- Jan 2021
-
-
The submitted manuscript is a privileged communication; reviewers must treat it as confidential. It should not be retained or copied. Also, reviewers must not share the manuscript with any colleagues without the explicit permission of the editor. Reviewers and editors must not make any personal or professional use of the data, arguments, or interpretations (other than those directly involved in its peer review) prior to publication unless they have the authors' specific permission or are writing an editorial or commentary to accompany the article.
Etika untuk Mitra Bestari
-
The reviewer should have identified and commented on major strengths and weaknesses of study design and methodology The reviewer should comment accurately and constructively upon the quality of the author's interpretation of the data, including acknowledgment of its limitations. The reviewer should comment on major strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript as a written communication, independent of the design, methodology, results, and interpretation of the study. The reviewer should comment on any ethical concerns raised by the study, or any possible evidence of low standards of scientific conduct. The reviewer should provide the author with useful suggestions for improvement of the manuscript. The reviewer's comments to the author should be constructive and professional The review should provide the editor the proper context and perspective to make a decision on acceptance (and/or revision) of the manuscript.
Poin-poin yang mejadi tolok ukur mitra bestari dalam melakukan review
-
to provide written assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of written research, with the aim of improving the reporting of research and identifying the most appropriate and highest quality material for the journal
Tujuan dari peninjauan sejawat (peer-review) adalah mengetahui kekuatan dan kelemahan naskah sehingga dapat dilakukan peningkatan mutu.
-
Authorship
semua orang yang berkontribusi secara substansial terhadap proses perencanaan, pengumpulan data, interpretasi hasil maupun penulisan dan merevisi naskah secara kritis dan menyetujui manuskrip versi akhir dan setuju untuk bertanggung jawab atas semua aspek pekerjaan. Setiap orang yang memenuhi kriteria pertama harus diizinkan berpartisipasi dalam penyusunan dan persetujuan manuskrip versi final (ICMJE 2017). Penulis pertama haruslah seseorang yang berkontribusi paling banyak.
https://www.ease.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/doi.10.20316.ESE_.2018.44.e1.in_.pdf
-
Animal experiments should require full compliance with local, national, ethical, and regulatory principles, and local licensing arrangements
Demikian juga dengan penggunaan hewan sebayak objek kajian, harus mengikuti standar etika yang berlaku (Helsinki).
-
Journals should have explicit policies as to whether these review board approvals must be documented by the authors, or simply attested to in their cover letter, and how they should be described in the manuscript itself
Seminimal mungkin, penulis harus menyampaikan keputusan etik dari komisi etik dan lebih ideal lagi jika menyertakan surat keputusan bebas etiknya.
-
For those investigators who do not have access to formal ethics review committees, the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki should be followed
Jika tidak memungkinkan untuk diperoleh hasil review etik, penulis seharusnya secara explisit menjelaskan apakah pelaksanaan kajian sesuai dengan Deklarasi Helsinki atau mereka memiliki pandangan lain.
-
Documented review and approval from a formally constituted review board (Institutional Review Board or Ethics committee) should be required for all studies involving people, medical records, and human tissues
Penulis harus menyertakan keterangan bebas review yang diterbitkan oleh komisi etik penelitian kesehatan.
-
Fabrication, falsification, concealment, deceptive reporting, or misrepresentation of data constitute scientific misconduct
Untuk mencapai kualitas terbaik pada ilmu pengetahuan yang diterbitkan, kajian harus terbebas dari permasalahan etika tersebut
-
- Dec 2020
-
hybridpedagogy.org hybridpedagogy.org
-
Following the model of open-source software, we can enter our ideas and expressions into public discourse
This also isn't a well-aligned argument. Articles published in a for-profit journal are entered into the public discourse (although obviously not into the public domain). Unless public means "without cost", which I don't think it does.
We might want to broaden this to include open-access, which is specific to publication models.
-
- Nov 2020
-
medium.com medium.com
-
-
www.jacc.org www.jacc.org
-
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
-
-
esc365.escardio.org esc365.escardio.org
-
European Society of Cardiology
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Oct 2020
-
www.nejm.org www.nejm.org
-
micrositio
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
medium.com medium.com
-
Holcombe, A. (2020, September 30). Conventional journal rankings—Fight them! Medium. https://medium.com/@ceptional/conventional-journal-rankings-fight-them-9c6db600b0dd
-
-
www.springer.com www.springer.com
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.thelancet.com www.thelancet.com
-
unidad_COVID2019
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
- Sep 2020
-
www.int-res.com www.int-res.com
-
www.journals.elsevier.com www.journals.elsevier.com
-
www.redalyc.org www.redalyc.org
-
-
-
Kojaku, S., Livan, G., & Masuda, N. (2020). Detecting citation cartels in journal networks. ArXiv:2009.09097 [Physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.09097
-
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Kwon, D. (2020). More than 100 scientific journals have disappeared from the Internet. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02610-z
-
-
rapidreviewscovid19.mitpress.mit.edu rapidreviewscovid19.mitpress.mit.edu
-
Rapid Reviews COVID-19. (n.d.). Rapid Reviews COVID-19. Retrieved September 11, 2020, from https://rapidreviewscovid19.mitpress.mit.edu/
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
r/BehSciMeta - Comment by u/dawnlxh on ”A completely re-imagined approach to peer review and publishing: PRINCIPIA”. (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved September 10, 2020, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciMeta/comments/if03sk/a_completely_reimagined_approach_to_peer_review/g4nnuc5
-
-
www.cos.io www.cos.io
-
Science, C. for O. (n.d.). TOP Guidelines. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://www.cos.io/our-services/top-guidelines
-
-
www.biorgpartnership.com www.biorgpartnership.com
-
Lab to field. (n.d.). Behaviourally Informed Organizations. Retrieved June 21, 2020, from https://www.biorgpartnership.com/lab-to-field
-
-
www.grammarly.com www.grammarly.com
-
On Sentence Fragments
-
-
writingcenter.ashford.edu writingcenter.ashford.edu
-
Sentence Fragments
-
-
www.grammarly.com www.grammarly.com
-
Passive Voice Article
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.grammarly.com www.grammarly.comEm Dash1
-
Em Dash
Good examples of Em Dash use
-
-
getitwriteonline.com getitwriteonline.com
-
We use the em dash to create a strong break in the structure of a sentence. We can use these dashes in pairs, as we would use parentheses—that is, to enclose a word, or a phrase, or a clause (as we’ve done here)—or they can be used alone to detach one end of a sentence from its main body.
-
on Hyphen, em dashes and en dashes.
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
hyphen, em dash, en dash
Hyphen
- combine words making compounds.
e.g., well-being advanced-level school-aged 16-year-old
Em Dash
Em is a typographical unit of measure.
- Use the em dash to create a strong break in the meaning and structure of a sentence. They can be used in pairs like parentheses, or alone as a way to detach the end or beginning of a sentence from the main body.
En Dash means as "through", often used to describe a range of numbers 2–27, 30–35 years old.
In the associated press style there is advice to use a space in between the dashes.
When to use em dashes versus comma vs. em dashes.
Parentheses, can sometimes be interpreted to downplay importance of information.
Commas, okay to use unless you have more commas in the sentence, and doesn't draw particular attention to info — doesn't emphasize it enough.
Em Dashes, indicate that information is important or are useful when commas don't work.
-
- Aug 2020
-
openscience.bmj.com openscience.bmj.com
-
BMJ Open Science
lavaylanda
bioinformacion
infovestigacion
curso
ciencia abierta
-
-
retractionwatch.com retractionwatch.com
-
Marcus, A. A. (2020, August 16). Hydroxychloroquine, push-scooters, and COVID-19: A journal gets stung, and swiftly retracts. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/2020/08/16/hydroxychloroquine-push-scooters-and-covid-19-a-journal-gets-stung-and-swiftly-retracts/
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Paris, Marseille named as high-risk COVID zones, making curbs likelier. (2020, August 14). Reuters. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-france-idUKKCN25A0LC
-
-
-
It will find there is "very little evidence that the virus is transmitted in schools",
The reporter interviewed Professor Russel Viner, president of Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health. Apparently, a study was conducted through April to June which collected information of 20,000 students and 100 teachers yet there is no link to this study, did not get peer reviewed or published. It is all just claims at this point. We have no knowledge if these are private schools or public, if there were any safety measures in place, if this included online classes vs in class.
However, according to CDC and the respected studies it cited, there seems to be lower transmission rates among children and transmission from child to family, but this remains inconclusive. There still needs to be more evidence to be gathered.
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Michael Eisen on Twitter: “A core problem in science publishing today is that we have a system where the complex, multidimensional assessment of the rigor, validity, utility, audience and impact of a work that emerges from peer review gets reduced to a single overvalued ‘accept/reject’ decision.” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved August 10, 2020, from https://twitter.com/mbeisen/status/1291752487448276992
-
- Jul 2020
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
-
COVID-19: Relevant Calls for Papers from APA Journals. (n.d.). Https://Www.Apa.Org. Retrieved July 1, 2020, from https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/covid-19-calls-for-papers
-
- Jun 2020
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Yamada, Y. (2020). Micropublishing during and after the COVID-19 era [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8fum4
-
-
zoom.us zoom.us
-
Welcome! You are invited to join a webinar: COVID-19 Series: Medical journals - Episode 24. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email about joining the webinar. (n.d.). Zoom Video. Retrieved June 20, 2020, from https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_4_dGVRvDQEWi_d7ll7kMtQ
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
RSM COVID-19 Series | Episode 24: Medical Journals. (2020, June 24). YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=et-kl5ypx8Q
-
-
doi.org doi.org
-
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2020). Pandemic Publishing: Medical journals drastically speed up their publication process for Covid-19. BioRxiv, 2020.04.18.045963. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.18.045963
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., & Jacquart, P. (2020). In praise of the impact factor [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h4p9e
-
-
featuredcontent.psychonomic.org featuredcontent.psychonomic.org
-
Holcombe, A. (2020, May 25). As new venues for peer review flower, will journals catch up? Psychonomic Society Featured Content. https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/as-new-venues-for-peer-review-flower-will-journals-catch-up/
-
-
www.aeaweb.org www.aeaweb.org
-
Ofosu, G. K., & Posner, D. N. (2020). Do Pre-analysis Plans Hamper Publication? AEA Papers and Proceedings, 110, 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201079
-
-
www.cos.io www.cos.io
-
Science, C. for O. (2020 May 5). TOP Factor to appear in Master Journal List. https://www.cos.io/about/news/cos-and-the-web-of-science-collaborate-to-bring-top-factor-to-master-journal-list
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
</br>
-
-
blog.gopheracademy.com blog.gopheracademy.com
- May 2020
-
science.sciencemag.org science.sciencemag.org
-
Aspesi, C., & Brand, A. (2020). In pursuit of open science, open access is not enough. Science, 368(6491), 574–577. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3763
-
-
phylogenomics.blogspot.com phylogenomics.blogspot.com
-
The Tree of Life: Stop deifying “peer review” of journal publications: (2012, February 4). The Tree of Life. https://phylogenomics.blogspot.com/2012/02/stop-deifying-peer-review-of-journal.html
-
-
www.apa.org www.apa.org
-
American Psychological Association. *COVID-19: Free articles from APA journals. Apa.org. https://www.apa.org/pubs/highlights/covid-19-articles
-
-
www.nber.org www.nber.org
-
Hadavand, A., Hamermesh, D.S., & Wilson, W.W. (2020). Is scholarly refereeing productive (at the margin)? The National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26614
-
-
theconversation.com theconversation.com
-
Munafo, M. (n.d.). What you need to know about how coronavirus is changing science. The Conversation. Retrieved May 6, 2020, from http://theconversation.com/what-you-need-to-know-about-how-coronavirus-is-changing-science-137641
-
-
neurochambers.blogspot.com neurochambers.blogspot.com
-
Chambers, C. (2020 March 16). CALLING ALL SCIENTISTS: Rapid evaluation of COVID19-related Registered Reports at Royal Society Open Science
10 Updates*
-
- Apr 2020
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Ennis, E. G. (2020, April 16). A Novel Solution to Academic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gqxmu
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Alex Holcombe en Twitter: “Finally journal editors are losing their lock on scholarship- COVID19 is speeding this up. @elife will ‘make the posting of preprints to bioRxiv or medRxiv the default for all eLife submissions’ @eLife ahead of the pack; the leaders are @Meta_Psy and other small journals. @SciBeh” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved April 17, 2020, from https://twitter.com/ceptional/status/1248353897195769857
-
-
lists.ufl.edu lists.ufl.edu
-
LISTSERV 16.0—SOCNET Archives. (n.d.). Retrieved April 20, 2020, from https://lists.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2004&L=SOCNET&P=9667
-
-
socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk
-
www.mja.com.au www.mja.com.au
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com
- Mar 2020
-
www.clinicalradiologyonline.net