. https://t.co/JBQbTAPTQX” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from https://twitter.com/masonporter/status/1273054551583555585
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
BehSciMeta repost. (2020, May 22). "Great piece by James Heathers on how preprints have turned into publicity vehicles and researchers are being irresponsible in not responding to criticism" Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciMeta/comments/go6lik/great_piece_by_james_heathers_on_how_preprints/
-
-
featuredcontent.psychonomic.org featuredcontent.psychonomic.org
-
Lindsay, D. S. (2020, May 29). Enhancing Peer Review of Scientific Reports. Psychonomic Society Featured Content. https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/enhancing-peer-review-of-scientific-reports/
-
-
featuredcontent.psychonomic.org featuredcontent.psychonomic.org
-
Holcombe, A. (2020, May 25). As new venues for peer review flower, will journals catch up? Psychonomic Society Featured Content. https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/as-new-venues-for-peer-review-flower-will-journals-catch-up/
-
-
www.bmj.com www.bmj.com
-
Glasziou, P. P., Sanders, S., & Hoffmann, T. (2020). Waste in covid-19 research. BMJ 2020;369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1847
-
-
-
Cohen, P. N. (2020, June 8). Talk: How we know: COVID-19, preprints, and the information ecosystem. SocOpen: Home of SocArXiv. https://socopen.org/2020/06/08/talk-how-we-know-covid-19-preprints-and-the-information-ecosystem/
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
chris hartgerink on Twitter: “@PsyArXivBot just got a sibling 🎉🤖 I just created a twitter bot for @metaarxiv for all the people interested in following meta-research preprints.” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://twitter.com/chartgerink/status/1269979295591563264
-
-
-
Heathers, J. (2020, May 21). Preprints Aren’t The Problem—WE Are The Problem. Medium. https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/preprints-arent-the-problem-we-are-the-problem-75d29a317625
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Daniël Lakens on Twitter
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
r/BehSciMeta—Comment by u/nick_chater on ”Programming errors and their implications”. (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved June 1, 2020, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciMeta/comments/gsowog/programming_errors_and_their_implications/fsi76l7
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
r/BehSciMeta—No appeasement of bad faith actors. (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved June 2, 2020, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciMeta/comments/gv0y99/no_appeasement_of_bad_faith_actors/
-
- May 2020
-
docs.google.com docs.google.com
-
COVID-19 psychology preprints. (n.d.). Google Docs. Retrieved April 28, 2020, from https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18MRSOerGy6f0YuL5ftKHtA6nja1TxgU9NSwyyhfTWf4/edit?usp=embed_facebook
-
-
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
-
Bajak, A., & Howe, J. (2020, May 14). Opinion | A Study Said Covid Wasn’t That Deadly. The Right Seized It. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/14/opinion/coronavirus-research-misinformation.html
-
-
www.sciencemediacentre.org www.sciencemediacentre.org
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Lakens, D. (2020). Pandemic researchers—Recruit your own best critics. Nature, 581(7807), 121–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01392-8
-
-
Local file Local file
-
Australian Reproducibility Network materials. (2020). https://doi.org/None
Tags
Annotators
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci en Twitter: “There is now a flood of COVID-19 preprints from the behavioural sciences - these need critical evaluation and discussion! Are you a behavioural scientist? Then please join our community-based discussion platform now, see: https://t.co/zDXjvZFtkM” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved May 6, 2020, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1257923658334511104
-
-
theconversation.com theconversation.com
-
Munafo, M. (n.d.). What you need to know about how coronavirus is changing science. The Conversation. Retrieved May 6, 2020, from http://theconversation.com/what-you-need-to-know-about-how-coronavirus-is-changing-science-137641
-
- Apr 2020
-
docs.google.com docs.google.com
-
Google Doc. COVID-19 Preprint Tracker
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Alex Holcombe en Twitter: “Finally journal editors are losing their lock on scholarship- COVID19 is speeding this up. @elife will ‘make the posting of preprints to bioRxiv or medRxiv the default for all eLife submissions’ @eLife ahead of the pack; the leaders are @Meta_Psy and other small journals. @SciBeh” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved April 17, 2020, from https://twitter.com/ceptional/status/1248353897195769857
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci en Twitter: “RT @paimadhu: I suspect most folks rushing to pre-prints with correlations between #Covid_19 & a host of variables (e.g. BCG, malaria endem…” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved April 21, 2020, from https://twitter.com/scibeh/status/1252311781382541312
-
-
www.mdpi.com www.mdpi.com
-
Preprints? What? Also sometimes referred to as e-prints, they are digitally shared, non-peer-reviewed scholarly articles that typically precede publication in a peer-reviewed journal [3]. They have been a part of science since at least the 1960s [4].
Definisi preprint
Preprint adalah makalah yang belum menjalani peninjauan sejawat yang versi digitalnya dibagikan secara daring. Preprint biasanya dibagikan sebelum dikirimkan ke jurnal.
Preprint bukan barang baru
Preprint telah dikenal sejak tahun 1960an (bidang biologi/ilmu hayati). Preprint merupakan salah satu produk turunan dari
wwwyang diciptakan pada tahun 1990 oleh Tim Berners-Lee.
-
-
eartharxiv.org eartharxiv.org
-
Preprints? What?Alsosometimesreferred to ase-prints, they are digitally-shared,non-peer-reviewed scholarly articles that typically precede publication in a peer-reviewed journal [3]. They have been a part of science since at least the 1960s [4]. In 1990, Tim Berners-Lee created the World Wide Web to help researchers share knowledge easily.
Definisi preprint
Preprint adalah makalah yang belum menjalani peninjauan sejawat yang versi digitalnya dibagikan secara daring. Preprint biasanya dibagikan sebelum dikirimkan ke jurnal.
Preprint bukan barang baru
Preprint telah dikenal sejak tahun 1960an (bidang biologi/ilmu hayati). Preprint merupakan salah satu produk turunan dari
wwwyang diciptakan pada tahun 1990 oleh Tim Berners-Lee.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Mar 2020
-
www.preprints.org www.preprints.org
-
unidad_COVID2019
-
-
www.medrxiv.org www.medrxiv.org
-
unidad_COVID2019
-
-
www.researchsquare.com www.researchsquare.com
-
unidad_COVID2019
DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-19554/v1
-
- Feb 2020
-
blog.engrxiv.org blog.engrxiv.org
-
which they estimate to be $230,000 per year.
There is some good discussion on HN about the realistic nature of this estimated expense and how it is not likely out-of-line with what it should be and may actually be quite reasonable.
-
- Dec 2019
-
-
Please add some tutorial regarding how to setup a preprint server
-
- Sep 2019
-
-
Transparent Review in Preprints will allow journals and peer review services to show peer reviews next to the version of the manuscript that was submitted and reviewed.
A subtle but important point here is that when the manuscript is a preprint then there are two public-facing documents that are being tied together-- the "published" article and the preprint. The review-as-annotation becomes the cross-member in that document association.
-
- Jun 2019
-
elifesciences.org elifesciences.org
-
Data for bioRxiv preprints from start to November 2018 (covering metadata and traction on social media)
Continues to be updated, viewable from rxivist.org and associated Zenodo data records (see link from rxivist)
Preprint available at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/515643v2
-
- Mar 2019
-
academic.oup.com academic.oup.com
-
Why did some practices not implement new antibiotic prescribing guidelines on urinary tract infection? A cohort study and survey in NHS England primary care
An earlier version of this work is available as a preprint on bioRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/355289
Disclosure: I work for ASAPbio, a non-profit organisation working to improve transparency in science, including through the productive use of preprinting in the life sciences.
-
-
academic.oup.com academic.oup.com
-
Neuronal Origin of the Temporal Dynamics of Spontaneous BOLD Activity Correlation
An earlier version of this work is available as a preprint on bioRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/169698
Disclosure: I work for ASAPbio, a non-profit organisation working to improve transparency in science, including through the productive use of preprinting in the life sciences.
-
-
link.springer.com link.springer.com
-
Refresh my memory: Episodic memory reinstatements intrude on working memory maintenance
An earlier version of this work is available as a preprint on bioRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/170720
Disclosure: I work for ASAPbio, a non-profit organisation working to improve transparency in science, including through the productive use of preprinting in the life sciences.
-
-
academic.oup.com academic.oup.com
-
Working Memory Load Modulates Neuronal Coupling
An earlier version of this work is available as a preprint on bioRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/192336
Disclosure: I work for ASAPbio, a non-profit organisation working to improve transparency in science, including through the productive use of preprinting in the life sciences.
-
-
jvi.asm.org jvi.asm.org
-
A 2.8-Angstrom-Resolution Cryo-Electron Microscopy Structure of Human Parechovirus 3 in Complex with Fab from a Neutralizing Antibody
An earlier version of this work is available as a preprint on bioRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/410217
Disclosure: I work for ASAPbio, a non-profit organisation working to improve transparency in science, including through the productive use of preprinting in the life sciences.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
academic.oup.com academic.oup.com
-
A neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in the VPS51 subunit of the GARP and EARP complexes
An earlier version of this work is available as a preprint on bioRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/409441
Disclosure: I work for ASAPbio, a non-profit organisation working to improve transparency in science, including through the productive use of preprinting in the life sciences.
-
-
-
Why Are CD8 T Cell Epitopes of Human Influenza A Virus Conserved?
An earlier version of this work is available as a preprint on bioRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/408880
Disclosure: I work for ASAPbio, a non-profit organisation working to improve transparency in science, including through the productive use of preprinting in the life sciences.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
jvi.asm.org jvi.asm.org
-
Hemagglutinin Stalk-Reactive Antibodies Interfere with Influenza Virus Neuraminidase Activity by Steric Hindrance
An earlier version of this work is available as a preprint on bioRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/400036
Disclosure: I work for ASAPbio, a non-profit organisation working to improve transparency in science, including through the productive use of preprinting in the life sciences.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Jan 2019
-
theconversation.com theconversation.com
-
Para dosen kerap mengatakan bahwa terbatasnya akses terhadap publikasi yang sudah terbit merupakan salah satu faktor penyebab dari ketiadaan ide baru. Kementerian Ristekdikti telah mencoba mengatasi masalah ini sejak 2015 dengan berlangganan jurnal-jurnal ilmiah internasional.
Ini memang masalah lain. Banyak yang tidak tahu bahwa jumlah makalah akses terbuka terus meningkat setiap tahun. Bahkan untuk makalah yang berbayar, sudah ada kesadaran yang makin meningkat dari penulis untuk mengunggah pula versi pracetak (atau pra peninjauan) ke media-media repositori yang terbuka. Dari sisi penulis, saya juga menghimbau dengan sangat kesadaran mengenai hak cipta dan hak intelektual lainnya yang mereka miliki. Hak yang harus mereka manfaatkan untuk kepentingan masyarakat, bukan hanya diserahkan seluruhnya kepada penerbit, terutama penerbit komersial.
-
- Feb 2018
-
osf.io osf.io
-
Artikel ini sangat menarik karena memberikan solusi kepada masalah sehari-hari. Siapa yang tidak ingin aman saat menggunakan kompor gas. Pasti semua orang bukan.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Jan 2018
-
openscience.com openscience.com
-
a country-level preprint repository
There are many repositories built by universities across Indonesia. However, the usage is fairly minimum without a good promotion, internally to the academic community as well as externally to the stakeholders. we don't know exactly what's the problem, but strangely, when we introduced INArxiv in mid August 2017, the public responses had been so overwhelming. Had the existing repository been lacked of scholarly communication strategies, or simply less knowledge about managing a repository, but this preprinting movement finds its way inside the mind of many Indonesian scientists.
-
-
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
-
Twenty-two journals among the 23 journals participating in the survey allowed authors to cite non-English materials in their papers.
Ini bukti bahwa jurnal LN juga membolehkan penulis menyitat sumber yang tidak berbahasa Inggris. Jadi kalau Anda ingin menggunakan Bahasa Inggris dan sedang menulis makalah untuk dikirim ke jurnal LN, maka tidak ada halangan bagi anda untuk menyitat dokumen yang ditulis oleh rekan-rekan penulis dari DN. INArxiv bisa jadi salah satu media yang tepat untuk kebutuhan itu.
-
- Sep 2017
-
Local file Local file
-
TheScholarlyCommons
You can annotate the pdf in Chrome with Hypothes.is (see https://web.hypothes.is/blog/annotating-pdfs-without-urls/)
-
- Jun 2017
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
protected platform whereby many expert reviewers could read and comment on submissions, as well as on fellow reviewers’ comments
Conduct prepeer review during the manuscript development on a web platform. That is what is happening in Therapoid.net.
-
intelligent crowd reviewing
Crowdsourcing review? Prepeer review as precursor to preprint server.
-
- Aug 2016
-
-
Clarity on what qualifies as a respected preprint
Why should we respect a preprint? I'm not sure that we should respect anonymously peer reviewed journal articles as much as we do. It's important to remain critical, and I worry that trying to put a veneer of 'respectability' over preprints is not as helpful as expecting people to read them to judge content.
-
- Jun 2016
-
Local file Local file
-
I have chosen not to hide behind the cloak of anonymity, orbypass the rigors of peer review by posting a version of thispaper on my Web site;
"chosen not to hide behind the cloak of anonymity, or bypass the rigors of peer review by posting a version of this paper to my Web site.
-
- May 2016
-
science.sciencemag.org science.sciencemag.org
-
the median review time at journals has grown from 85 days to >150 days during the past decade (5)
This statement is a misunderstanding of Powell 2016, which states:
At Nature, the median review time has grown from 85 days to just above 150 days over the past decade, according to Himmelstein's analysis.
However,
the median review time — the time between submission and acceptance of a paper — has hovered at around 100 days for more than 30 years.
So while the median review time at Nature has gone from 85 to 150 days, this is not the case for all journals. See also the related Tweet.
-