- Jan 2022
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
- Dec 2021
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Replicating scientific results is tough—But essential. (2021). Nature, 600(7889), 359–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-03736-4
-
- Nov 2021
-
link.springer.com link.springer.com
-
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
-
I have no problem with publishers making a profit, or with peer reviewers doing their work for free. The problem I have is when there is such an enormous gap between those two positions.
If publishers make billions in profit (and they do), while at the same time reviewers are doing a billion dollars worth of work for free, that seems like a broken system.
I think there are parallels with how users contribute value to social media companies. In both cases, users/reviewers are getting some value in return, but most of the value that's captured goes to the publisher/tech company.
I'd like to see a system where more of the value accrues to the reviewers. This could be in the form of direct payment, although this is probably less preferable because of the challenges of trying to convert the value of different kinds of peer review into a dollar amount.
Another problem with simply paying reviewers is that it retains the status quo; we keep the same system with all of it's faults and redistribute profits. This is an OK option as it at least sees some of the value that normally accrues to publishers moving to reviewers.
I also don’t believe that open access - in it’s current form - is a good option either. There are still enormous costs associated with publishing; the only difference is that those costs are now covered by institutions instead of the reader. The publisher still makes a heart-stopping profit.
A more elegant solution, although more challenging, would be for academics to step away from publishers altogether and start their own journals, on their own terms.
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
The Lancet Infectious Diseases on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved 5 November 2021, from https://twitter.com/TheLancetInfDis/status/1456218131572068367
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
- Oct 2021
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
infinitysquares.carrd.co infinitysquares.carrd.co
-
“Bring your attention back to the present moment, and make a deliberate choice to engage in the action that would reduce the gap separating your current life from your ideal life.”
“You have set the intention. Now it's time to act.”
-
-
medium.com medium.com
-
Today, I noticed that Michal Korzonek has expanded on his concept of minimalist journaling.
Michal’s Medium page has this in the masthead: One square = one day of your life. What will you draw in yours? ✨ https://infinitysquares.carrd.co/
-
-
miro.com miro.com
-
Integrating the minimalist journal in an interface for system thinking of the personal, social, economic, political, and ecological as nested holobionts.
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
betterhumans.pub betterhumans.pub
-
How to create your own habit dashboard that motivates you to stick to any habit
-
-
advances.sciencemag.org advances.sciencemag.org
-
Serra-Garcia, M., & Gneezy, U. (2021). Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones. Science Advances, 7(21), eabd1705. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd1705
-
-
uk.sagepub.com uk.sagepub.com
-
Collective Intelligence. (2020, July 18). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/collective-intelligence/journal203713
-
- Sep 2021
-
bauhouse.ca bauhouse.ca
-
This project is an initial prototype of an application for a minimalist journaling system as conceived by Michal Korzonek.
-
-
-
Mark Wagnon shared this site for personal growth, community development, and global connection when I was talking about an idea to build an app for a Minimalist Journal.
-
-
Local file Local file
-
R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
Found on Wiley Journals Audience: Wiley Open Access journals are supported by a network of authoritative journals and societies as well as internationally renowned editorial board members. All research articles published in Wiley Open Access journals are immediately freely available to read, download and share. Wiley Open Access publishes a number of online journals across biological, chemical and health sciences.
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
- Aug 2021
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
brill.com brill.com
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
gizmodo.com gizmodo.com
-
Gizmodo. “Journal Retracts Terrible Study That Claimed Widespread Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths.” Accessed August 16, 2021. https://gizmodo.com/journal-retracts-terrible-study-that-claimed-widespread-1847219596.
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
- Jul 2021
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Yesilada, M., Holford, D. L., Wulf, M., Hahn, U., Lewandowsky, S., Herzog, S., Radosevic, M., Stuchlý, E., Taylor, K., Ye, S., Saxena, G., & El-Halaby, G. (2021). Who, What, Where: Tracking the development of COVID-19 related PsyArXiv preprints. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/evmgs
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Prof Nichola Raihani on Twitter: “Submitted a paper reporting null results to a mid tier journal. Guess how it went. I literally don’t care at this point but I do feel bad for the first author (who I won’t name here). Https://t.co/sX5lTcEl29” / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved July 16, 2021, from https://twitter.com/nicholaraihani/status/1415308025179656194
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
- Jun 2021
-
www.excellentwebworld.com www.excellentwebworld.com
-
the Wall Street Journal is over a century old newspaper daily (established on July 8, 1889) in the USA, its app version was launched in 2004 to allow smartphone users access information on the go.
-
-
blog.scholasticahq.com blog.scholasticahq.com
-
Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) beyond the DOI
Research other persistent identifiers besides DOI.
-
To get closer to attaining coveted “rich” metadata and ultimately contribute to a “richer” scholarly communication ecosystem, journals first need to have machine-readable metadata that is clean, consistent, and as interoperable as possible.
What WordPress plugins provide structured metadata functionality for OpenPhysio.
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
-
Publisher costs usually include copyediting/formatting and organizing peer review. While these content transformations are fundamental and beneficial, they alone cannot justify the typical APC (Article Publication Charge), especially since peer reviewers are not paid.
But peer reviewers are largely responsible for generating the assertions you talk about in the next paragraph, and which apparently, justify the cost of publishing.
-
- May 2021
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
-
There was no public forum for incremental advances.
I've never thought of the academic paper as a format that enabled the documentation of incremental progress.
-
-
www.nature.com www.nature.comNetworks1
-
Network science is now a mature research field, whose growth was catalysed by the introduction of the ‘small world’ network model in 1998. Networks give mathematical descriptions of systems containing containing many interacting components, including power grids, neuronal networks and ecosystems. This collection brings together selected research, comments and review articles on how networks are structured (Layers & structure); how networks can describe healthy and disordered systems (Brain & disorders); how dynamics unfold on networks (Dynamics & spread); and community structures and resilience in networks (Community & resilience).
This is a great looking collection of articles on network science.
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Chawla, D. S. (2021). Hundreds of ‘predatory’ journals indexed on leading scholarly database. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00239-0
-
- Apr 2021
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
leonidtiokhin.medium.com leonidtiokhin.medium.com
-
Tiokhin, L. (2021, April 21). Why indirect contributions matter for science and scientists. Medium. https://leonidtiokhin.medium.com/why-indirect-contributions-matter-for-science-and-scientists-6c9bf827bc7d
-
-
link.springer.com link.springer.com
-
Volume 52, issue 1, February 2021
French version of the ToC available https://doi.org/10.15454/LYQOEP
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Apidologie
Translations :
- French translation (title and keywords): <br/> La taille du corps mais non l’âge influence la phototaxis chez les bourdons (Bombus terrestris L.).
activité locomotrice / division du travail / taille du corps / phototaxie / âge / Bombus
- German translation (title and keywords): <br/> Die Körpergrösse und nicht das Alter beeinflusst das Phototaxisverhalten bei Arbeiterinnen der Hummel Bombus terrestris L.
Bewegungsaktivität / Arbeitsteilung / Körpergrösse / Phototaxis / Alter / Bombus
-
-
link.springer.com link.springer.com
-
Species turnover and low stability in a community of euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) sampled within 28 years in an urban forest fragment
French translation (title and keywords):
Turnover d’espèces et faible stabilité dans une communauté d’abeilles euglossine (Hymenoptera : Apidae) échantillonnée dans un fragment de forêt urbaine, pendant 28 ans.
Euglossa cordata / Eulaema nigrita / abeille à orchidées / espèce résiliente.
German translation (title and keywords):
Artenwechsel und geringe Stabilität in einer Gemeinschaft von Euglossinen (Hymenoptera: Apidae), die über einen Zeitraum von 28 Jahren in einem urbanen Waldfragment gesammelt wurden.
Euglossa cordata / Eulaema nigrita / Prachtbienen/ resiliente Arten.
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
- Mar 2021
-
-
Schiavone, S. R., Bottesini, J. G., & Vazire, S. (2021). The Crisis from Above: Gatekeepers Need Better Standards. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mby5u
-
-
www.principia.network www.principia.network
-
PRINCIPIA - Decentralized peer review. (n.d.). Retrieved 5 March 2021, from http://www.principia.network/
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Anne Urai. (2020, November 15). All-inclusive authorship on large scientific papers can a be dangerous practice Alert: Potential unpopular opinion Thread 👇1/n [Tweet]. @AnneEUrai. https://twitter.com/AnneEUrai/status/1327934091929464832
-
-
Local file Local file
-
CHILD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES
The article is found in this scholarly journal.
-
- Feb 2021
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
biorxiv.org biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
- Jan 2021
-
-
The submitted manuscript is a privileged communication; reviewers must treat it as confidential. It should not be retained or copied. Also, reviewers must not share the manuscript with any colleagues without the explicit permission of the editor. Reviewers and editors must not make any personal or professional use of the data, arguments, or interpretations (other than those directly involved in its peer review) prior to publication unless they have the authors' specific permission or are writing an editorial or commentary to accompany the article.
Etika untuk Mitra Bestari
-
The reviewer should have identified and commented on major strengths and weaknesses of study design and methodology The reviewer should comment accurately and constructively upon the quality of the author's interpretation of the data, including acknowledgment of its limitations. The reviewer should comment on major strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript as a written communication, independent of the design, methodology, results, and interpretation of the study. The reviewer should comment on any ethical concerns raised by the study, or any possible evidence of low standards of scientific conduct. The reviewer should provide the author with useful suggestions for improvement of the manuscript. The reviewer's comments to the author should be constructive and professional The review should provide the editor the proper context and perspective to make a decision on acceptance (and/or revision) of the manuscript.
Poin-poin yang mejadi tolok ukur mitra bestari dalam melakukan review
-
to provide written assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of written research, with the aim of improving the reporting of research and identifying the most appropriate and highest quality material for the journal
Tujuan dari peninjauan sejawat (peer-review) adalah mengetahui kekuatan dan kelemahan naskah sehingga dapat dilakukan peningkatan mutu.
-
Authorship
semua orang yang berkontribusi secara substansial terhadap proses perencanaan, pengumpulan data, interpretasi hasil maupun penulisan dan merevisi naskah secara kritis dan menyetujui manuskrip versi akhir dan setuju untuk bertanggung jawab atas semua aspek pekerjaan. Setiap orang yang memenuhi kriteria pertama harus diizinkan berpartisipasi dalam penyusunan dan persetujuan manuskrip versi final (ICMJE 2017). Penulis pertama haruslah seseorang yang berkontribusi paling banyak.
https://www.ease.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/doi.10.20316.ESE_.2018.44.e1.in_.pdf
-
Animal experiments should require full compliance with local, national, ethical, and regulatory principles, and local licensing arrangements
Demikian juga dengan penggunaan hewan sebayak objek kajian, harus mengikuti standar etika yang berlaku (Helsinki).
-
Journals should have explicit policies as to whether these review board approvals must be documented by the authors, or simply attested to in their cover letter, and how they should be described in the manuscript itself
Seminimal mungkin, penulis harus menyampaikan keputusan etik dari komisi etik dan lebih ideal lagi jika menyertakan surat keputusan bebas etiknya.
-
For those investigators who do not have access to formal ethics review committees, the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki should be followed
Jika tidak memungkinkan untuk diperoleh hasil review etik, penulis seharusnya secara explisit menjelaskan apakah pelaksanaan kajian sesuai dengan Deklarasi Helsinki atau mereka memiliki pandangan lain.
-
Documented review and approval from a formally constituted review board (Institutional Review Board or Ethics committee) should be required for all studies involving people, medical records, and human tissues
Penulis harus menyertakan keterangan bebas review yang diterbitkan oleh komisi etik penelitian kesehatan.
-
Fabrication, falsification, concealment, deceptive reporting, or misrepresentation of data constitute scientific misconduct
Untuk mencapai kualitas terbaik pada ilmu pengetahuan yang diterbitkan, kajian harus terbebas dari permasalahan etika tersebut
-
- Dec 2020
-
hybridpedagogy.org hybridpedagogy.org
-
Following the model of open-source software, we can enter our ideas and expressions into public discourse
This also isn't a well-aligned argument. Articles published in a for-profit journal are entered into the public discourse (although obviously not into the public domain). Unless public means "without cost", which I don't think it does.
We might want to broaden this to include open-access, which is specific to publication models.
-
- Nov 2020
-
medium.com medium.com
-
-
www.jacc.org www.jacc.org
-
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
-
-
esc365.escardio.org esc365.escardio.org
-
European Society of Cardiology
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Oct 2020
-
www.nejm.org www.nejm.org
-
micrositio
-